Abstract
Hydraulic lift was investigated in a greenhouse study involving two drought-tolerant maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids (TAES176 and P3223) and a drought-susceptible hybrid (P3225) during the flowering stage. Root systems were grown in two soil compartments – a drier upper soil and a wetter deep soil. The plants were shaded for 3 h during the daytime. Soil volumetric water content (Øv) in the upper pots was measured with time domain reflectometry (TDR) before and after shading. An increase in Øv in the upper pot was detected with TDR in the drought-tolerant hybrids following 3 h of shading, but not in the drought-susceptible hybrid. Furthermore, water exuded from roots in the top soil layers was greater in the more drought-tolerant TAES176 than in P3223 (489 vs. 288 g per pot in 3 h, P<0.005). The sizable amount of water from hydraulic lift allowed TAES176 to reach a peak transpiration rate 27–42% higher than the drought-susceptible hybrid P3225 on the days when the evaporative demand was high. To our knowledge, this is the first experiment that reveals a significant surge of transpiration due to hydraulic lift following midday shading. Hydraulic lift also prevented soil moisture depletion in the upper pots with TAES176, but not with P3223 or P3225. Root characteristics may be responsible for differences in hydraulic lift of the three maize hybrids. There were 2.3–3.3-fold more primary roots in the deep moist soil in P3223 and TAES176 than in P3225 that may enable these hybrids to absorb and transport water at faster rates. Therefore, more water can be exuded into the upper drier soil when transpiration is suppressed by shading. Larger primary roots (20–28% larger diameter) and a higher root volume in the upper soil in TAES176 and P3223 than in P3225 may contribute to higher root hydraulic conductance and greater water efflux from the roots. The negligible hydraulic lift in P3225 may also relate to higher night-time transpiration of the hybrid. This report has documented, for the first time, the existence of genetic variations in hydraulic lift among maize hybrids and links between hydraulic lift and drought tolerance within maize plants. It appears that one of drought tolerance mechanisms in maize may lie in the extent of hydraulic lift.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker J M and Van Bavel C H M 1986 Resistance of plant roots to water loss. Agron. J. 78, 641–644.
Baker J M and Van Bavel C H M 1987 Measurement of mass flow of water in the stems of herbacious plants. Plant Cell Environ. 10, 777–782.
Baker JMand Van Bavel C HM1988Water transfer through cotton plants connecting soil regions of differing water potential. Agron. J. 80, 993–997.
Bates L M and Hall A E 1981 Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status. Oecologia 50, 62–65.
Belford R K, Klepper B and Rickman R W 1987 Studies of intact shoot-root systems of field-grown winter wheat. II. Root and shoot development patterns as related to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron. J. 79, 310–319.
Caldwell M M 1990Water parasitism stemming from hydraulic lift: A quantitative test in the field. Isr. J. Bot. 39, 395–402.
Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1989 Hydraulic lift: Water efflux from upper roots improve effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1–5.
Caldwell M M, Dawson T E and Richards J H 1998 Hydraulic lift: Consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113, 151–161.
Corak S J, Blevins D G and Pallardy S G 1987 Water transfer in an alfalfa/maize association. Plant Physiol. 84, 582–586.
Dalton F N and Poss J A 1990 Soil water content and salinity assessment for irrigation scheduling using time-domain reflectometry: Principles and applications. Acta Hortic. 278, 381–393.
Dawson T E 1993 Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95, 565–574.
Dawson T E 1996 Determinating water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: The roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiol. 16, 263–272.
Dawson T E 1997 Water loss from tree roots influences soil water and nutrient status and plant performance. In Radical Biology: Advances and Perspectives in the Function of Plant Roots. Eds HE Flores, JP Lynch and DM Eissenstat. pp 235–250. Am. Soc. of Plant Physiol., Rockville.
Dirksen C and Raats P A C 1985Water uptake and release by alfalfa roots. Agron. J. 77, 621–626.
Emerman S H and Dawson T E 1995 Ecological implications of soil macropores. In Fifteenth American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Ed. HJ Morel-Seytoux. pp. 33–47.Hydrology Days Publication, Atherton, CA.
Emerman S H 1996 Towards a theory of hydraulic lift in trees and shrubs. In Sixteenth American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Ed. HJ Morel-Seytoux. pp. 147–157. Hydrology Days Publication, Atherton, CA.
Emerman S H and Dawson T E 1996 Hydraulic lift and its influence on the water content of the rhizosphere: An example from sugar maple, Acer saccharum. Oecologia 108, 273–278.
Faiz S M A and Weatherley P E 1978 Further investigations into the location and magnitude of the hydraulic resistances in the soil: Plant system. New Phytol. 81, 19–28.
Faiz SMA and Weatherley P E 1982 Root contraction in transpiring plants. New Phytol. 92, 333–343.
Gallardo M, Eastham J, Gregory P J and Turner N C 1996 A comparison of plant hydraulic conductances in wheat and lupins. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 233–239.
Gavloski J E, Whitfield G H and Ellis C R 1992 Effect of restricted watering on sap flow and growth in corn (Zea mays L.). Can J. Plant Sci. 72, 361–368.
Guei R G and Wassom C E 1993 Genetics of osmotic adjustment in breeding maize for drought tolerance. Heredity 71, 436–441.
Hamblin A P and Tennant D 1987 Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: How well are they correlated? Aust. J. Agric. Res., 38, 513–27.
Horton J L and S C Hart 1998 Hydraulic lift: a potentially important ecosystem process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 232–235.
Laboski C A M, Dowdy R H, Allmaras R R and Lamb J A 1998 Soil strength and water content influences on corn root distribution in a sandy soil. Plant Soil 203, 239–247.
Larcher W 1980 Physiological plant ecology. 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lascano R L and Van Bavel C H M1984 Root water uptake and soil water distribution: test of an availability concept. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 233–237.
Meinzer F C and Grantz D A 1991 Coordination of stomatal, hydraulic, and canopy boundary layer properties: Do stomata balance conductances by measuring transpiration? Physiol. Plant. 83, 324–329.
Mooney H A, Gulmon S L, Rundel P W and Ehleringer J 1980 Further observations on the water relations of Prosopis tamarugo of the Northern Atacama Desert. Oecologia 44, 177–180.
Nobel P S and Cui M 1992a Shrinkage of attached roots of Opuntia ficus-indica in response to lowered water potentials-predicted consequences for water uptake or loss to soil. Ann. Bot. 70, 485–491.
Nobel P S and Cui M 1992b Hydraulic conductances of the soil, the root-soil air gap and the root: Changes for desert succulents in drying soil. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 319–326.
Passioura J B 1972 The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23, 745–752.
Phillips J G and Riha S J 1994 Root growth, water uptake and canopy development in Eucalyptus viminalis seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 21, 69–78.
Premachandra G S, Saneoka H, Fujita K and Ogata S 1992 Osmotic adjustment and stomatal response to water deficits in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1451–1456.
Richards J H and Caldwell M M 1987 Hydraulic lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73, 486–489.
Saliendra N Z and Meinzer F C 1992 Genotypic, developmental and drought-induced differences in root hydraulic conductance of contrasting sugarcane cultivars. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1209–1217.
Shone M G T and Flood A V 1980 Studies on the uptake and loss of water by barley roots in relation to changes in root resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 1147–1159.
Topp G C, Davis J L and Annan A P 1980 Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Res. 16, 574–582.
Topp G C, Watt M and Hayhoe H N 1996 Point specific measurement and monitoring of soil water content with an emphasis on TDR. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76, 307–316.
Van Bavel C H M and Baker J M 1985 Water transfer by plant roots from wet to dry soil. Naturwissenchaften 72, 606–607.
Wan C, Sosebee R E and McMichael B L 1993 Does hydraulic lift exist in shallow-rooted species? A quantitative examination with a half-shrub Gutierrezia sarothrae. Plant Soil 153, 11–17.
Wan C, Sosebee R E and McMichael B L 1996 Lateral root development and hydraulic conductance in four populations of Gutierrezia sarothrae. Environ. Exp. Bot. 36, 157–165.
Williams K, Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1993 The influence of shade and clouds on soil water potential: The buffered behavior of hydraulic lift. Plant Soil 157, 83–95.
Yambao E B, Ingram K T and Real J G 1992 Root xylem influence on the water relations and drought resistance of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 925–932.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, C., Xu, W., Sosebee, R.E. et al. Hydraulic lift in drought-tolerant and -susceptible maize hybrids. Plant and Soil 219, 117–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740511326
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740511326