Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter provides a broad contextualisation of the Handbook, locating its focus within current debates and concerns of relevance to the field of applied linguistics. The editors highlight the field’s growing interest in research methodology and offer a rationale for the selection of topics and issues in the Handbook, such as methodological reform, transparency, transdisciplinarity, and the impact of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, J. D. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2015). Why bother learning advanced quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 9–20). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Rogers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, H. (2011). Perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 95, 628–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. Modern Language Journal, 97, 825–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. (2015). Birds out of dinosaurs: The death and life of applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 36, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunnings, I., & Finlayson, I. (2015). Mixed effects modelling and longitudinal data analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., & Elder, C. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of applied linguistics. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bot, K. (2015). A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2016). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I., Rawal, H., & Zaykovskaya, I. (2017). Study abroad in contemporary times: Toward greater methodological diversity and innovation. Special issue of System, 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. (2009). A historical survey of SLA research. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3–27). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. J., Smith, P. H., & Wicaksono, R. (2011). Mapping applied linguistics: A guide for students and practitioners. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical sociolinguistic research methods: Studying language issues that matter. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, A. (2016). Doing and writing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivankova, N. V., & Greer, J. L. (2015). Mixed methods research and analysis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 63–81). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (Ed.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. A., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. Modern Language Journal, 100, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linck, J., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboob, A., & Knight, N. K. (Eds.). (2010). Appliable linguistics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., … De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). Breadth and depth: The IRIS repository. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E. J., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (in press). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews, and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68(2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (in press). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2017). Doing research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas and solutions. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, A. J., Creswell, J. W., & Saville, N. (Eds.). (2015). Language assessment and mixed methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (in press). The Bayesian revolution in L2 research: An applied approach. Language Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., Plonsky, L., Ross, S. J., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Guidelines for reporting quantitative methods and results in primary research. Language Learning, 65, 470–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity and language education. Language Teaching, 51, 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2015). Research synthesis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 225–244). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds.). (2010). Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2015a). Developing a research project. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 260–278). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds.). (2015b). Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M., & Aronin, L. (2014). Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism: Studies in honor of David Singleton. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, F. L. (2012). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phakiti, A., & Paltridge, B. (2015). Approaches and methods in applied linguistics research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 5–25). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98, 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., Egbert, J., & LaFlair, G. T. (2015). Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics, 36, 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L, & Ghanbar, H. (in press). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of R2 values. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 106–128). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies: An advanced resource book for students. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (Ed.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfield, S. (2015). Ethnographic research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 137–152). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, J., Shao, G., & Gao, X. (2017). Ethics-related practices in internet-based applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics Review, 8, 321–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, N. (2016). Methodological practices in interaction in synchronous computer mediated communication: A synthetic approach. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Instruments for research into second languages: Empirical studies advancing methodology (pp. 197–223). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aek Phakiti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (2018). Applied Linguistics Research: Current Issues, Methods, and Trends. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics