Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Good Agricultural Practises On Energy Use Effectiveness On Mandarin Production and Environmental

Auswirkungen der guten landwirtschaftlichen Praxis auf die Effizienz des Energieeinsatzes im Hinblick auf Mandarinenproduktion und Umwelt

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, Good Agricultural Practices for mandarin production and their effects on the efficient energy use and environmental were examined. This paper presents the results of a survey conducted in the Adana province between January and February 2017. Data used in this study were obtained from 87 farmers and consultant engineers who practice good agriculture in mandarin production using a face-to-face interview method. In this research, the total energy requirement for the mandarin production was 4686.46 MJ kg−1. The energy use efficiency indicator, efficiency and specific energy values were 1.92, 0.52 kg MJ−1 and 0.92 MJ kg−1 respectively. As a result of the research, renewable energy ratio was determined as 7.79%, and non-renewable energy ratio was determined as 86.17% in the total energy input. When the effects of the survey are compared with those of the literature, it shows that good farming practices in Turkey affect energy efficiency and environmental expectations in production positively, albeit at a depressed point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2013) FAO Statistical Yearbook. World food and agriculture. www.fao.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2015) Turkish Statistical Institute Data 2014. www.tüik.gov.tr. Accessed 22 Feb 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili ME (2012) Determination of energy using efficiency in lemon production. J Agric Mach Sci 8(2):199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicek A, Erkan O (1996) Research and sampling methods in agricultural economics. Gaziosmanpaşa University Agricultural Faculty Publications, vol 12. Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat (Course notes series no: 6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener HM, Akbolat D, Ekinci C (2006) Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province. Energy Convers Manag 47:1761–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatırlı SA, Ozkan B, Fert C (2006) Energy input and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renew Energy 31(4):427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorzadeh SH, Mahdavidamghani A, Enayatgholizadeh MR, Yousfi M (2011) Agrochemical input application and energy use efficiency of maize production systems in Dezful, Iran. Middle-East J Sci Res 9(2):153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Akram A, Rafiee A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Rafiee H (2010) Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renew Energy 35:1071–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadshirazi A, Akram A, Rafiee S, Avval SHM (2012) An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield in tangerine production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4515–4521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namdari M, Kangarshahi AA, Amiri NA (2011) Input-output energy analysis of citrus production in Mazandaran province of Iran. Afr J Agric Res 6(11):2558–2564

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Karadeniz F (2003) Energy requirement and an economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Conversat Manag 45:1821–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan B, Kurklu A, Akcaoz H (2004a) An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy 26:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C (2004b) Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renew Energy 29:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (2006) Impacts of organic farming on the efficiency of energy use in agriculture, an organic center state of science review. www.organic-center.org/reportfiles/ENERGY_SSR.pdf. Accessed 23.06.2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Shasta DS (1998) Energy use efficiency indicator for agriculture. www.usaskca/agriculture/caedac/pdf./mcrae. Accessed 24.06.2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JM (2002) On-farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. University of Flensburg, Flensburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlin H (1998) Why energy productivity is increasing: An I‑O analysis of Swedish agriculture. Agric Syst 56(4):443–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaldız O, Oztürk HH, Zeren Y, Başçetinçelik A (1993) Energy use in field crops of Turkey. 5. International Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Energy, Kuşadası, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi M, Mohammadi A (2011) Economical analysis and energy use efficiency in Alfalfa production systems in Iran. Sci Res Essays 6(11):2332–2336

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B (2005) An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renew Energy 30:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarini RL, Yaghoubi H, Akram A (2013) Energy use in the citrus production of Mazandaran province in Iran. African Crop Sci J 21(1):61–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Metin Dağtekin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Dağtekin, M. E. Bilgili and A. Beyaz declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dağtekin, M., Bilgili, M.E. & Beyaz, A. The Effects of Good Agricultural Practises On Energy Use Effectiveness On Mandarin Production and Environmental. Erwerbs-Obstbau 61, 55–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0395-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0395-5

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation