Skip to main content
Log in

Spice-Models with Independent Agents

  • Mathematical Game Theory and Applications
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the models of social and private interests coordination engines (SPICE-models) with equal independent agents are studied. The existence and uniqueness of Nash and Pareto-optimal equilibria are proved. These equilibria satisfy resource monotonicity (RM) but not population monotonicity (PM) and anonymity (ANO). Also a result on the system compatibility of the model is established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burkov, V.N. and Kondrat'ev, V.V., Mekhanizmy funktsionirovaniya organizatsionnykh sistem (Mechanisms of Functioning of Organizational Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Germeier, Yu.B. and Vatel', I.A., Games with the Bierarchical Vector of Interests, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Tekh. Kibern., 1974, no. 3, pp. 54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., Interests Coordination Mechanisms in Resource Allocation Model, Sist. Upravlen. Inform. Tekhn., 2014, no. 57(3.2), pp. 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., Models of Social and Private Interests Coordination in Control Systems, XII Vserossiiskoe soveshchanie po prohlemam upravleniya (VSPU-2014) (XII All-Russia Meeting on Control Problems), Inst. Probl. Upravl., 2014, pp. 5282–5289.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., Models of Social and Private Interests Coordination. I: System Compatibility, Econom. Menedzh. Sist. Upravlen., 2017, no. 4.1(26), pp. 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., Price of Anarchy and Control Mechanisms in Models of Social and Private Interests Coordination, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–73.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorelik, V.A., Gorelov, M.A., and Kononenko, A.F., Analiz konfliktnykh situatsii v sistemakh upravleniya (Analysis of Conflicts in Control Systems), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz', 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., Models of Concordance of Public and Private Interests in Control Systems, Contribut. Game Theory Manage., 2015, vol. 8, pp. 47–57.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorbaneva, O.I. and Ougolnitsky, G.A., System Compatibility, Price of Anarchy and Control Mechanisms in the Models of Concordance of Private and Public Interests, Adv. Syst. Sci. AppL, 2015, vol. 15(1), pp. 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin, H. and Thomson, W., Can Everyone Benefit from Growth? Two Difficulties, J. Math. Econom., 1988, vol. 17, pp. 339–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Papadimitriou, C.H., Algorithms, Games, and the Internet, Proc. 33th Symposium on Theory of Computing, Heraklion, Greece, 2001, pp. 749–753.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-010-00594.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. I. Gorbaneva.

Additional information

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2018, published in Matematicheskaya Teoriya Igr i Prilozheniya, 2018, No. 4, pp. 3–15.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorbaneva, O.I. Spice-Models with Independent Agents. Autom Remote Control 80, 1745–1753 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117919090145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117919090145

Keywords

Navigation