Abstract
Previous discussions of the intellectual exchanges between these two men, including those by the present writer, have relied on the few, but generous acknowledgements by the former and the disclaimer by the latter that he said anything of particular novelty or importance. To some extent this was the remark of one conscious of his own intellectual superiority: since for him, as for Ramsey, much was indeed obvious that others found difficult. Wittgenstein was attracted by this type of mind, but he did not himself possess it. He loved rather to ruminate on a subject, and Keynes had already noted how he resented it when the brisk Bloomsburyites moved on, thinking a matter had already been dealt with. What was said in his conversations with Sraffa seemed for a long time irrecoverable but we now have a much better idea of the reactions of both men from letters and very recently — 2006 — memoranda that have resurfaced. These show in particular that the conversations could be of general interest, but are not particularly philosophical. Method, not subject-matter, was the chief focus for both men and is perhaps, in their two fields, their chief legacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Brian McGuinness
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGuinness, B. (2008). What Wittgenstein Owed to Sraffa. In: Chiodi, G., Ditta, L. (eds) Sraffa or An Alternative Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375338_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375338_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28514-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37533-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)