Abstract
Science and technology play an important part in present-day society. People need some degree of scientific and technological literacy to cope with the challenges and possibilities of the many products, devices and processes available. Robotics is a good example of this. For many people it is a black box. The way it functions is hidden under its superficial appearance, which may be that of a coffee machine, a squeaking baby doll, or a thermostat. People may learn to push the right buttons but remain unaware of what goes on underneath. Suchignorance may alienate people from technology. Primary schools can play a decisive role in preparing children for their future, yet science and technology do not have a strong focusin primary education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann, E. (1991). The Agency Model of Transactions: Toward an Understanding of Children’s Theory of Control. In J. Montangero & A. Trypho (Eds.), Psychologie génétique et sciences cognitives (pp. 63–73). Geneva: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget.
Ackermann, E. (2000). Relating to things that think. Play of Ideas and Ideas of Play, 13, 2–4.
Alexander, R. J. (2010). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.
Anderson, V., & Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics. Waltham, MA: Pegasus.
Astolfo, D., Ferrari, M., & Ferrari, G. (2007). Building robots with LEGO® Mindstorms® NXT: The ultimate tool for MindstormsTM maniacs. Burlington, MA: Syngress Publishing.
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: making meaning through talk.. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Inc.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.
Carlsen, W. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (Vol. 6, pp. 133–144). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Disessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9.
Hacker, M., de Vries, M. J., & Rossouw, A. (2009). CCETE Project, Concepts and Contexts in Engineering and Technology Education (No. DUE 0314910). New York, Delft: Hofstra University & Delft University of Technology.
Hackling, M. W. (2007). Inquiry and investigation in primary science. In V. Dawson & G. Venville (Eds.), The art of teaching primary science (pp. 127–148). Crows Nest, NSW: Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Introduction. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice. Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 1–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lea, Publishers.
Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training and Development, 50(1), 54–59.
Krumholtz, N. (1998). Techno-logic: A Micro-world for Constructivist Science and Technology learning [Electronic Version]. ICCE98. Retrieved 2006 6, May fromhttp://www.phantom2.com/papr_tch.html
Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O'Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding Techniques of Expert Human Tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding Students Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues (pp. 108-144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Levy, S. T., & Mioduser, D. (2008). Does it “want” or “was it programmed to…”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(4), 337–359.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (2001). Function and functionalism: A synthetic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 75–94.
Mioduser, D., Venezky, R. L., & Gong, B. (1996). Students' perceptions and designs of simple control systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(3), 363–388.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Nourbakhsh, I., Hamner, E., Lauwers, T., Berstein, D., & Disalvo, C. (2006). A roadmap for technological literacy and a vehicle for getting there: Educational robotics and the TeRK project. Paper presented at the The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN06), Hatfield, UK.
Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.
Petre, M., & Price, B. (2004). Using Robotics to Motivate "Back Door" Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 9(2), 147–158.
Prebble, T., Hargraves, H., Leach, L., Naidoo, K., Suddaby, G., & Zepke, N. (2004). Impact of Student Support Services and Academic Development Programmes on Student Outcomes in Undergraduate Tertiary Study: A Synthesis of the Research.: New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Resnick, M., & Martin, F. (1991). Children and artificial life. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Vol. 10, pp. 379–390). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Rohaan, E. J. (2009). Testing teacher knowledge for technology teaching in primary schools. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Slangen, L. A. M. P., Fanchamps, L. J. A., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2008). A case study about supporting the development of thinking by means of ICT and concretization tools. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 18(3), 18.
Slangen, L. A. M. P., van Keulen, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). What pupils learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education Retrieved 01-08, 2010, fromhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/w7245131xl0088jg/
Smith, D. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (Vol. 6, pp. 163–197). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stes, A., Clement, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2007). The effectiveness of a faculty training programme: long-term and institutional impact. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 99– 110.
van Lith, P. (2006). Masterclass Robotica. Limbricht: Elektuur.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and instruction, 11(4-5), 381–419.
Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 1–41). London: Elsevier/JAL.
Wisse, M. (2008). Robots, sensoren, algoritmes en motoren (Robots, sensors, algorithms and engines). In R. Dijkgraaf, L. Fresco, T. Gualthérie van Weezel & M. Calmthout van (Eds.), De bètacanon, wat iedereen moet weten van de natuurwetenschappen (The science canon, what everyone should know about science) (pp. 185-187). Amsterdam: De Volkskrant en Meulenhoff b.v.
Wyeth, P., Venz, M., & Wyeth, G. (2004). Scaffolding children’s robot building and programming activities. RoboCup 2003: Robot Soccer World Cup VII, 308–319.
Xun, G. E., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problemsolving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.
Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slangen, L.A.M.P., Keulen, J.v., Gravemeijer, K. (2011). Preparing Teachers to Teach Robotics in Primary Schools. In: Vries, M.J.d., Kuelen, H.v., Peters, S., Molen, J.W.v.d. (eds) Professional Development for Primary Teachers in Science and Technology. International Technology Education Studies, vol 9. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_14
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-713-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)
