Skip to main content
Log in

A Law of Large Numbers: Bidding and Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Refuse Collection Contracts

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the relationship betweencosts and number of bidders for U.K. local authorities'refuse collection contracts. We find that a highernumber of bids is associated with a lower cost ofservice. This finding, as well as being an importantempirical verification of standard proposition inauction theory, has important policy implications. TheU.K. Labour government elected in 1997 has abolishedCompulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT). Our findingsindicate that this would increase local authorities'expenditure in refuse collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brannman, L., D. Klein, and L. Weiss (1987) ‘The Price Effects of Increased Competition in Auction Markets’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRMB (1995) CCT: The Private Sector View. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC Research (1996) Contracts Handbook. CDC Publishing Limited.

  • Cubbin, J., S. Domberger, and S. Meadowcroft (1987) ‘Competitive Tendering and Refuse Collection: Identifying the Source of Efficiency Gains’, Fiscal Studies, 8(3), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domberger, S., S. Meadowcroft, and D. Thompson (1986) ‘Competitive Tendering and Efficiency: The Case of Refuse Collection’, Fiscal Studies, 7(4), 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elyakime, B., J. J. Laffont, P. Loisel, and Q. Vuong (1994) ‘First-Price Sealed Bid Auctions with Secret Reservation Prices’, Annales D'Économie et de Statistique, 34, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giliberto, M., and N. Varaiya (1989) ‘The Winner's Curse and Bidder Competition in Acquisitions: Evidence from Failed Bank Auctions’, The Journal of Finance, 44, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, O., and G. Karels (1981) ‘The Competitive Effect in Bonus Bidding: New Evidence’, Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks and Paarsch (1995) ‘A Survey of Recent EmpiricalWork Concerning Auctions’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 28, 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.J. (1997) ‘Game Theory and Empirical Economics: The Case of Auction Data’, European Economic Review, 41, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, P., and J. McMillan (1987) ‘Auctions and Bidding’, Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 699–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1979) ‘A Convergence Theorem for Competitive Bidding with Differential Information’, Econometrica, 50, 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1989) ‘Auctions and Bidding: A Primer’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(3), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and R. Weber (1982) A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, Econometrica, 50, 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J., and W. Samuelson (1981) ‘Optimal Auctions’, American Economic Review, 71, 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, S. (1996) ‘The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on Refuse Collection Services’, Fiscal Studies, 17(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1977) ‘A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition’, Review of Economic Studies, 44, 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GóMez-Lobo, A., Szymanski, S. A Law of Large Numbers: Bidding and Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Refuse Collection Contracts. Review of Industrial Organization 18, 105–113 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026545306923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026545306923

Navigation