Abstract
Legitimacy is one of the most frequently used and misused concepts in political science. Legitimacy usually enters the analytical picture when it is missing or deficient.1 Legitimacy can roughly be understood as the right to govern — that one ought to have the authority to get things done. It can be considered metaphorically equivalent to a reservoir of water: as long it stays at a certain level, it can be maintained, but if it falls below a certain level, there is the risk that all will be lost.2 Max Weber believes that every such system attempts to establish and to cultivate the belief in “legitimacy.”3 In China’s case, Tong Yanqi contends that no country concerns regime legitimacy more than China does and no country has removed illegitimate regimes more times than China has.4 Elizabeth Perry and Mark Selden argue that Chinese history boasts a record of resistance and rebellion second to none.5 Guo Baogang, a Chinese American political scientist, states that the enduring question in political development in China today is no different from what was sought after throughout Chinese history, namely, the constant search for political legitimacy.6
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Philippe C. Schmitter, “What Is Legitimacy and How Can It Be Acquired? Lessons from Deviant Case,” in Deng Zhenglai and Sujian Guo, eds., Reviving Legitimacy: Lessons for and from China (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield-Lexington, 2011), 29.
Robert A. Dahl, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971), 124–88.
Max Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. Talcott Parsons (New York: The Free Press, 1964), 325.
Yanqi Tong, “Morality, Benevolence, and Responsibility: Regime Legitimacy in China from Past to the Present,” Journal of Chinese Political Science, 16, no. 2 (June 2011): 145.
Baogang Guo, China’s Quest for Political Legitimacy: The New Equity-Enhancing Politics (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010), 184.
Karl Bünger, “Concluding Remarks on Two Aspects of the Chinese Unitary State as Compared with the European State System,” in Stuart R. Schram, ed., Foundations and Limits of State Power in China (London: School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London, 1987), 316.
Yanqi Tong and Shaohua Lei, Social Protest in Contemporary China, 2003–2010: Transitional Pains and Regime Legitimacy (New York: Routledge, 2013), 27.
Yu Keping, “Zhongguo zhengzhixue de jincheng” [The Development of Political Science in China], Xueshu Yuekan [Academic Monthly], 39, no. 11 (2007): 5–11.
Zhang Qiang and Robert Weatherley, “The Rise of ‘Republican Fever’ in the PRC and the Implications for CCP Legitimacy,” China Information, 27, no. 3 (2013): 281.
Rey-Ching Lu, Chinese Democracy and Elite Thinking (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 61.
Yu Keping, “Shibada zhihou de zhongguo: gaige guanjianqi” [China after the 18th Party Congress: A Crucial Period], Zhehuizhuyi Yanju [Research on Socialism], no. 2 (2013): 1–11.
Wang Shaoguang, “Is the Way of Humane Authority a Good Thing,” in Jiang Qing, ed., A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 141–47.
Daniel A. Bell, “Introduction,” in Jiang Qing, A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 16.
Jie Chen, Popular Political Support in Urban China (Stanford: Stanford University Press and Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2004).
Kjeld Erik Brodsgaard and Zheng Yongnian, eds., The Chinese Communist Party in Reform (New York: Routledge, 2006), 2.
Shanding Zhou, “Changes in the Official Ideology in Contemporary China,” Griffith Asia Institute Regional Outlook Paper, no. 29 (2011).
Robert Weatherley, Politics in China Since 1949: Legitimizing Authoritarian Rule (New York: Routledge, 2013), 14.
Yu Jianrong, “Social Conflict in Rural China Today: Observations and Analysis on Farmers’ Struggles to Safeguard Their Rights,” Social Sciences in China, 26, no. 3 (Autumn 2005): 125–36.
Xie Yue, “Rising Central Spending on Public Security and the Dilemma Facing Grassroots Officials in China,” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42, no. 2 (2013): 87–9.
Andrew Jacobs and Chris Buckley, “China’s Wen Warns of Inequality and Vows to Continue Military Buildup,” New York Times, 5 March 2013.
Bruce Gilley and Heike Holbig, “The Debate on Party Legitimacy in China: A Mixed Quantitative/Qualitative Analysis,” Journal of Contemporary China, 18, no. 59 (March 2009): 341.
Wang Changjiang, “Zhongshi dui ‘dangde liyi’ wenti de yanjiu” [Emphasizing the Research on the “Interest of the Party”], Makesi Zhuyi yu Xianshi [Marxism & Reality], no. 4 (2004): 4–7.
Chris Buckley, “Vows of Change in China Belie Private Warning,” New York Times, 14 February 2013.
David Easton, A System of Analysis of Political Life (New York: Wiley, 1967), 301–02.
Kerry Brown, “The Communist Party of China and Ideology,” China: An International Journal, 10, no. 2 (August 2012): 52–68.
Peter Moody, Tradition and Modernization in China and Japan (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1995), 172.
Diana Lary, “The Uses of the Past: History and Legitimacy,” in Andre Laliberte and Marc Lanteigne, eds., The Chinese Party-State in the 21st Century: Adaptation and the Reinvention of Legitimacy (London: Routledge, 2008), 133.
