Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of membrane extraction with traditional extraction methods for biodiesel production

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

Three traditional methods for the refining step in biodiesel production were compared: (i) washing with distilled water; (ii) washing with acid (HCl); and (3) dissolving and extracting in a solvent (hexane or petroleum ether) and then washing with distilled water. Biodiesel with a high purity (97.5%) could be obtained by all three methods, but serious emulsification occurred during the refining processes, which led to high refining losses. A novel refining method was developed by using hollow fiber membrane extraction, and polysulfone was selected as the most suitable membrane. This process effectively avoided emulsification during refining and decreased the refining loss. The purity of the biodiesel obtained was about 99%; and other properties, such as density, kinematic viscosity, water content, and acid value, conformed to the standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma, F., and M.A. Hanna, Biodiesel Production: A Review, Bioresour. Technol. 70:1–15 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vicente, G., M. Martinez, and J. Aracil, Integrated Biodiesel Production: A Comparison of Different Homogeneous Catalysts Systems, Bioresour. Technol. 92:297–305 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freedman, B., and E.H. Pryde, Variables Affecting the Yields of Fatty Esters from Transesterified Vegetable Oils, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:1638–1643 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamad, I.A., and O.A. Ali, Experimental Evaluation of the Transesterification of Waste Palm Oil into Biodiesel, Bioresour. Technol. 85:253–256 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman, B., R.O. Butterfied, and E.H. Pryde, Transesterificaton Kinetics of Soybean Oil, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 63:1375–1380 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dorado, M.P., E. Ballesteros, and F.J. Lopez, Optimization of Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterification Brassica carinata Oil for Biodiesel Production, Energy Fuels 18:77–83 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Antolin, G., F.V. Tinaut, Y. Briceno, V. Castano, C. Perez, and A.I. Ramirez, Optimisation of Biodisel Production by Sunflower Oil Transesterification, Bioresour. Technol. 83:111–114 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Encinar, J.M., J.F. Gonzalez, J.J. Rodriguez, and A. Tejedor, Biodiesel Fuels from Vegetable Oils: Transesterification of Cynara cardunculus L. Oils with Ethanol, Energy Fuels 16:443–450 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karaosmanoglu, F., K.B. Cigizoglu, M. Tuter, and S. Ertekin, Investigation of the Refining Step of Biodiesel Production, Ibid. 10:890–895 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A.I.D. Fuel Oils Ltd., Bio Diesel, http://www.aidfuelois.co.uk/h&s/biodiesel.htm (accessed February 2004).

  11. Gabelman, A., and S.T. Hwang, Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactors, J. Membr. Sci. 159:61–106 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Zhu.

About this article

Cite this article

He, H.Y., Guo, X. & Zhu, S.L. Comparison of membrane extraction with traditional extraction methods for biodiesel production. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 83, 457–460 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-006-1226-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-006-1226-7

Key Words

Navigation