Skip to main content
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

The Anglo-Egyptian agreement on the Sudan sealed the Suez Group’s determination to oppose Eden’s ‘appeasement’ of the Cairo regime. In the succeeding seventeen months, these MPs conducted a highly public campaign to obstruct Eden’s answer to the problem posed by Britain’s straitened finances on her position in the Middle East. Eden’s argument throughout remained that the presence of troops in the Suez Canal Zone was a heavy political and military liability, and served no useful purpose.1 Britain needed access to base and transit facilities in peacetime and the right of re-entry in wartime, and this could only be done with Egypt’s agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Sue Onslow

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Onslow, S. (1997). Negotiating the withdrawal from the Suez Canal Zone base 1953–54. In: Backbench Debate within the Conservative Party and its Influence on British Foreign Policy, 1948–57. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378940_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics