Abstract
Oscar Wilde’s comedies of manners—also known, especially in academic circles, as his “Society Plays”—are late nineteenth-century manifestations of Menander’s ancient Greek comedies and the Roman comedies of Plautus and Terrence. Though Shakespeare appeared to dabble in the form, it was with Restoration comedy that for a number of decades the comedy of manners became the dominant form of theatrical comedy. There are a number of direct links between Restoration comedies and Wilde’s comedies of manners, as both concern themselves with the aristocracy, have convoluted plots, have foppish characters (born again as the “dandy” in Wilde’s plays, and then conflated with the “rake,” as well, in Algernon), and are generally satirical in nature. But while both Restoration comedies and Wilde’s incarnation of the form are comedies of manners, are Wilde’s comedies really that much like those written by Molière, Congreve, Wycherley, Sheridan, and the like? In what way did Wilde make the comedy of manners his own? Or maybe a more appropriate question is, was Wilde actually writing comedies of manners?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael Y. Bennett, “Introduction: Salome as Anomaly?” Refiguring Oscar Wilde’s Salome, ed. Michael Y. Bennett (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2011), vii.
Peter Raby, “Wilde’s Comedies of Society,” The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde, ed. Peter Raby (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 143–60.
Michael Y Bennett, Words, Space, and the Audience: The Theatrical Tension between Empiricism and Rationalism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 56.
Edmund Miller, “Renaming Algernon,” Oscar Wilde: The Man, His Writings, and His World, ed. Robert N. Keane (New York: AMS Press, 2003), 215.
For more on Victorian ideals, see J. H. Buckley, The Victorian Temper: A Study in Literary Culture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964)
and Walter E. Houghton, The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956).
Peter Raby, The Importance of Being Earnest: A Reader’s Companion (New York: Twayne, 1995), 51.
Peter Raby, “‘The Persons of the Play’: Some Reflections on Wilde’s Choice of Names in The Importance of Being Earnest,” Nineteenth Century Theatre 23.1–3 (1995): 67–75.
Michael Y Bennett, “A Wilde Performance: Bunburying and ‘Bad Faith’ in Salome and The Importance of Being Earnest,” Refiguring Oscar Wilde’s Salome, ed. Michael Y Bennett (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2011), 167.
Oscar Wilde, “The Importance of Being Earnest,” The Importance of Being Earnest and Other Plays, ed. Peter Raby (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 262.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Michael Y. Bennett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bennett, M.Y. (2015). Introduction: The Importance of Laughing in Earnest. In: Bennett, M.Y. (eds) Oscar Wilde’s Society Plays. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410931_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410931_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56827-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41093-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)