Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Medicine ((MIMM,volume 37))

  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

Until today, gene transfer to germ cells has been attempted by a variety of methods including microinjection, embryonic stem cell-mediated transfection, virus mediated transfection, lipofection (1), microparticle bombardment (2), and sperm mediated transformation (3). In vivo gene electroporation (EP) now is a viable option for gene transfer purposes as demonstrated by strong shortterm gene expression and long-term expression after gene transfer (4,5 and unpublished). In vivo gene EP is simple and convenient. Adequate development and differentiation of transfected cells can be maintained in the in vivo environment. Furthermore, it can be applied, in principle, to any types of cells and tissues so long as the target is accessible. The advantages of in vivo EP over other nonviral methods such as lipofection and microparticle bombardment are: possible tissue damage is less; there is no limitation of DNA to be transfected at a time; and DNA can be transferable to cells deep inside the target tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Northlop, J. P., Ringlod, G. M., and Danielsen, M. (1987) Lipofection: A highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 7413–7417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, R. S., Johnston, S. A., Reidy, M., de Vit, M. J., McElligott, S. G., and Sanford, J. C. (1991) Introduction of foreign genes into tissues of living mice by DNA-coated microprojectiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 2726–2730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lauria, A. and Gandolfi, F. (1993) Recent advances in sperm cell mediated gene transfer. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36, 255–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishi, T., Yoshizato, K., Yamashiro, S., Takeshima, H., Sato, K., Hamada, K., Kitamura, I., Yoshimura, T., Saya, H., Kuratsu, J., and Ushio, Y. (1996) Highefficiency in vivo gene transfer using intraarterial plasmid DNA injection following in vivo electroporation. Cancer Res. 56, 1050–1055.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Muramatsu, T., Nakamura, A., and Park, H.-M. (1998) In vivo electroporation: A powerful and convenient means of nonviral gene transfer to tissues of living animals. Int. J. Mol. Med. 1, 55–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muramatsu, T., Shibata, O., and Okumura, J. (1997) Effect of self-replication DNA sequences of Epstein-Barr virus on the expression of a foreign gene transfected in vivo to the mouse testis. Anim. Sci. Technol. Jpn. 68, 650–653.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Muramatsu, T., Shibata, O., and Okumura, J. (1997) Foreign gene expression in the mouse testis by localized in vivo gene transfer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 233, 45–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura, A., Okumura, J., and Muramatsu, T. (1998) Quantitative analysis of transcriptional activity of viral and hybrid promoters in bovine preimplantation embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 49, 368–373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muramatsu, T., Mizutani, Y., Ohmori, Y., and Okumura J. (1996) In vivo electroporation: a convenient method for gene transfer to testicular cells in mice. Anim. Sci. Technol. Jpn. 67, 975–982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Okabe, M., Ikawa, M., Kominami, K., Nakanishi, T., and Nishimune, Y. (1997) ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 407, 313–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shoji-Tanaka, A., Mizuochi, T., and Komuro, K. (1994) Gene transfer using purified retroviral integrase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 1756–1764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauer, C. A., Getty, R. R., and Tykocinski, M. L. (1989) Epstein-Barr virus episome-based promoter function in human myeloid cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 1989–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pothier, F., Ouellet, M., Julien, J.-P., and Guerin, S. L. (1992) An improved CAT assay for promoter analysis in either transgenic mice or tissue culture cells. DNA Cell Biol. 11, 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders, M. M. and McKnight, G. S. (1988) Positive and negative regulatory elements control the steroid-responsive ovalbumin promoter. Biochemistry 27, 6550–6557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofmann, G. A. (1995) Instrumentation. Methods Mol. Biol. 47, 27–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Muramatsu, T. (2000). In Vivo Gene Electroporation in the Mouse Testis. In: Jaroszeski, M.J., Heller, R., Gilbert, R. (eds) Electrochemotherapy, Electrogenetherapy, and Transdermal Drug Delivery. Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol 37. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-080-2:349

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-080-2:349

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-606-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-080-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics