Abstract
From the beginning, nineteenth-century European liberalism was defined by its contradictions. There were contradictions within liberal attitudes to the past, among liberal ideas about present-day tactics, and even in liberal projects for the future. This is why it has been so hard to define liberalism. Historians have even had trouble deciding whether liberalism should be considered a “left-wing” or a “right-wing” movement — as did nineteenth-century observers. Much depends on how left-wing and right-wing are defined, of course, but to give an example, when the nineteenth-century left and right are described as the confident vs the anxious, liberalism will forever remain in limbo, for the reason that liberals were, by definition, both.1 They were both the confident heirs of Voltaire and the frightened successors of Robespierre.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Alan Kahan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kahan, A.S. (2003). Introduction: Defining Liberalism. In: Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937643_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937643_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51078-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3764-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)