Pramit Pal Chaudhuri and Reshma Patil, “China, the Nervous Dragon,” Hindustan Times, 11 October 2010.
Kang Xiaoguang, “Falungong wenti de zhengzhi xiaoying” [The Political Effect of the Falun Gong Problem], Zhongguo shehui daokan [Guide to Chinese Society], no. 33 (2000).
Kang Liu, Globalization and Cultural Trend in China (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2003), 129.
Yu Keping, “Good Governance and Legitimacy,” in Deng Zhenglai and Sujian Guo, eds., China’s Search for Good Governance (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 15.
Dingxin Zhao, “The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China.” American Behavioral Scientist, 53, no. 3 (November 2009): 416.
Dingxin Zhao, The Power of Tiananmen: State-Society Relations and the 1989 Beijing Student Movement (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001).
Baogang Guo, “Political Legitimacy and China’s Transition Towards a Market Economy,” in Lowell Dittmer and Guoli Liu, eds., China’s Deep Reform: Domestic Politics in Transition (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2006), 154.
Baogang Guo, “Political Legitimacy a China’s Transition,” Journal of Chinese Political Studies, 8, no. 1–2 (Fall 2003): 1–16.
Zheng Yongnian, Globalization and State Transformation in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 41.
Yuchao Zhu, “‘Performance Legitimacy’ and China’s Political Adaptation Strategy,” Journal of Chinese Political Science, 16 (February 2011): 136.
Jiang Qing, “From Mind Confucianism to Political Confucianism,” in Ruiping Fan, ed., The Renaissance of Confucianism in Contemporary China (New York: Springer, 2011), 24.
Ruiping Fan, “Jiang Qing on Equality,” in Ruiping Fan, ed., The Renaissance of Confucianism in Contemporary China (New York: Springer, 2011), 64.
Peter Sandby-Thomas, Legitimating the Chinese Communist Party since Tiananmen: A Critical Analysis of the Stability Discourse (London: Routledge, 2011), 7.
Yu Keping, “Good Governance and Legitimacy,” in Deng Zhenglai and Sujian Guo, eds., China’s Search for Good Governance (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 6.
Huang Jingjing, “Democracy ‘in Progress,’” Huanqiu Shibao [Global Times], 19 November 2011.
Liu Xiaobo, “Two Essays on China’s Quest for Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 22, no. 1 (January 2011): 154.
Jinghao Zhou, “Legitimacy without Democracy, Way of Transition Toward Superpower,” American Journal of Chinese Studies, 19, no. 1 (October 2012): 127.
Yang Fan, “Weiji yu fan weiji” [Crisis and Anti-Crisis], Zhanlue yu guanli [Strategies and Management], no. 3 (1998): 36–55.
Wang Shaoguang, Minzhu sijiang [Four Lectures on Democracy] (Beijing: Shenghuo Dushu Xinzhi Press, 2008).
Cui Zhiyuan, “Liberal Socialism and the Future of China: A Petty Bourgeoisie Manifesto,” in Tian Yu Cao, ed., China’s Model for Modern Development (London: Routledge, 2005), 157–74.
Ma Licheng. Dangdai zhongguo bazhong shehui sichao [Contemporary Chinese Social Thought] (Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian Publishing, 2012). 166–69.
Jiang Qing, A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012).
David Ownby, “Kang Xiaoguang: Social Science, Civil Society, and Confucian Religion,” China Perspectives, no. 4 (2009): 109.
Ai Jiawen, “Two Sides of One Coin: The Party’s Attitude Toward Confucianism in Contemporary China,” The Journal of Contemporary China, 18, no. 61 (2009): 701.
Zhuo Wenhua, “Dangdai zhongguo makesizhuyi xinyang weiji yu chongjian zhilu” [Marxism Belief Crisis and the Road of Reconstruction in Contemporary China], Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), 23, no. 3 (2011): 16–20.
Dingxin Zhao, “China’s Prolonged Stability and Political Future: Same Political System, Different Policies and Methods,” Journal of Contemporary China, 10, no. 28 (August 2001): 440.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, “Disruption without Disintegration,” Journal of Democracy, 9, no. 1 (January-March 1998): 5.
Adam Przeworski, “Some Problems in the Study of Transition to Democracy,” in Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe C. Schmitter, Laurence Whitehead, ed., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), 52.
Bruce Gilley, “The Beginning of the End,” Wall Street Journal (8 June 2008).
Sébastien Billioud, “‘Cultural Tradition’ and Official Discourses in China at the Start of the New Century,” China Perspectives, no. 3 (2007): 50–65.
Jinghan Zeng, “The Debate on Regime Legitimacy in China: Bridging the Wide Gulf between Western and Chinese Scholarship,” Journal of Contemporary China, 23, no. 88 (2014): 616.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 He Li
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, H. (2015). Debate over Legitimacy. In: Political Thought and China’s Transformation. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427816_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427816_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49123-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42781-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)