Abstract
Cytosine methylation as a reversible chromatin mark has been investigated extensively for its influence on gene silencing and the regulation of its dynamic association–disassociation at specific sites within a eukaryotic genome. With the remarkable reductions in cost and time associated with whole-genome DNA sequence analysis, coupled with the high fidelity of bisulfite-treated DNA sequencing, single nucleotide resolution of cytosine methylation repatterning within even very large genomes is increasingly achievable. What remains a challenge is the analysis of genome-wide methylome datasets and, consequently, a clear understanding of the overall influence of methylation repatterning on gene expression or vice versa. Reported data have sometimes been subject to stringent data filtering methods that can serve to skew downstream biological interpretation. These complications derive from methylome analysis procedures that vary widely in method and parameter setting. DNA methylation as a chromatin feature that influences DNA stability can be dynamic and rapidly responsive to environmental change. Consequently, methods to discriminate background “noise” of the system from biological signal in response to specific perturbation is essential in some types of experiments. We describe numerous aspects of whole-genome bisulfite sequence data that must be contemplated as well as the various steps of methylome data analysis which impact the biological interpretation of the final output.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Holliday R, Pugh J (1975) DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 187(4173):226–232. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111098
Riggs AD (1975) X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet Genome Res 14:9–25. https://doi.org/10.1159/000130315
Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A et al (2006) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 126:1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003
Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X et al (2008) Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06745
Lister R, O’Malley RC, Tonti-Filippini J et al (2008) Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133:523–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.029
Jones PA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13:484–492
Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11:204–220
Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK (2018) Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:489–506
Dowen RH, Pelizzola M, Schmitz RJ et al (2012) Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2183–E2191. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209329109
Crisp PA, Ganguly D, Eichten SR et al (2016) Reconsidering plant memory: intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci Adv 2:e1501340. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501340
Bej S, Basak J (2017) Abiotic stress induced epigenetic modifications in plants: how much do we know? In: Plant epigenetics, pp 493–512
He XJ, Chen T, Zhu JK (2011) Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals. Cell Res 21:442–465. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.23
Du J, Johnson LM, Jacobsen SE, Patel DJ (2015) DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:519–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4043
Chatterjee A, Rodger EJ, Morison IM, et al (2017) Tools and strategies for analysis of genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation patterns. In: Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York, pp 249–277
Laird PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11:191–203
Jacinto FV, Ballestar E, Esteller M (2008) Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP): hunting down the DNA methylome. BioTechniques 44:35–43. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112708
Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Krueger F (2016) Trim Galore. In: Babraham Bioinforma. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/
Langmead B (2010) Aligning short sequencing reads with bowtie. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi1107s32
Krueger F, Andrews SR (2011) Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27:1571–1572. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167
Huang KYY, Huang YJ, Chen PY (2018) BS-Seeker3: ultrafast pipeline for bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 19:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2120-7
Pedersen B, Hsieh TF, Ibarra C, Fischer RL (2011) MethylCoder: software pipeline for bisulte-treated sequences. Bioinformatics 27:2435–2436. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr394
Feng H, Conneely KN, Wu H (2014) A Bayesian hierarchical model to detect differentially methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 42(8):e69. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku154
Schultz MD, He Y, Whitaker JW et al (2015) Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature 523:212–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14465
Hansen KD, Langmead B, Irizarry RA (2012) BSmooth: from whole genome bisulfite sequencing reads to differentially methylated regions. Genome Biol 13:R83. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-R83
Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S et al (2012) MethylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol 13:R87. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-R87
Dolzhenko E, Smith AD (2014) Using beta-binomial regression for high-precision differential methylation analysis in multifactor whole-genome bisulfite sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 15:215. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-215
Lea AJ, Tung J, Zhou X (2015) A flexible, efficient binomial mixed model for identifying differential DNA methylation in bisulfite sequencing data. PLoS Genet 11:e1005650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005650
Yelagandula R, Stroud H, Holec S et al (2014) The histone variant H2A.W defines heterochromatin and promotes chromatin condensation in Arabidopsis. Cell 158:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.006
Gouil Q, Baulcombe DC (2016) DNA methylation signatures of the plant chromomethyltransferases. PLoS Genet 12:e1006526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006526
Stroud H, Greenberg MVC, Feng S et al (2013) Comprehensive analysis of silencing mutants reveals complex regulation of the Arabidopsis methylome. Cell 152:352–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.054
Mlura A, Yonebayashi S, Watanabe K et al (2001) Mobilization of transposons by a mutation abolishing full DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Nature 411:212–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/35075612
Stuart T, Eichten SR, Cahn J et al (2016) Population scale mapping of transposable element diversity reveals links to gene regulation and epigenomic variation. elife 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20777
Fultz D, Slotkin RK (2017) Exogenous transposable elements circumvent identity-based silencing, permitting the dissection of expression-dependent silencing. Plant Cell 29:360–376. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00718
Yu A, Lepere G, Jay F et al (2013) Dynamics and biological relevance of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis antibacterial defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211757110
Schmitz RJ, Schultz MD, Urich MA et al (2013) Patterns of population epigenomic diversity. Nature 495:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11968
Dubin MJ, Zhang P, Meng D et al (2015) DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. elife 4:e05255. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05255
Kawakatsu T, Huang S shan C, Jupe F et al (2016) Epigenomic diversity in a global collection of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Cell 166:492–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.044
Ganguly DR, Crisp PA, Eichten SR, Pogson BJ (2017) The Arabidopsis DNA methylome is stable under transgenerational drought stress. Plant Physiol 175:1893–1912. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00744
Kawakatsu T, Nery JR, Castanon R, Ecker JR (2017) Dynamic DNA methylation reconfiguration during seed development and germination. Genome Biol 18:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1251-x
Kaplowitz PB, Jennings SS (1987) Effect of growth hormone therapy on caloric intake in children with growth hormone deficiency. Nutr Res 7:901–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(87)80158-6
Mirouze M, Vitte C (2014) Transposable elements, a treasure trove to decipher epigenetic variation: insights from Arabidopsis and crop epigenomes. J Exp Bot 65:2801–2812
Moarefi AH, Chédin F (2011) ICF syndrome mutations cause a broad spectrum of biochemical defects in DNMT3B-mediated de novo DNA methylation. J Mol Biol 409:758–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.050
Bewick AJ, Schmitz RJ (2017) Gene body DNA methylation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 36:103–110
Yang H, Chang F, You C et al (2015) Whole-genome DNA methylation patterns and complex associations with gene structure and expression during flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 81:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12726
Schmid MW, Heichinger C, Coman Schmid D et al (2018) Contribution of epigenetic variation to adaptation in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 9:4446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06932-5
Walker J, Gao H, Zhang J et al (2018) Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 50:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-017-0008-5
Derreumaux S, Chaoui M, Tevanian G, Fermandjian S (2001) Impact of CpG methylation on structure, dynamics and solvation of cAMP DNA responsive element. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2314–2326. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.11.2314
Severin PMD, Zou X, Gaub HE, Schulten K (2011) Cytosine methylation alters DNA mechanical properties. Nucleic Acids Res 39:8740–8751. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr578
Pérez A, Castellazzi CL, Battistini F et al (2012) Impact of methylation on the physical properties of DNA. Biophys J 102:2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.056
Ngo TTM, Yoo J, Dai Q et al (2016) Effects of cytosine modifications on DNA flexibility and nucleosome mechanical stability. Nat Commun 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10813
