Skip to main content

Using the EU to Promote Gender Equality Policy in a Traditional Context: Reconciliation of Work and Family Life in Italy

  • Chapter
The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics Series ((GAP))

Abstract

Policies aiming to reconcile paid employment with family responsibilities have become highly relevant in all European countries since the beginning of the new millennium (Lewis et al., 2008; Abrahamson, 2007). This is more evident in the case of the EU member states, as during the 1990s the European Commission promoted significant policy initiatives in a context where ‘women with children (under 12 years age) work less (–11.5 per cent in the employment rate) than women without children, while men with children work more than men without children (+6.8 points)’ (European Commission, 2009, p. 5). Today, reconciliation policies for parents are a cornerstone of the welfare state’s reform. These policies pursue a dual objective: the growth of female employment and an increase in fertility rates. Both are to remedy situations experienced by the majority of the industrially advanced European societies, and to battle the negative repercussions on the sustainability of the traditional welfare state (Bonoli, 2005). In 2000, the issue of reconciliation also received attention in Italy, leading to the introduction of a specific law. Yet, up to now the outcomes of the law are not very significant, given that the Italian rate of female employment (46.4 per cent in 2009) remains amongst the lowest in Europe, together with Malta (Eurostat, 2009). What can explain the Italian difficulties in promoting female employment by helping parents reconcile work and family life?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abrahamson, P. (2007) ‘Reconciliation of Work and Family Life in Europe’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9, 2: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbagli, M., M. Castiglioni, and G. Dalla Zanna (2003) Fare Famiglia in Italia (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2009) ‘Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 5: 701–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimbi, F. (2003) ‘The Family Paradigm in the Italian Welfare State’, in M. J. Gonzales, T. Jurado and M. Naldini (eds) Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe: Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s (London: Frank Cass), pp. 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2005) ‘The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage Against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States’, Policy & Politics, 33, 3: 431–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T. and T. Risse (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe’, in K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds) The Politics of Europeanization (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 57–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camere di Commercio (2008) ‘Impresa in Genere 2003–2007’, http://www.unioncamere.gov.it (home page), date accessed 5 November 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk, L. and A. van Doorne Huiskes (2007) ‘Social Policy in Europe: Its Impact on Families and Work’, in R. Crompton, S. Lewis and C. Lyonette (eds) Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donà, A. (2009) ‘From Pacs to Didore: Why Are Civil Partnerships Such a Divisive Issue in Italian Politics?’, Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1, 2: 333–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) ‘Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010–2015’, COM(2010) 491 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) ‘Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Equality between Men and Women-2010’, COM(2009)694 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) ‘Implementation of the Barcelona Objectives Concerning Childcare Facilities for pre-School-Age Children’, COM(2008) 638 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1989) ‘Communication from the Commission on Family Policies’, COM (89) 363 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2010) Europe in Figures: Eurostat Yearbook 2010 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2009) Employment Rate by Gender, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/, date accessed 7 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2006) ‘How Is the Time of Women and Men Distributed in Europe?’ Statistics in Focus, 4 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2006) ‘The Italian Case of a Transition within Democracy’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 8, 2: 145–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G., and O. Treib (2008) ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 2: 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996) ‘The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1: 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grecchi, A. (1995) Pari Opportunità: Il Diritto e la Cultura (Milan: Franco Angeli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Cowles, M., J. Caporaso, and T. Risse eds (2001) Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnini, M. and A. Donà (2007) ‘Women’s Policy Machinery in Italy between European Pressures and Domestic Constraint’, in J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola (eds) Changing State Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 165–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskyns C. (1996) Integrating Gender (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isfol (2007) Maternità, Lavoro, Discriminazioni (Rome: Isfol).

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2008) Conciliare Lavoro e Famiglia: Una Sfida Quotidiana (Rome: Istat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2004) Come Cambia la Vita delle Donne (Rome: Istat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2006) ‘Work/Family Reconciliation, Equal Opportunities and Social Policies: The Interpretation of Policy Trajectories at the EU level and the Meaning of Equality’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 3: 420–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., T. Knijn, C. Martin, and I. Ostner (2008) ‘Patterns of Development in Work/Family Reconciliation Policies for Parents in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15, 3: 261–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. and M. Sangiuliano (2009) ‘Gender and Employment in Italian Policy Debates: The Construction of “Non-employed” Gendered Subjects’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 32, 6: 445–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride Stetson D. and A. Mazur, eds (1995) Comparative State Feminism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Natoli, G. (2005) ‘Risvegli. La Domanda Aziendale di Conciliazione tra Lavoro e Famiglia’, in L. Battistoni (ed.) I Numeri delle Donne (Rome: Quaderni Spinn, 17), pp. 134–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, J. and J. Kantola, eds (2007) Changing State Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2004) ‘Europeanization: Solution or Problem?’ European Integration online Papers, 8, 16, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-016.pdf, date accessed 18 November 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva, E. (2010) ‘Le Politiche di Conciliazione. Un Sistema a Rischio’, Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali, 1: 111–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (2003) Mutamenti della Famiglia e Politica Sociale in Italia (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2010) ‘Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism” ’, European Political Science Review, 2, 1: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. and C. Radaelli (2004) ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues’, West European Politics, 27, 22: 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2002) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (New York: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. and G. Falkner (2006) ‘The EU and New Social Risks: The Need for a Differentiated Evaluation’, in K. Armingeon and G. Bonoli (eds) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks (London: Routledge), pp. 248–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der V Leuten, A. (2007) The Price of Gender Equality (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woll, C. and S. Jacquot (2010) ‘Using Europe. Strategic Action in Multi-Level Politics’, Comparative European Politics, 8, 1: 110–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanatta, A. L. (2003) Le Nuove Famiglie (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Alessia Donà

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donà, A. (2012). Using the EU to Promote Gender Equality Policy in a Traditional Context: Reconciliation of Work and Family Life in Italy. In: Lombardo, E., Forest, M. (eds) The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. Gender and Politics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355378_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics