Radioelectronics and Communications Systems

ISSN: 0735-2727 (Print) 1934-8061 (Online)

Description

Radioelectronics and Communications Systems  covers urgent theoretical problems of radio-engineering; results of research efforts, leading experience, which determines directions and development of scientific research in radio engineering and radio electronics; publishes materials of scientific conferences and meetings; information on scientific work in higher educational institutions; newsreel and bibliographic materials. Journal publishes articles in the following sections:

  • Antenna-feeding and microwave devices;
  • Vacuum and gas-discharge devices;
  • Solid-state electronics and integral circuit engineering;
  • Optical radar, communication and information processing systems;
  • Use of computers for research and design of radio-electronic devices and systems;
  • Quantum electronic devices;
  • Design of radio-electronic devices;
  • Radar and radio navigation;
  • Radio engineering devices and systems;
  • Radio engineering theory;
  • Medical radioelectronics.

PEER REVIEW

Radioelectronics and Communications Systems is a peer reviewed journal. We use a double blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 100 reviewers, both internal and external (75%), from 9 countries (Ukraine, Russia, Poland, Egypt, Germany, United Kingdom, Denmark, Mexico, USA). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 100 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 60 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 30%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board or the Editor-in-Chief.

Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.

Browse Volumes & Issues