Roeler K, Takuno S, Gaut BS (2016) CG methylation covaries with differential gene expression between leaf and floral bud tissues of Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS One 11:e0150002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150002
Takuno S, Gaut BS (2012) Body-methylated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are functionally important and evolve slowly. Mol Biol Evol 29:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr188
Bewick AJ, Ji L, Niederhuth CE et al (2016) On the origin and evolutionary consequences of gene body DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:9111–9116. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604666113
Wang X, Zhang Z, Fu T et al (2017) Gene-body CG methylation and divergent expression of duplicate genes in rice. Sci Rep 7:2675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02860-4
Zilberman D (2017) An evolutionary case for functional gene body methylation in plants and animals. Genome Biol 18:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1230-2
Xing M-Q, Zhang Y-J, Zhou S-R et al (2015) Global analysis reveals the crucial roles of DNA methylation during Rice seed development. Plant Physiol 168:1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00414
Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen YR et al (2013) Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol 31:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2462
Lang Z, Wang Y, Tang K et al (2017) Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E4511–E4519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705233114
Candaele J, Demuynck K, Mosoti D et al (2014) Differential methylation during maize leaf growth targets developmentally regulated genes. Plant Physiol 164:1350–1364. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233312
Song Q, Zhang T, Stelly DM, Chen ZJ (2017) Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genome Biol 18:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1229-8
Holoch D, Moazed D (2015) RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 16:71–84
Matzke MA, Kanno T, Matzke AJM (2015) RNA-directed DNA methylation: the evolution of a complex epigenetic pathway in flowering plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:243–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114633
Hossain MS, Kawakatsu T, Do KK et al (2017) Divergent cytosine DNA methylation patterns in single-cell, soybean root hairs. New Phytol 214:808–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14421
Lauria M, Echegoyen-Nava RA, Rodríguez-Ríos D et al (2017) Inter-individual variation in DNA methylation is largely restricted to tissue-specific differentially methylated regions in maize. BMC Plant Biol 17:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0997-3
Turco GM, Kajala K, Kunde-Ramamoorthy G et al (2017) DNA methylation and gene expression regulation associated with vascularization in Sorghum bicolor. New Phytol 214:1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14448
Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK et al (2009) Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet 5(6):e1000530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000530
Yang DL, Zhang G, Tang K et al (2016) Dicer-independent RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell Res 26:66–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.145
Scheid OM, Probst AV, Afsar K, Paszkowski J (2002) Two regulatory levels of transcriptional gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:13659–13662. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202380499
Li D, Palanca AMS, Won SY et al (2017) The MBD7 complex promotes expression of methylated transgenes without significantly altering their methylation status. elife 6:e19893. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19893
Williams BP, Pignatta D, Henikoff S, Gehring M (2015) Methylation-sensitive expression of a DNA demethylase gene serves as an epigenetic rheostat. PLoS Genet 11:e1005142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005142
Wibowo A, Becker C, Marconi G et al (2016) Hyperosmotic stress memory in Arabidopsis is mediated by distinct epigenetically labile sites in the genome and is restricted in the male germline by DNA glycosylase activity. elife 5:e13546. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13546
Zhu H, Wang G, Qian J (2016) Transcription factors as readers and effectors of DNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet 17:551–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.83
Neri F, Rapelli S, Krepelova A et al (2017) Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation. Nature 543:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21373
Wang X, Hu L, Wang X et al (2016) DNA methylation affects gene alternative splicing in plants: an example from rice. Mol Plant 9:305–307
Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 416:556–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature731
Wollmann H, Stroud H, Yelagandula R et al (2017) The histone H3 variant H3.3 regulates gene body DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol 18:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1221-3
Luo M, Yu CW, Chen FF et al (2012) Histone deacetylase HDA6 is functionally associated with AS1 in repression of KNOX genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 8:e1003114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003114
Kim JM, To TK, Seki M (2012) An epigenetic integrator: new insights into genome regulation, environmental stress responses and developmental controls by histone deacetylase 6. Plant Cell Physiol 53:794–800
Iwasaki M, Takahashi H, Iwakawa H et al (2013) Dual regulation of ETTIN (ARF3) gene expression by AS1-AS2, which maintains the DNA methylation level, is involved in stabilization of leaf adaxial-abaxial partitioning in Arabidopsis. Development 140:1958–1969. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.085365
Blevins T, Pontvianne F, Cocklin R et al (2014) A two-step process for epigenetic inheritance in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 54:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.019
Xu Y-Z, de la Rosa Santamaria R, Virdi KS et al (2012) The chloroplast triggers developmental reprogramming when MUTS HOMOLOG1 is suppressed in plants. Plant Physiol 159:710–720. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.196055
Virdi KS, Laurie JD, Xu YZ et al (2015) Arabidopsis MSH1 mutation alters the epigenome and produces heritable changes in plant growth. Nat Commun 6:6386. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7386
Shao MR, Kumar Kenchanmane Raju S, Laurie JD et al (2017) Stress-responsive pathways and small RNA changes distinguish variable developmental phenotypes caused by MSH1 loss. BMC Plant Biol 17:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0996-4
Jenkinson G, Pujadas E, Goutsias J, Feinberg AP (2017) Potential energy landscapes identify the information-theoretic nature of the epigenome. Nat Genet 49:719–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3811
Jenkinson G, Abante J, Feinberg AP, Goutsias J (2018) An information-theoretic approach to the modeling and analysis of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 19:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2086-5
Hofmeister BT, Lee K, Rohr NA et al (2017) Stable inheritance of DNA methylation allows creation of epigenotype maps and the study of epiallele inheritance patterns in the absence of genetic variation. Genome Biol 18:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1288-x
Taudt A, Roquis D, Vidalis A et al (2018) METHimpute: imputation-guided construction of complete methylomes from WGBS data. BMC Genomics 19:444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4641-x
Tran H, Zhu H, Wu X et al (2018) Identification of differentially methylated sites with weak methylation effects. Genes (Basel) 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9020075
Srivastava A, Karpievitch YV, Eichten SR et al (2019) HOME: a histogram based machine learning approach for effective identification of differentially methylated regions 2. 20(1):253. https://doi.org/10.1101/228221
Sanchez R, Yang X, Kundariya H et al (2018) Enhancing resolution of natural methylome reprogramming behavior in plants. bioRxiv:252106. https://doi.org/10.1101/252106
Becker C, Hagmann J, Müller J et al (2011) Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature 480:245–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10555
Schmitz RJ, Schultz MD, Lewsey MG et al (2011) Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334:369–373. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212959
Sanchez R, Mackenzie SA (2016) Genome-wide discriminatory information patterns of cytosine DNA methylation. Int J Mol Sci 17(6):938. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060938
Sanchez R, Mackenzie SA (2016) Information thermodynamics of cytosine DNA methylation. PLoS One 11:e0150427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150427
Yang X, Kundariya H, Xu Y-Z et al (2015) MutS HOMOLOG1-derived epigenetic breeding potential in tomato. Plant Physiol 168:222–232. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00075
Raju SKK, Shao MR, Sanchez R et al (2018) An epigenetic breeding system in soybean for increased yield and stability. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1836–1847. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12919
Reinders J, Wulff BBH, Mirouze M et al (2009) Compromised stability of DNA methylation and transposon immobilization in mosaic Arabidopsis epigenomes. Genes Dev 23:939–950. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.524609
Lang-Mladek C, Popova O, Kiok K et al (2010) Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 3:594–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq014
Uller T, English S, Pen I (2015) When is incomplete epigenetic resetting in germ cells favoured by natural selection? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0682
Quadrana L, Colot V (2016) Plant transgenerational epigenetics. Annu Rev Genet 50:467–491. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035254
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Yang, X., Mackenzie, S.A. (2020). Approaches to Whole-Genome Methylome Analysis in Plants. In: Spillane, C., McKeown, P. (eds) Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2093. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0178-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0179-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols