Skip to main content

Use of the Europeanization Frame in Same-Sex Partnership Issues across Europe

  • Chapter
The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics Series ((GAP))

Abstract

This chapter explores the content and use of the Europeanization frame in policy documents on same-sex partnerships in the European Union (EU-27) and two candidate countries, Croatia and Turkey, in the period from 1995 to 2007.1 Issues related to intimate citizenship — a concept defined by Ken Plummer as a ‘new set of claims around the body, the relationship and sexuality’ (1996, p. 47) — have (re)emerged on the political agenda of European countries in the past 15 years. The debates on legal regulations of same-sex partnerships achieve the greatest resonance in this context, although other issues, such as sexuality, reproductive capacities, (new) living arrangements, (new) families, ethics of care, and questions about identities, are also involved. All of these debates are informed by the fact that certain groups within a political community, although they have the formal status of citizenship, still suffer inequality and exclusion based on an unjust distribution of not only economic, but also symbolic, social, political, and cultural rights. The resulting intimate citizenship claims therefore do not only envisage new morals, establishing themselves through tensions with traditional values, but also present a frame for a new politics of intimacy which, in turn, is reflected in a broadening of the scope of citizenship rights. The specific citizenship rights and their content are determined by each political entity, which, as Marshall (1994 [1950]) pointed out, constructs an image of its own ideal citizen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Armstrong, J., S. Strid and S. Walby (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Ireland (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009) ‘The Issue of Intentionality in Frame Theory: The Need for Reflexive Framing’, in E. Lombardo, P. Meier and M. Verloo (eds) The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality. Stretching, Bending and Policymaking (London: Routledge), pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. and M. B. Baraldi (2008) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Families and the Free Movement Directive: Implementation Guidelines (Brussels: ILGA Europe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (1999) ‘Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 4: 921–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, J. and A. Gamble (2002) ‘Conceptualizing Europeanization’, Public Policy and Administration, 17, 2: 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, T. and M. Mottier eds (1998) Politics of Sexuality (Identity, Gender, Citizenship) (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowska, M. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Poland (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombos, T., M. Jaigma and R. Kuhar (2008) Mapping Frames on Intimate Citizenship in Europe (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombos, T. et al. (2009) ‘Critical Frame Analysis: a Comparative Methodology for the QUING Project’, paper presented at the ECPR First European Conference on Politics and Gender at Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland (January, 21–23, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K. (2000) ‘EMU as Europeanization: Convergence, Diversity and Contingency’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 4: 645–66.European Value Survey (2000), http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/, data accessed 7 December 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Croatia (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harjunen, H. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Finland (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. E. (2004) ‘Developing Conceptualisations of Europeanization: Synthesising Methodological Approaches’, Queen’s Papers on Europeanization, 3 /2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2000) ‘Conclusion’, in H. Kassim, B. G. Peters and W. Wright (eds) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, R. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Slovenia (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, R. (1994) ‘Europeanization of Domestic Policies and Institutions: The Case of France’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32, 1: 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, S. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: The Netherlands (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1994 [1950]) ‘Citizenship and Social Class’, in B. Turner and P. Hamilton (eds) Citizenship: Critical Concepts (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2002) ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 5: 921–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantelidou-Maloutas, M., M. Kakepaki and A. Nikolaou (2009) Larg Comparative Report: Greece (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1996) ‘Intimate Citizenship and the Culture of Sexual Story Telling’, in J. Weeks and J. Holland (eds) Sexual Cultures (Communities, Values and Intimacy) (New York: St. Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2000) ‘Whiter Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change’, European Integration online Papers 4, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008.htm, date accessed 22 November 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štulhofer, A. and I. Rimac (2009) Determinants of Homonegativity in Europe, Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takács, J. (2004) ‘Influence of European Institutions on the Hungarian Legislation Regarding Gay and Lesbian Rights’, paper presented at the Gays’ and lesbians’ Rights in an Enlarged European Union, University of Brussels, Belgium (December, 4, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertinegg, K. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Austria (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Val, F. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Malta (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikonja, M. (2005) Eurosis: A Critique of the New Eurocentrism (Ljubljana: Peace Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2005) ‘Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe. A Critical Frame Analysis’, The Greek Review of Social Research, 117B: 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. and E. Lombardo (2007) ‘Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach’ in M. Verloo (ed.) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe (Budapest: CPS), pp. 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, R. (2009) LARG Comparative Report: Luxembourg (Vienna: IWM.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1994) ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ Sociology, 28, 2: 379–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Roman Kuhar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuhar, R. (2012). Use of the Europeanization Frame in Same-Sex Partnership Issues across Europe. In: Lombardo, E., Forest, M. (eds) The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. Gender and Politics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355378_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics