Skip to main content

Leisure and “The Civilising Process”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Leisure Theory

Abstract

This chapter examines the German sociologist Norbert Elias’ theory of “The Civilising Process” in relation to leisure. It sets out the main tenets of this theory and its implications for thinking sociologically about leisure (and sport). It discusses the international debate among scholars over “football hooliganism” that took place in the late 1980s and 1990s in which Eliasan theorists (self-styled “figurationists”) played a leading role. It also examines the key Eliasan proposition that leisure in modern societies, since these societies are inherently “unexciting”, entails a necessary quest for excitement. This chapter suggests that discussion of these questions did less to enhance understanding of these matters than it might have. This chapter closes with a brief consideration of the main criticisms that have been levelled at Eliasan sociologists and their understanding of leisure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term was coined by the Cambridge historian Sir Herbert Butterfield (Butterfield 1973).

  2. 2.

    Adrian Franklin has suggested that the theory fits angling better than fox hunting—see Franklin (1996).

  3. 3.

    One writer even suggested that, in adopting the notion of incorporation, the “Leicester School” had abandoned the “civilising process” altogether—see Best (2010).

  4. 4.

    Presidential address to the British Society for the Advancement of Science, September, 1916: <http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Extras/BA_1916_1.html> Accessed 2 Nov 2015.

References

  • Attwood, F. (Ed.). (2010). porn.com : Making sense of online pornography. Oxford: Peter Lang.

  • Best, S. (2010). The Leicester school of football hooliganism: An evaluation. Soccer and Society, 11(5), 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. (1973). The Whig interpretation of history. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1999). Social theory: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. (1994). Ha, Bloody Ha: Comedians talking. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daisey, M. (2015, August 22). Amazon’s brutal work culture will stay: Bottom lines matter more than people. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/22/amazon-brutal-work-culture. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.

  • Dredge, S. (2014, December 31). Study claims more than 80% of ‘dark net’ traffic is to child abuse sites. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/31/dark-web-traffic-child-abuse-sites. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.

  • Dunning, E. (1989). The figurational approach to leisure and sport. In C. Rojek (Ed.), Leisure for leisure: Critical essays (pp. 36–52). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E. (1994). The social roots of football hooliganism: A reply to the critics of the “Leicester school”. In R. Giulianotti, N. Bonney, & M. Hepworth (Eds.), Football, violence and social identity (pp. 128–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E. (2008). Notes on the text. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. ix–xvi). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., & Hughes, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and modern sociology: Knowledge, interdependence, power, process. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., & Rojek, C. (Eds.). (1992). Sport and leisure in the civilising process: Critique and counter-critique. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., & Sheard, K. (1979). Barbarians, gentlemen and players: A sociological study if the development of Rugby football. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1988). The roots of football hooliganism: An historical and sociological study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1956). Problems of involvement and detachment. The British Journal of Sociology, 7(3), 226–252. See also unige.ch/sciences-societe/socio/files/9014/0533/6294/Elias_1956.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2015.

  • Elias, N. (1969). The civilizing process volume 1: The history of manners. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1982). The civilizing process volume II: State formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1986). An essay on sport and violence. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. 150–173). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2000). The civilising process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (1971). Folk football in mediaeval and early modern Britain. In E. Dunning (Ed.), The sociology of sport: A selection of readings (pp. 116–132). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (2008). The quest for excitement in leisure. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. 44–72). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1988). Review of quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process by Norbert Elias and Eric Dunning. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1520–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. (1996). On fox-hunting and angling: Norbert Elias and the “sportisation” process. Journal of Historical Sociology, 9(4), 432–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1991). On metapsychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (Eds. and Trans.). (1967). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulianotti, R. (2004). Civilizing games: Norbert Elias and the sociology of sport. In R. Giulianotti (Ed.), Sport and modern social theorists (pp. 145–160). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorn, E. J. (1985). “Gouge and bite, pull hair and scratch”: The social significance of fighting in the southern backcountry. The American Historical Review, 90(1), 18–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halnon, K. B. (2006). Heavy metal carnival and dis-alienation: The politics of grotesque realism. Symbolic Interaction, 29(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2003). Learning to smoke: Tobacco use in the West. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, K. (2011). Sport and leisure. In N. Gabriel & S. Mennell (Eds.), Norbert Elias and figurational research: Processual thinking in sociology (pp. 160–180). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (1990). Decivilising processes: Theoretical significance and some lines of research. International Sociology, 5(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (1992). Permission and regulation: Law and morals in post-war Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsinger, J. (2015, November). The privatization of military power. Socialist Review, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriard, M. (2011). Rough manly sport and the American way: Theodore Roosevelt and college football, 1905. In S. Wagg (Ed.), Myths and milestones in the history of sport (pp. 80–105). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1971). The future of work and leisure. London: MacGibbon and Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, C. (1986). Problems of involvement and detachment in the writings of Norbert Elias. British Journal of Sociology, 37(4), 584–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1980). Sociology of leisure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (1992). Cleaning up the game: Perspectives on the evolution of professional sports. In E. Dunning & C. Rojek (Eds.), Sport and leisure in the civilising process: Critique and counter-critique (pp. 65–95). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (1977). Informalisation and the civilising process. In P. R. Gleichmann et al. (Eds.), Human figurations: Essays for Norbert Elias (pp. 437–456). Amsterdam: Stichting Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift [Amsterdam Sociological Review].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Peter Bramham and Spencer Swain for commenting on, and helping to improve, the earlier drafts of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagg, S. (2017). Leisure and “The Civilising Process”. In: Spracklen, K., Lashua, B., Sharpe, E., Swain, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leisure Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56478-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56479-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics