Skip to main content

Bruce Andrews’ Lip Service and the Character of True Reading

  • Chapter
Reading as Belief
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

“Bruce Andrews is not a poet,” a professor to whom I had shown Andrews’ Getting Ready To Have Been Frightened as an undergraduate told me. (I can’t remember what he said Andrews was, but it wasn’t complimentary.) I am not entirely sure Andrews would disagree with the characterization, although he might point out that nobody else is a poet either, at least not in the sense my professor meant the word. Andrews likens his role as an author to that of an editor: he weaves together slices of political speech, overheard conversation, pop culture, and literature, and in the process examines how intellectual, cultural, and literary production occurs through shifting social relationships, not from the minds of isolated individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bruce Andrews, “Paradise & Method: A Transcript,” in Paradise & Method: poetics & praxis (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1996), 253.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan Edwards, “A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections,” in A Jonathan Edwards Reader, ed. John E. Smith, Harry S. Stout, Kenneth P. Minkema (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce Andrews, Lip Service (Toronto: Coach House Books, 2001), 194.

    Google Scholar 

  4. William Wordsworth, The Prelude: Or Growth of a Poet’s Mind (text of 1805), ed. Ernest De Selincourt (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970), 1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leo Bersani, “Is the Rectum a Grave?,” in AIDS: cultural analysis/cultural activism, ed. Douglas Crimp (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988), 217.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations is the backdrop that illuminates Lip Service’s forceful language use. Recalling Wittgenstein’s “beetle in a box” illustration reminds us that meaning does not depend on individual experience (like having a beetle in a box), but on having words that enter their users into a public sphere. Wittgenstein writes, now someone tells me that he knows what pain is only from his own case!— Suppose everyone had a box with something in it: we call it a “beetle.” No one can look into anyone else’s box, and everyone says he knows what a beetle is only by looking at his beetle—Here it would be quite possible for everyone to have something different in his box. One might even imagine such a thing constantly changing—But suppose the word “beetle” has a use in these people’s language?—If so it would not be used as the name of a thing. The thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something: for the box might be empty. (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 2nd ed. rept. trans. G.E.M. Anscombe [Oxford: Blackwell, 1958], 100.)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terrence Deacon, The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain (New York: WW. Norton 1997), 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Joel Bettridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bettridge, J. (2009). Bruce Andrews’ Lip Service and the Character of True Reading. In: Reading as Belief. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101265_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics