Skip to main content

Hearing the Masses: The Modern Science of Opinion in the United States

  • Chapter
Engineering Society

Abstract

Gleaning the opinions of ordinary individuals became the object of an astonishing number of enterprises during the twentieth century: journalists hoping both to pinpoint and expand their readership, corporations to tap into and stoke consumers’ desires, state agencies and political candidates to read and influence the public mood. Focused on the rise of modern public opinion polling, this chapter tracks the creation by self-professed experts in the United States – and, somewhat later, in other Western ‘mass’ societies – of a science of opinion. It also explores the justifications for this development, and particularly the argument that empirically determining the sentiments, tastes, and will of ‘the people’ would lead to a more responsive, transparent or efficient society and body politic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • J. S. House, F. T. Juster, R. L. Kahn, H. Schuman, and E. Singer, (eds) (2004), A Telescope on Society. Survey Research and Social Science at the University of Michigan and Beyond (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. P. Seng (1951), ‘Historical Survey of the Development of Sampling Theories and Practice’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A, 114(2), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. F. Stephan (1948), ‘History of the Uses of Modern Sampling Procedures’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 43(241), pp. 12–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Desrosières (1991), ‘The Part in Relation to the Whole. How to Generalize? The Prehistory of Representative Sampling’, in M. Bulmer, K. Bales, and K. Kish Sklar (eds), The Social Survey in Historical Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press), p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gillespie (1991), Manufacturing Knowledge. A History of the Hawthorne Experiments (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Beniger (1986), The Control Revolution. Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. S. Buzzard (1990), Chains of Gold, Marketing the Ratings and Rating the Markets (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Poovey (1998), A History of the Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • C. E. Robinson Sarah E. Igo 231 (1932), Straw Votes. A Study of Political Prediction (New York: Columbia University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Asad (1994), ‘Ethnographic Representation, Statistics, and Modern Power’, Social Research 61(1), pp. 55–88

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bourdieu (1990), In Other Words. Essays Toward a Reflexive Sociology, trans. Matthew Adamson (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Robinson (1999), The Measure of Democracy. Polling, Market Research, and Public Life, 1930–1945 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gigerenzer, Z. G. Swijtink, T. M. Porter, L. Daston, J. Beatty, and L. Kruger (1989), The Empire of Chance. How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life (New York: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Porter (1995), Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star (1999), Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences (Cambridge: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Hacking (1995), ‘The Looping Effects of Human Kinds’, in D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. J. Premack (eds), Causal Cognition. A Multi-disciplinary Debate (New York: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Anderson (1991), Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised second edition (New York: Verso), pp. 163–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Converse (1964), ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent (New York: Free Press), pp. 206–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (1970), ‘The Scientization of Politics and Public Opinion’, in Toward a Rational Society (Boston, MA: Beacon Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Zaller (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 28–39

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann (1993), The Spiral of Silence. Public Opinion – Our Social Skin, second edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Frankel and L. R. Frankel (1987), ‘Fifty Years of Survey Sampling in the United States’, Public Opinion Quarterly 51(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gallup (1940), ‘Polling Public Opinion’, Current History and Forum 41 (February), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. D. Beers (2006), ‘Whose Opinion?: Changing Attitudes towards Opinion Polling in British Politics, 1937–1964’, Twentieth Century British History 17(2), pp. 177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Cowans (2002), ‘Fear and Loathing in Paris. The Reception of Opinion Polling in France, 1938–1977’, Social Science History 26(1), pp. 71–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Goot (2010), ‘“A Worse Importation than Chewing Gum”. American Influences on the Australian Press and their Limits – The Australian Gallup Poll, 1941–1973’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 30(3), pp. 269–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Hogan (1997), ‘George Gallup and the Rhetoric of Scientific Democracy’, Communication Monographs 64(2), pp. 161–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Roper (1944), ‘What People are Thinking’, New York Herald-Tribune (30 November).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Hubler (1941), ‘George Horace Gallup. Oracle in Tweed’, Forum and Century 103(2) (February), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rogers (1941), ‘Do the Gallup Polls Measure Opinion?’, Harper’s (November), p. 623.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. London (1940), ‘Ringing Doorbells with a Gallup Reporter’, New York Times Magazine (1 September), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gallup (1936), ‘Putting Public Opinion to Work’, Scribner’s Magazine (November), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. F. Goldman (1944), ‘Polls on the Polls’, Public Opinion Quarterly 8, pp. 461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Parten (1950), Surveys, Polls, and Samples. Practical Procedures (New York: Harper and Brothers), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Price (1953), ‘What Daily News Executives Think of Public Opinion Polls’, Journalism Quarterly 30, p. 287

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gallup (1949), ‘The Case for Public Opinion Polls’, New York Times Magazine (27 February), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Eisinger (2003), The Evolution of Presidential Polling (New York: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • W. P. Davison (1968), ‘Public Opinion’, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 13, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Fishkin (1995), The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Anderson and S. E. Fienberg (1999), Who Counts? The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America (New York: Russell Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Herbst (1993), Numbered Voices. How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. ix, 124, 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Sarah E. Igo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Igo, S.E. (2012). Hearing the Masses: The Modern Science of Opinion in the United States. In: Brückweh, K., Schumann, D., Wetzell, R.F., Ziemann, B. (eds) Engineering Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284501_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284501_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28450-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics