Skip to main content
Log in

Timing of Prophylactic Surgery in Prevention of Diverticulitis Recurrence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although surgery is recommended after two or more attacks of uncomplicated diverticulitis, the optimal timing for surgery in terms of cost-effectiveness is unknown. A Markov model was used to compare the costs and outcomes of performing surgery after one, two, or three uncomplicated attacks in 60-year-old hypothetical cohorts. Transition state probabilities were assigned values using published data and expert opinion. Costs were estimated from Medicare reimbursement rates. Surgery after the third attack is cost saving, yielding more years of life and quality adjusted life years at a lower cost than the other two strategies. The results were not sensitive to many of the variables tested in the model or to changes made in the discount rate (0–5%). In conclusion, performing prophylactic resection after the third attack of diverticulitis is cost saving in comparison to resection performed after the first or second attacks and remains cost-effective during sensitivity analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lorimer JW: Is prophylactic resection valid as an indication for elective surgery in diverticular disease? Can J Surg 40:445–448, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrosetti P, Robert JH, Witzig JA, Mirescu D, Borst F, Rohner A: Acute left colonic diverticulitis: A prospective analysis of 226 consecutive cases. Surgery 115:546–550, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis-supporting documentation. Dis Colon Rectum 38:126–132, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: SSAT patient care guidelines 2000. Surgical treatment of diverticulitis. Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Boston, Massachusetts.

  5. Hackford AW, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC: Surgical management of complicated diverticulitis. The Lahey clinic experience, 1967 to 1982. Dis Colon Rectum 28:317–321, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH: Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:71–5, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J: Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 84:380–383, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP: Surgical management of diverticulitis. The role of the Hartmann procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 26:429–432, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moreaux J, Vons C: Elective resection for diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Br J Surg 77:1036–1038, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott TB, Yego S, Irvin TT: Five-year audit of the acute complications of diverticular disease. Br J Surg 84:535–539, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parks TG: Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. A review of 521 cases. BMJ 4:639–645, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hinchey EF, Schaal PGH, Richards GK: Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khan AL, Ah-See AK, Crofts TC, Heys SD, Eremin O: Surgical management of the septic complications of diverticular disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:16–20, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belmonte C, Klas JV, Peréz JJ, Wong D, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, et al: The Hartmann procedure. First choice or last resort in diverticular disease? Arch Surg 131:612–617, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Center for Health Statistics: Vital Statistics of the United States, 1988, volume II, mortality, part A. Washington DC, Public Health Service, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  16. Almy TP, Howell DA: Diverticular disease of the colon. New Engl J Med 30:324–331, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simonowitz D, Paloyan D: Diverticular disease of the colon in patients under 40 years of age. Am J Gastroenterol 67:69–72, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson ND, Driver CP, Davidson AI, Keenan RA: Diverticular disease in patients under 50 years of age. J R Coll Surg Edinb 42:102–104, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chappuis CW, Cohn I: Acute colonic diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 68:301–313, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cardinale V (ed.) 1997 Drug Topics Red Book, 101st ed. Montvale, New Jersey Medical Economics Data, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergamaschi R, Tuetch JJ, Pessauz P, Arnaud JP: Intracorporeal vs. laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 14:520–523, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R: Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcomes and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnenberg A, Townsend WF: Costs of duodenal ulcer therapy with antibiotics. Arch Intern Med 155:922–928, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds.). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, 1st ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krukowski ZH, Koruth NM, Matheson NA: Evolving practice in acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg 72:684–686, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hachigian MP, Honickman S, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP: Computed tomography in the initial management of acute left-sided diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 35:1123–1129, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haglund U, Hellberg R, Johnsèn C, Hultèn L: Complicated diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. An analysis of short and longterm outcome in 392 patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol 68:41–46, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tudor RG, Farmakis N, Keighley MRB: National audit of complicated diverticular disease: analysis of index cases. Br J Surg 81:730–732, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  29. Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA: Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: A review. Br J Surg 71:921–927, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ: Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg 79:839–841, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE, Spalding EM, Rainey JB: Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann's procedure: The Lothian experience 1987–1992. Br J Surg 82:27–30, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nylamo E: Diverticulitis of the colon: Role of surgery in preventing complications. Ann Chir Gynaecol 79:139–142, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW: Schroeder TK: Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surgery 222:120–127, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  34. Farmakis N, Tudor RG, Keighley MRB: The 5-year natural history of complicated diverticular disease. Br J Surg 81:733–735, 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, R.J., Hammitt, J.K. Timing of Prophylactic Surgery in Prevention of Diverticulitis Recurrence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 47, 1903–1908 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019624101225

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019624101225

Navigation