Skip to main content

Geopolitics in the Post–Arab Spring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Europe as a Stronger Global Actor

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

  • 875 Accesses

Abstract

The Arab Spring quickly turned into winters of discontent. Although the events that led up to and followed the Arab Spring cannot be laid directly at the EU’s doorstep, they nevertheless exposed the underpinning dualism behind the EU’s policies towards the region. Prior to the Arab Spring, the EU and its members had engaged in trade with the southern Mediterranean with relatively little comment on the autocratic nature of the regimes, in return for retaining order in the countries and stemming potential migratory flows. Not only did this informal compact unravel in 2011, it also marked a fundamental challenge to the EU in a region where it was supposed to be able to exert considerable attraction. The rise of Islamic State and other forms of Salafist jihadism pose fundamental challenges to stability in the region and beyond. The EU’s ability to help provide stability to the region in association with the Member States and other international partners will require a keener sense of the EU’s strategic interests and stakes. It will also be a litmus test for the Union’s pretentions to be a major actor shaping the international system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amnesty International. 2016. Dutch Plan for EU “Refugee Swap” with Turkey is Morally Bankrupt, 28 January, available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/01/dutch-plan-for-eu-refugee-swap-with-turkey-is-morally-bankrupt/

  • Blockmans, S. 2015. The EU and Its Neighbours: Predictions for 2015. CEPS Commentary, 5 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU 2015a. Council Conclusions on the EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as ISIL/Da’esh Threat, 7267/15, Brussels, 16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Presidency. 2014. Council Presidency to the Permanent Representatives Committee/Council, EC Follow-up Thematic Debate on Strategic Agenda Priorities: The Union as a Strong Global Actor, CO EUR-PREP 46, Brussels, 9 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, S., F. Godemont, R. Gowan, D. Levy, K. Liik, J. Shapiro, and N. Witney. 2015. The Road Back to European Power, Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2011. A New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood A Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Joint Communication by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission, Brussels, 25 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Joint Consultation Paper: Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy, European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, JOIN(2015)6 final, Brussels, 4 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, JOIN(2015) 50 final, Brussels, 18 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015c. EU, Trade in Goods with MEDA (Excluding EU), Directorate-General for Trade, 20 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. 2016. Statement of the EU Heads of State or Government, Brussels, 7 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Security Strategy. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2015. Freedom in the World 2015 (Freedom House), available at https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/01152015_FIW_2015_final.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, H. 2014. It’s Time for Brussels to Re-thing Its Post-Arab Spring Strategy, Europe’s World, Summer, 15 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.D. 2012. The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehne, S. 2014. Time to Reset the European Neighbourhood Policy, February. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. 2012. Introduction: Europe and the Challenge of the Arab Spring. In The EU and the Arab Spring: Promoting Democracy and Human Rights in the Middle East, ed. J. Peters. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simón, L. 2015. Europe, the Rise of Asia and the Future Transatlantic Relationship. International Affairs 91(5): 969–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Duke .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duke, S. (2017). Geopolitics in the Post–Arab Spring. In: Europe as a Stronger Global Actor . European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics