Abstract
The EU has been generally content to view itself, and to let others view it, as a normative power. But, it has always had difficulty defining its interests. In response to this the EU and its members have normally contented themselves with the explanation that values are synonymous with interests and vice versa. This is, however, insufficient, especially in an international system where illiberal powers offer alternative ways of engaging states and organizations. The insistence on the EU’s normative character also exposed the creeping moral relativism in the Union’s external actions. A second, often uncontested, element of the EU’s external engagement lies in effective multilateralism and the rule of law. However, this too showed evidence of relativism in terms of the over-representation of the EU’s members in many international organizations and hazy conceptions of how international law should guide external actions in an increasingly contested and illiberal international system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashton, C. 2011. Human Rights and Democracy at the Heart of EU External Action—Towards a More Effective Approach. Speech to the European Parliament, 13 December, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/2012/060112_hr_silverthread_en.htm
——— 2014. Address by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton at the UN Security Council on the Cooperation between the EU and the UN on International Peace and Security, 140214/02, New York, 14 February.
Council of the EU. 2001. EU Guidelines on Human Rights Dialogues with Third Countries, 25 June.
Council of the EU. 2011. General Secretariat of the Council to Delegations, EU Statements in Multilateral Organisations: General Arrangements, 15901/11, Brussels, 24 October.
——— 2012. EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy, Luxembourg, 25 June, 11855/12.
Council Presidency. 2014. Council Presidency to the Permanent Representatives Committee/Council, EC Follow-up Thematic Debate on Strategic Agenda Priorities: The Union as a Strong Global Actor, CO EUR-PREP 46, Brussels, 9 December.
EEAS. 2015. The EU in a Changing Global Environment: A More Connected, Contested and Complex World, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/docs/strategic_review/eu-strategic-review_strategic_review_en.pdf
ESPAS. 2014. Global Trends to 2030: Can the EU Meet the Challenges Ahead?, European Strategy and Policy Analysis System.
European Commission. 2011. A New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood A Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Joint Communication by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission, Brussels, 25 May.
———. 2015a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Agenda on Security, COM (2015) 185 final, Strasbourg, 28 April.
———. 2015b. EU, Trade in Goods with MEDA (Excluding EU), Directorate-General for Trade, 20 October.
European Parliament. 2014. New EU Security Strategy Must Tackle Emerging Threats. Press Release, Justice and Home Affairs, 17 December, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20141212IPR01246/html/New-EU-Security-Strategy-must-tackle-emerging-threats-MEPs-say
European Security Strategy. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December.
Grevi, G. 2009. The Interpolar World: A New Scenario, Occasional Paper 79. Paris: European Institute of Security Studies, June.
Grevi, G., and A. Vasconcelos, eds. 2008. Partnerships for Effective Multilateralism: EU Relations with Brazil, China, India and Russia, Chaillot Paper, No. 109, May.
Krauthammer, C.1990. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs 70(1): 23–33.
Kupchan, C.2012. No One’s World: The West, The Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manners, I.2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.
Missiroli, A. 2014. On Juncker’s List: Improving EU External Action, Issue Alert, EU Institute for Security Studies, July.
Mogherini, F. 2014a. Opening Statement by Federica Mogherini, Vice-President Designate of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, at the hearing in the European Parliament, 141007/03, Brussels, 7 October.
Mogherini, F. 2014b. Declaration by the High Representative Federica Mogherini on Behalf of the EU on Human Rights Day, Presse 640, Brussels, 10 December
——— 2015a. Remarks by the High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the EU-ISS Annual Conference, Brussels, 151009-96, 9 October.
——— 2015b. EU Statement by High Representative/Vice-President Mogherini at the United Nations Security Council: Cooperation between the UN and Regional and Sub-Reginal Organizations, 9 March.
Pech, L. 2012. Rule of Law as a Guiding Principle of the EU’s External Action, CLEER Working Papers, No. 3. Den Haag: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations.
Piris, J.-C.2010. The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. 2013. Beyond the Comfort Zone: Internal Crisis and External Challenge in the EU’s Response to Rising Powers. International Affairs 89(3): 653–671.
Tocci, N. 2015. Towards an EU Global Strategy. In Towards an EU Global Strategy: Background, Process, References, ed. A. Missiroli. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Wouters, J., J. Odermatt, and T. Ramopoulos. 2011. The Status of the EU at the United Nations after the General Assembly Resolution of 3 May 2011, Global Governance Opinions, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, July.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duke, S. (2017). In Search of Strategy. In: Europe as a Stronger Global Actor . European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94944-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94945-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)