Skip to main content
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

In the 2009 British political satire, In the Loop, one line in particular stands out in a screenplay that was nominated for an Academy Award. When a British minister inadvertently ignites speculation of an imminent war with an undisclosed Middle Eastern country, his meeting with American officials at the British foreign office is hastily arranged. Speaking on the phone about who will likely be attending, the British “director of diplomacy” remarks they needn’t worry about the Canadians as “they’re just happy to be there. They always look surprised when they’re invited.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lisa Taylor, “Opinion: A rough lesson in civics,” Toronto Star, Wednesday, July 14, 2010. www.thestar.com.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The violence perpetrated by police, however, was reported in the New York Times and the Guardian (with a reporter from the latter having been beaten and arrested despite showing police his press credentials). See Ian Austen, “Police in Toronto criticized for treatment of protesters, many peaceful,” The New York Times, Sunday, June 27, 2010, www.nytimes.com;

    Google Scholar 

  3. and John Hilary, “May Toronto’s G20 be the last,” The Guardian, Sunday, June 27, 2010, www.theguardian.co.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert E. Denton, Jr. “Television as an instrument of war,” in Denton, ed., The Media and the Persian Gulf War (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brendan Kennedy, “G20 police action ‘unjustified’,” Toronto Star, Saturday, June 25, 2011, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Megan Cotton-Kinch, “Journalism & democracy”, Speak Up! Speak Out! Public Dialogue and the Politics of Dissent conference presentation, Wilfrid Laurier University, Saturday, March, 19, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Catherine Bush, The Rules of Engagement (Toronto: HarperFlamingo Canada, 2000), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William E. Connolly, Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1991), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nevzat Soguk, States and Strangers: Refugees and Displacements of Statecraft (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), pp.18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Standford University Press, 1998), pp. 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allan Thompson, “Chretien condemns Canadian’s execution, rift with Vietnam widens as Ottawa steps up pressure,” Toronto Star, May 2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Dillon and Julian Reid, “Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency,” Alternatives, January 25, 2000, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jenny Edkins, “Sovereign power, zones of indistinction, and the camp,” Alternatives, January 25, 2000, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quoted in Kathleen Kenna, “Faulder gets last minute reprieve,” Toronto Star, Thursday December 10, 1998, p. A12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Valerie Lawton, “B.C. pair take extradition fight to Supreme Court,” Toronto Star, Wednesday, May 24, 2000, p. A2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid. See also, Janice Tibbetts, “Supreme Court gives intervenor status to Italy,” The National Post, April 17, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tracy Lamourie quoted in Brian Shields, “Baby killer looks to Canada for mercy,” The Beacon News, Saturday, October 7, 2000. See http://ccadp.org/news2000.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Kirk Makin, “Top court speaks out against execution,” Globe and Mail, Friday, February 16, 2001, pp. A1, A9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See William Safire, “K angaroo Courts,” The New York Times, November 26, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joan Bryden, “Tories deny hidden agenda on death penalty,” Globe and Mail, November 3, 2007, p. A4. Also see “Tories abandon Canadians on death rows,” Toronto Star, November 1, 2007, www.thestar.com.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See “Canadian on death row suing Tory government,” The Globe and Mail, November 28, 2007, p. A7; and Kirk Martin, “Death-row killer in U.S. turns to Canadian court,” The Globe and Mail, March 4, 2008, p. A5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell Clark and Colin Frieze, “Canada to aid man in Saudi jail,” The Globe and Mail, March 5, 2008, p. A7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garfield Pardy, quoted in Kirk Makin, “Ottawa’s stand on clemency bids decried,” The Globe and Mail, March 5, 2008, p. A7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quoted in Galloway “Ottawa hurting case of Canadian facing beheading, MPs say,” The Globe and Mail, March 4, 2008, p. A5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Patricia Molloy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molloy, P. (2012). Introduction. In: Canada/US and Other Unfriendly Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031457_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics