Skip to main content

A Method for Producing Cloned Pigs by Using Somatic Cells as Donors

  • Protocol

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 254))

Abstract

Nuclear transfer (NT) is a procedure by which genetically identical individuals can be created. The applications of these NT techniques will be in agriculture, biomedicine, and basic research. Based on the source of donor cells, NT can be classified into embryonic cell NT and somatic cell NT. Somatic cell NT was first reported in 1996 (1) and includes more practical applications. Most importantly, it provides a promising method for producing transgenic animals. This concept is exemplified by the generation of transgenic sheep (2), pigs (3,4) and calves (5), along with gene-targeted sheep (6) and pigs (7), derived from NT approaches by using transfected somatic cells. For pigs, somatic cell NT has another specific significance, as it allows the use of genetic modification procedures to produce tissues and organs from cloned pigs with reduced immunogenicity for use in xenotransplantation (7). However, when measured as development to term as a proportion of oocytes used, the efficiency of somatic cell NT, has been very low (1–2%). Several variables influence the ability to reproduce a specific genotype by cloning. These include species, source of recipient ova, cell type of nuclei donor, treatment of donor cells prior to NT, the method of artificial oocyte activation, embryo culture, possible loss of somatic imprinting in the nuclei of reconstructed embryos, failure of adequate reprogramming of the transplanted nucleus, and the techniques employed for NT. In some species (e.g., pigs) there is an additional difficulty in that at least four good embryos are required to induce and maintain pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Campbell, K. H., McWhir, J., Ritchie, W. A., and Wilmut, I. (1996) Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380, 64–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnieke, A. E., Kind, A. J., Ritchie, W. A., Mycock, K., Scott, A. R., Ritchie, M., et al. (1997) Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 278, 2130–2133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Park, K. W., Cheong, H. T., Lai, L., Kühholzer, B., Samuel, M., Bonk, A., et al. (2001) Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anim. Biotechnol. 12, 173–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai, L., Park, K. W., Cheong, H. T., Kühholzer, B., Samuel, M., Bonk, A., et al. (2002) A transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicine-treated fibroblasts as donor cells. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 62, 300–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cibelli, J. B., Stice, S. L., Golueke, P. J., Kane, J. J., Jerry, J., Blackwell, C., et al. (1998) Transgenic bovine chimeric offspring produced from somatic cell-derived stem-like cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 642–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCreath, K. L., Howcroft, J., Campbell, K. H., Colman, A., Schnieke, A. E., and Kind, A. J. (2000) Production of gene-targeted sheep by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells. Nature 405, 1066–1069.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai, L., Kolber-Simonds, D., Park, K. W., Cheong, H. T., Greenstein, J. L., Im, G. S., et al. (2002) Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 295, 1089–1092.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wakayama, T. and Yanagimachi, R. (2001) Mouse cloning with nucleus donor cells of different age and type. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 58, 376–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kato, Y., Tani, T., and Tsunoda, Y. (2000) Cloning of calves from various somatic cell types of male and female adult, newborn and fetal cows. Reprod. Fertil. 120, 231–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polejaeva, I. A., Chen, S. H., Vaught, T. D., Page, R. L., Mullins, J., Ball S., et al. (2000) Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407, 505–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abeydeera, L. R., Wang, W. H., Cantley, T. C., Rieke, A., Murphy, C. N., Prather, R. S., and Day, B. N. (2000) Development and viability of pig oocytes matured in a protein-free medium containing epidermal growth factor. Theriogenology 54, 787–797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kühholzer, B., Hawley, R. J., Lai, L., Kolber-Simonds, D., and Prather, R. S. (2001) Clonal lines of transgenic fibroblast cells derived from the same fetus result in different development when used for nuclear transfer in pigs. Biol. Reprod. 64, 1695–1698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilmut, I., Schniek, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J., and Campbell, K. H. (1997) Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385, 810–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cibelli, J. B., Stice, S. L., Golueke, P. J., Kane, J. J., Jerry, J., Blackwell, C., et al. (1998) Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblast. Science 280, 1256–1258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheong, H. T., Takahashi, Y., and Kanagawa, H. (1993) Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 48, 958–963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, L., Dai, Y., and Moor, R. M. (1997) Nuclear transfer in sheep embryos: The effect of cell cycle coordination between nucleus and cytoplasm and use of in vitromatured oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 47, 255–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wakayama, T., Rodriguez, I., Perry, A. C., Yanagimachi, R., and Mombaerts, P. (1999) Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14984–14989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou, Q., Jouneau, A., Brochard, V., Adenot P., and Renard, J. P. (2001) Developmental potential of mouse embryos reconstructed from metaphase embryonic stem cell nuclei. Biol. Reprod. 65, 412–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amano, T., Tani, T, Kato, Y., and Tsunoda, Y. (2001) Mouse cloned from embryonic stem (ES) cells synchronized in metaphase with nocodazole. J. Exp. Zool. 289, 139–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Machaty, Z., Wang, W. H., Day, B. N., and Prather, R. S. (1997) Complete activation of porcine oocytes induced by the sulfhydryl reagent, thimerosal. Biol. Reprod. 57, 1123–1127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Betthauser, J., Forsberg, E., Augenstein, M., Childs, L., Eilertsen, K., Enos, J., et al. (2000) Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1055–1059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai, Y., Vaught, T. D., Boone, J., Chen, S. H., Phelps, C. J., Ball, S., Monahan, J. A., Jobst, P. M., McCreath, K. J., Lamborn, A. E., Cowell-Lucero, J. L., Wells, K. D., Colman, A., Polejaeva, I. A., and Ayares, D. L. (2002) Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 251–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Polge, C., Rowson, L. E., and Chang M. C. (1966) The effect of reducing the number of embryos during early stages of gestation on the maintenance of pregnancy in the pig. Reprod. Fertil. 12, 395–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dominko, T., Chan, A., Simerly, C., Luetjens, C. M., Hewitson, L., Martinovich C., and Schatten, G. (2000) Dynamic imaging of the metaphase II spindle and maternal chromosomes in bovine oocytes: implications for enucleation efficiency verification, avoidance of parthenogenesis, and successful embryogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 62, 150–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tao, T., Machaty, Z., Abeydeera, L. R., Day, B. N., and Prather, R. S. (2000) Optimisation of porcine oocyte activation following nuclear transfer. Zygote 8, 69–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. De Sousa, P. A., Dobrinsky, J. R., Zhu, J., Archibald, A. L, Ainslie, A., Bosma, W., et al. (2002) Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the pig: control of pronuclear formation and integration with improved methods for activation and maintenance of pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 66, 642–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lai, L., Prather, R.S. (2004). A Method for Producing Cloned Pigs by Using Somatic Cells as Donors. In: Schatten, H. (eds) Germ Cell Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 254. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-741-6:149

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-741-6:149

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-257-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-741-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics