Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review Hani J. MarcusThomas P. CundyAra Darzi Review Article 26 June 2013 Pages: 291 - 297
Systematic review of the effect of dynamic fixation systems compared with rigid fixation in the anterior cervical spine Ricardo Rezende CamposRicardo Vieira Botelho Review Article 22 September 2013 Pages: 298 - 304
Surgical techniques for spinopelvic reconstruction following total sacrectomy: a systematic review S. Samuel BedermanKalpit N. ShahNitin N. Bhatia Review Article 23 October 2013 Pages: 305 - 319
Multifidus innervation and muscle assessment post-spinal surgery Derek T. CawleyMichael AlexanderSeamus Morris Original Article 22 August 2013 Pages: 320 - 327
The O-C2 angle established at occipito-cervical fusion dictates the patient’s destiny in terms of postoperative dyspnea and/or dysphagia Masanori IzekiMasashi NeoShuichi Matsuda Original Article 25 August 2013 Pages: 328 - 336
Sacrococcygeal sinus angle: as a new anatomic landmark for the posterior approach of presacral lesions Metin KaplanSait OzturkFatih Serhat Erol Original Article 17 May 2013 Pages: 337 - 340
Outcomes of surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy accompanying local kyphosis (comparison between laminoplasty alone and posterior reconstruction surgery using the screw-rod system) Hiroshi MiyamotoKoichiro MaenoMasatoshi Sumi Original Article 02 August 2013 Pages: 341 - 346
Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study Glenn R. ButtermannTague M. ThorsonWilliam J. Mullin Original Article 02 October 2013 Pages: 347 - 355
Anterior pedicle screw fixation of C2: an anatomic analysis of axis morphology and simulated surgical fixation Zeng-Hui WuYi ZhengYi-Hong Yin Original Article 28 September 2013 Pages: 356 - 361
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xuzhou LiuShaoxiong MinAnmin Jin Original Article 05 October 2013 Pages: 362 - 372
Circumspinal decompression and fusion through a posterior midline incision to treat central calcified thoracolumbar disc herniation: a minimal 2-year follow-up study with reconstruction CT Ning LiuZhongqiang ChenZhaoqing Guo Original Article Open access 05 October 2013 Pages: 373 - 381
Treatment of cervical disc herniation through percutaneous minimally invasive techniques Bo YangJingkai XieShengyu Wan Original Article 19 October 2013 Pages: 382 - 388
Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database Hiroyuki YoshiharaDaisuke Yoneoka Original Article 09 November 2013 Pages: 389 - 394
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis Wenbin DingYile ChenZhaomin Zheng Original Article 22 November 2013 Pages: 395 - 403
Clinical and radiological presentation of spinal epidural haemangiomas: clinical series in a tertiary care centre during a 10-year period Mario MühmerRichard BostelmannJan Frederick Cornelius Review Article 06 October 2013 Pages: 404 - 410
Clinical characteristics and treatment options for two types of osteoblastoma in the mobile spine: a retrospective study of 32 cases and outcomes Huabin YinWang ZhouJianru Xiao Original Article 01 October 2013 Pages: 411 - 416
Spinal angiolipoma: etiology, imaging findings, classification, treatment, and prognosis Yu SiZhenyu WangTao Yu Original Article 05 November 2013 Pages: 417 - 425
Factors influencing arthrodesis rates in a rabbit posterolateral spine model with iliac crest autograft Jason H. GhodasraErika L. DaleyWellington K. Hsu Review Article 29 October 2013 Pages: 426 - 434
A rat model for chronic spinal nerve root compression Feng XueYouzhen WeiLingjun Gao Original Article 19 October 2013 Pages: 435 - 446
Upregulated expression of PERK in spinal ligament fibroblasts from the patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament Yu ChenXinwei WangDeyu Chen Original Article 07 October 2013 Pages: 447 - 454
Selective estrogen receptor modulation prevents scoliotic curve progression: radiologic and histomorphometric study on a bipedal C57Bl6 mice model Gokhan DemirkiranOzgur DedeEmre Acaroglu Original Article 18 October 2013 Pages: 455 - 462
Evaluation of behavior and expression of NaV1.7 in dorsal root ganglia after sciatic nerve compression and application of nucleus pulposus in rats Michiaki MukaiYoshihiro SakumaSeiji Ohtori Original Article 20 November 2013 Pages: 463 - 468
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Svend Lings entitled “Antibiotics for low back pain?” concerning “Antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and vertebral bone edema (Modic type 1 changes): a double-blind randomized controlled trial of efficacy” by Albert HB et al., Eur Spine J (2013) 22:697–707 Hanne B. AlbertClaus Manniche Letter to the Editor 21 September 2013 Pages: 473 - 476
Comment on Abdallah et al. entitled “Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis” Mingbo TianMingsheng ZhangShoufeng Li Letter to the Editor 12 October 2013 Pages: 477 - 477
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Mingbo Tian et al. concerning “Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis” by D.Y. Abdallah, M.M. Jadaan and J.P. McCabe; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2890-6 Dima Y. AbdallahMutaz M. JadaanJohn P. McCabe Author's Reply 14 September 2013 Pages: 478 - 479
“Overviews” should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews Francisco M. KovacsGerard UrrútiaJosé Domingo Alarcón Letter to the Editor 12 October 2013 Pages: 480 - 480
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled “Overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews” concerning “The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews” by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4 Wilco C. H. JacobsSidney M. RubinsteinMaurits W. van Tulder Author's Reply 24 September 2013 Pages: 481 - 482
Anular closure device: is it necessary after discectomy? Yusuf Izci Letter to the Editor 21 September 2013 Pages: 483 - 484
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Dr. Yusuf Izci entitled “Anular closure device: Is it necessary after discectomy?” concerning “The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device” by G. J. Bouma, M. Barth, D. Ledic, M. Vilendecic (2013) Eur Spine J; 22(5):1030–1036 Gerrit J. Bouma Author's Reply 26 September 2013 Pages: 485 - 485
Comment on Zhu et al. entitled “Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis” Ning ZhuDong XieYong Wang Letter to the Editor 14 November 2013 Pages: 486 - 486
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Ning Zhu et al. entitled “Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis” (by Bin Zhu, Yilan Xu, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhongjun Liu, Gengting Dang (2013) Eur Spine J 22(7); 1583–1593) Bin ZhuXiaoguang Liu Author's Reply 08 November 2013 Pages: 487 - 488
Erratum to: Negative beliefs and psychological disturbance in spine surgery patients: a cause or consequence of a poor treatment outcome? S. HavakeshianA. F. Mannion Erratum 09 November 2013 Pages: 489 - 489
