Skip to main content

Analytical Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourse Analysis as Social Critique

Part of the book series: Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse ((PSDS))

  • 1212 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It could easily be argued that the origin of radical individualism lies not in Nietzsche but in the young Hegelian Max Stirner (see Sect. 1.2, p. 16).

  2. 2.

    On that example, see also Herzog (2009, 2016b).

  3. 3.

    In a similar manner, Ruiz Ruiz (2014) speaks of “hidden or silenced discourses” (p. 180).

  4. 4.

    As I point out in the cited works, I do not understand the pair inclusion/exclusion as binary and univocal but instead as gradual displacements.

  5. 5.

    Of course, this is a gross simplification of a complex historic process. In a real analysis of these processes, other structural discursive and non-discursive factors would have to be taken into account.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1970) Negative Dialektik. Jargon der Eigentlichkeit, (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermuller, J. (2007) Nach dem Strukturalismus. Theoriediskurs und intellektuelles Feld in Frankreich, (Bielefeld: Transcript).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angermuller, J. (2014) Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in Enunciative Pragmatics, (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1967) The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2011) On Critique – A Sociology of Emancipation, (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, C (2008) ‘The End of Immanent Critique?’, European Journal of Social Theory 11(1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bührmann, A. & Schneider, W. (2007) ‘More Than Just a Discursive Practice? Conceptual Principles and Methodological Aspects of Dispositif Analysis’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührmann, A. & Schneider, W. (2008) Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv - Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse, (Bielefeld: transcript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1990) ‘Positioning: The discursive production of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20: 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2011) Why Marx was right, (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change, (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2004) ‘Critical discourse analysis in researching language in the new capitalism: Overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis’, in: Harison, C. & Young, L. (eds.) Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis, (London: Continuum), pp. 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1975) Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction, (London: Allen Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981) ‘The order of discourse’, in: R. Young (ed.) Untying the text: A post-structural anthology, (Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 48–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002) The Archaeology of Knowledge, (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007) The politics of truth, (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2011) Debt: The First 5000 Years, (New York: Melville House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2015) The utopia of rules. On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy, (London: Melville House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, E. (2007) ‘Reading Affect—On the Heterotopian Spaces of Care and Domestic Work in Private Households’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702118.

  • Hernàndez, F. & Herzog, B. (2011b) ‘Expropriierte Identitäten. Diskursive Exklusionsmechanismen und deren Wirkungsweisen’, Contribution at the conference Neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, Innsbruck, October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2009) Exclusión discursiva – el imaginario social sobre inmigración y drogas, (Valencia: PUV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B.(2011) ‘Exclusión Discursiva - hacia un nuevo concepto de la exclusión social’, Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69(3): 607–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2013b) ‘Ausschluss im (?) Diskurs. Diskursive Exklusion und die neuere soziologische Diskursforschung’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1302199.

  • Herzog, B. (2014) ‘Was bedeutet immanente Kritik für die empirische Sozialforschung? Überlegungen zur Erschlieβung notwendiger Widersprüche‘, in: Romero, J. M. (ed.) Immanente Kritik heute, (Bielefeld: transcript), pp. 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B. (2016b) O'Reilly & Jessica Lester (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health, (Houndmills: Palgrave), pp. 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, B., Gómez-Guardeño, E., Agulló-Calatayud, V., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2008) ‘Discourses on Drugs and Immigration: The Social Construction of a Problem’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1) http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090172.

  • Herzog, B. & Hernàndez, F. (2012) ‘La noción de «lucha» en la teoría de reconocimiento de Axel Honneth. Sobre la posibilidad de subsanar el «déficit sociológico» de la Teoría Crítica con la ayuda del Análisis del Discurso’, Política & Sociedad, 49(3): 609–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1992) Der Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp). [English: Honneth, A (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, (Cambridge: Polity Press).]

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2004) ‘Anerkennung als Ideologie’, WestEnd Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 1: 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2011a) Das Recht der Freiheit, (Berlin: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2013) ‘Theorie der Anerkennung als kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft? – Ein Interview mit Axel Honneth’, Soziologiemagazin http://soziologieblog.hypotheses.org/4000.

  • Hook, D. (2001) ‘Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history - Foucault and discourse analysis’, Theory & Psychology, 11(4): 521–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, R. (2014a) Kritik von Lebensformen, (Berlin: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, R. (2014b) ‘Was (wenn überhaupt etwas) ist falsch am Kapitalismus? Drei Wege der Kapitalismuskritik’, in: Jaeggi, R. & Loick, D. (eds.) Nach Marx – Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis, (Berlin: Suhrkamp), pp. 321–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2005a) ‘Analysing Discourse. An Approach From the Sociology of Knowledge’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2005b) Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse – Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogrammes, (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R., Hirseland, A., Schneider, W. & Viehöver, W. (Eds.) (2005) Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit: Zum Verhältnis von Wissenssoziologie und Diskursforschung, (Konstanz: UVK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (2014) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, J. (1986) ‘Noch einmal: Diskurs. Interdiskurs. Macht’, kultuRRevolution, 11(4): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk, K. (1984) Ideologie. Ideologiekritik und Wissenssoziologie, (Frankfurt a.M.: Luchterhand).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz, J. (2005) ‘Order at all Points. Lassen sich Diskursanalyse und Hermeneutik gewinnbringend miteinander verbinden?’, in: Keller, R., Hirseland, A., Schneider, W. & Viehöver, W. (eds.) Die discursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit, (Konstanz: UVK), pp. 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinarman, C. & Levine, H. G. (2004) ‘Crack in the Rearview Mirror: Deconstructing Drug War Mythology’, Social Justice, 31(1/2): 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renout, G. (2012) Wissen in Arbeit und in Bewegung? Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse aktueller Strategien von LebenskünstlerInnen in Kreativarbeit und zeitgenössischem Tanz, (Wiesbaden: VS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Ruiz, J. (2009) ‘Análisis sociológico del discurso: Métodos y lógicas’ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Ruiz, J. (2014) ‘El discurso implícito: aportaciones para un análisis sociológico’, REIS - Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 146: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar, M. (2009) ‘Macht und Kritik’, in: Forst, R., Hartmann, M., Jaeggi, R. & Saar, M. (eds.) Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 567–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerwald, G. (2008) Reconocimiento y Liberación: Axel Honneth y el pensamiento latinoamericano. Por un diálogo entre el Sur y el Norte, (Berlin: Lit Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1967) Phenomenology of the social world, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, T (2013b) Immanente Kritik. Elemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken, (Frankfurt M./New York: Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, B. D. (1999) “Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?” And Other Conversations About Race, (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994) Multiculturalism – Examining the politics of recognition, (Princeton: University Press), pp. 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse & Society, 4: 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1995) ‘Discourse, Power and Access’, in: M. Coulthard & Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis, (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society – An outline of interpretive sociology, (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of discourse, (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (ed.) (2012) Mapping Ideology, (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J. A. (2011) ‘Lässt sich der Kapitalismus immanent kritisieren? Reflexionen mit und über Theodor W. Adorno’, Contribution at the international seminar: Immanente Kritik. Grundlagen und Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Begriffs, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herzog, B. (2016). Analytical Tools. In: Discourse Analysis as Social Critique. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56908-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56908-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56907-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56908-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics