Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Faculty Inquiry Groups as Communities of Practice for Faculty Professional Development

  • Published:
Journal of Formative Design in Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many faculty in higher education have little-to-no formal preparation in the process of instructional design and the use of technology for learning, especially in research-intensive contexts. As such, professional development opportunities that focus on these issues play an important role in supporting best practices in teaching and learning. Communities of practice in the form of faculty inquiry groups (FIGs) may provide an effective avenue for faculty to enhance their awareness and implementation of technology-enhanced instructional strategies. This article describes the design and development of a series of faculty inquiry groups at a Research I institution and provides results of a comprehensive evaluation of those groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Productivity & Quality Center [APQC]. (2001). Building and sustaining communities of practice: Continuing success in knowledge management. Houston: APQC Publications

  • Bond, M. A., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Building communities of practice for distance educators. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., & DuRussel, L. A. (1999, July). Assessing knowledge construction in online learning communities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Artificial Intelligence in Education, Lemans, France (ERIC Document Reproduction No. Ed 446897).

  • Henning, P. H. (2004). Everyday cognition and situated learning. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 143–168). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Cernusca, D., & Ionas, G. (2007). Constructivism and instructional design: the emergence of the learning sciences and design research. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 45–52). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(4), 487–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, P. A. (2003). Teachers as adult learners: a new perspective. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, E., & Peed-Neal, I. (2010). Promoting your program and grounding it in the institution. In K. J. Gillespie, D. L. Robertson, & Associates (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (2nd ed., pp. 99–115). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, P., & Demb, A. (2004). Change dynamics and leadership in technology implementation. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(6), 636–666 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu/stable/3838771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: thinking as social practice. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (Vol. Vol. 429, pp. 1–20). Washington: American Psychological Association Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu:8080/books/10096/018

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russ-Eft, D. F., & Preskill, H. S. (2009). Evaluation in organizations: a systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. Cambridge, Mass: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, R. M., & Andriessen, J. H. E. (2006). The assessment of communities of practice. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wach, H. (2007). Changing needs, changing models: instructional technology training at Bronx Community College. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(5), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Berlin: Springer Verlag and the Open University.

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.

  • Young, M. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara B. Lockee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bond, M.A., Lockee, B.B. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Faculty Inquiry Groups as Communities of Practice for Faculty Professional Development. J Form Des Learn 2, 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0015-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0015-7

Keywords

Navigation