Abstract
Investing is analogous to many things. Most investors are loathe to make the comparisons, though. They want investing to sound smart. Clever. Difficult. They need for their clients to think they are incredibly well-informed and working so very hard to protect and grow their assets. The mystique also serves to create a kind of intellectual barrier to entry. The higher the better as far as the entrenched professionals are concerned. I know, I once played the game. We used phrases like “secular trend” vs. “cyclical trend” or “portfolio alpha” as opposed to the “portfolio beta.” We tossed in a standard deviation or two, a reference to the negative or perfect correlation of two investments, and if we really wanted to ratchet up the intellectual superiority (or render our clients entirely somnambulant) we talked about the bond market and the yield curve. The pièce de résistance? Convexity. We usually lost them there and felt a kernel of the smug satisfaction physicists must feel when explaining the Theory of Relativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Williams, Christopher C. (December 7, 2013) “Coach’s New Bag of Tricks.” Barron’s.
Copyright information
© 2014 Nancy Tengler
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tengler, N. (2014). A Case Study of a Stalled Luxury Brand—Coach, Inc.: Whether Coach Bags Fit Your Budget or Style, We Can Learn a Great Deal from This Former Darling. In: The Women’s Guide to Successful Investing. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403353_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403353_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40334-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40335-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)