Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the AMYR calculating method on quinoxaline, 3-chloroquinoxaline, and 3-methylquinoxaline in the interaction with n water molecules (n varies from 1 to 6)

  • Published:
Journal of Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AMYR is a computer program for the calculation of molecular associations using Fraga’s pairwise atomatom potential. The interaction energy is evaluated through a 1/R expansion. A pairwise dispersion energy term is included in the potential and corrected by a damping function. The program carries out energy minimizations through variable metric methods. The new version allows for the stationary point analysis of the intermolecular potential by means of the Hessian eigenvalues. AMYR model is used for the first time in a calculation of quinoxaline, 3-chloroquinoxaline, and 3-methylquinoxaline molecules interacting with some water molecules. Intermolecular interaction energies are obtained and the stable conformation is determined in each case. The change conformation was considered at α ≅ (CNC) angle when the solute molecules are surrounded by n water molecules (1 ≤ n ≤ 6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Csikos, G. G. Ferenczy, J. G. Angyan, Z. Bocskei, K. Simon, C. Gonczi, and I. Hermecz, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2119–2125 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. A. Khan, K. Saleem, and Z. Khan, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 43, 2257 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. K. Tandon, D. B. Yadav, H. K. Maurya, A. K. v, and P. K. Shukla, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 14, 6120 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Sandeep and B. S. Devanand, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 16, 6181 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. V. Labarbera and E. B. Skibo, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 13, 387 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Michelson, E. J. Jacobsen, D. B. Carter, H. K. Im, W. B. Im, P. J. K. D. Schreur, V. H. Sethy, A. H. Tang, J. E. McGee, and J. D. Petke, J. Med. Chem., 39, 4654 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Sarges and J. W. Lyga, J. Hetercycl. Chem., 25, 1475 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. S. Kim, L. Qian, J. E. Bird, K. E. Dickinson, S. Moreland, T. R. Schaeffer, T. L. Waldron, C. L. Delany, H. N. Weller, and A. V. Miller, J. Med. Chem., 36, 4923 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Csipo, G. Szabo, and F. Sztaricskai, Magy. Kem. Faly, 97, 143 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. Kulagowski, Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 6, 1069–1079 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. D. Leeson and L. L. Iversen, J. Med. Chem., 37, 4053–4067 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Ohmori, M. Shimizu-Sasamata, M. Okada, and S. Sakamoto, J. Med. Chem., 40, 2053–2063 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Bata, S. Bathori, J. Bencze, Zs. Bocskei, E. Csikos, S. Erdo, Cs. Gonczi, I. Hermecz, G. Heja, V. Lakics, Cs. Majlath, P. Molnar, B. Podanyi, I. Ritz, A. Csutor-Santa, A. Szappanos-Szoke, and I. Szvoboda, WO 97, 19, 934 1997; Chem. Abstr., 127, 95295c (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yingjun Xu, Fanhong Wu, Zhiyi Yao, Minmin Zhang, and Sheng Jiang, J. Molecules, 16, 6894–6901 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Unified Set of Parameters, 1–30, J. Comput. Chem., 3, 329 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. General Set of Parameters, 1–30, Comput. Phys. Commun., 29, 351 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Unified Set of Parameters, 31–61, J. Comput. Chem., 5, 261 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Unified Set of Parameters, 62–82, J. Comput. Chem., 7, 55 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Fraga, J. Comput. Chem., 3, 329–334 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. J. Dewar, D. M. Storch, E. G. Zoebish, E. F. Healy, and J. J. P. Stewart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 3902 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Fraga, J. Comput. Phys. Commun., 29, 351–359 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Clementi, F. Cavallone, and R. Scordamaglia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 5531 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Scordamaglia, F. Cavallone, and E. Clementi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 5545 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. El Assyry.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © 2014 A. El Assyry, B. Benali, A. Boucetta, B. Lakhrissi.

The text was submitted by the authors in English. Zhurnal Strukturnoi Khimii, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 43–49, January–February, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El Assyry, A., Benali, B., Boucetta, A. et al. Application of the AMYR calculating method on quinoxaline, 3-chloroquinoxaline, and 3-methylquinoxaline in the interaction with n water molecules (n varies from 1 to 6). J Struct Chem 55, 38–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476614010065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476614010065

Keyword

Navigation