Skip to main content

Multi-localized Diversified Family Farming in Nicaragua

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diversity of Family Farming Around the World

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This hacienda or estate belonged to the Montealegre Lacayo family, which was part of an oligarchy of landowning families that had influence over the politics not only of Nicaragua, but also those of Guatemala and Costa Rica.

  2. 2.

    Twenty open interviews, 31 semi-directive interviews and 75 rapid surveys, life stories of all members of 10 family subgroups, focus groups of 20 randomly selected individuals in the community.

  3. 3.

    Our interviews show, however, that while the head of the family has the last word in public, his wife is the one who ensures reproduction and redistribution within the family, who guarantees social cohesion, and who, ultimately, is always consulted in her role as the chief adviser to the head of the family, as part of the intimacy of their relationship.

  4. 4.

    We calculated the investment capacity by dividing the total income by the costs of the activity (sum of intermediate consumption and salaries).

  5. 5.

    where: i is the different sources of income; n the number of income sources; p the share of each income source in total income.

  6. 6.

    The colour of certain types of capital specifies how the subgroup contributes to the allocation of capital of the extended group.

References

  • Bélières J-F, Bonnal P, Bosc P-M, Losch B, Marzin J, Sourisseau J-M, Baron V, Loyat J (2013) Les agricultures familiales du monde. Définitions, contributions et politiques publiques. Cirad/AFD, January 2013, 276 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J, Bigourdan C (2001) Diagnostic agro-socio-économique du Municipio de Cinco Pinos, Département de Chinandega – Nicaragua: du système agraire reproductible de défriche-brûlis à la crise foncière actuelle. Rapport de stage de DAA de l’Ensaia et du DAT de l’Esat/Cnearc, Iram, Montpellier, 86 p. Retrieved 17 December 2017. https://web.supagro.inra.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=61851

  • Cortes G, Fréguin-Gresh S, Guétat-Bernard H, Sourisseau J-M (2014) Les systèmes familiaux multilocalisés: un modèle d’analyse de la ruralité contemporaine aux Suds. Document de travail ART-Dev 2014-12. Retrieved 17 December 2017. http://art-dev.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/wpARTDev_2014_12.pdf

  • Fernández PA (1999) Arreglos y desarreglos familiares (Centroamérica y Nicaragua). Revista Chilena de Antropología 15:131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fréguin-Gresh S, Trousselle A, Le Coq JF, Perez FJ (2012) Archipiélagos familiares rurales en Nicaragua: la realidad del bono demogràfico ante el cambio estructural y la globalización. Communication world rural sociology congress, Lisbon, Portugal, July 29 August 4, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Freguin-Gresh S, Cortes G, Sourisseau J-M, Guetat-Bernard H (2015) Le système familial multilocalisé. Proposition analytique et méthodologique pour interroger les liens entre migrations et développement rural au Sud. Mondes en Développement 43(172):13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby Vado AH, Pérez FJ (2007) Structural implications of economic liberalization on agriculture and rural development. RuralStruc program Nicaragua – Phase I. Managua: Nitlapán, Universidad Centroamericana, 128 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim SS (2006) From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. J Hum Dev 7(3):398–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodelet D. (dir) (1989) Les représentations sociales. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 450 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coq J-F, Fréguin-Gresh S, Saénz-Segura F, Perez FJ (2013) Transfert de la notion de développement durable dans les politiques publiques centroaméricaines: Lecture croisée des évolutions de référentiels et des trajectoires de politiques rurales au Costa Rica et au Nicaragua. Communication paper for the international conference Canal 2013, 20–23 March 2013, Montpellier, France. Retrieved 17 January 2018. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/569982/1/document_569982.pdf

  • Lenoir R (2003) Généalogie de la morale familiale. Le Seuil, Paris, 587 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Levard L, Marín Y, Pérez FJ, Ruíz A, Serra HL (2000) Potencialidades y limitantes para el desarrollo agropecuario del municipio de Somotillo. Fondo internacional para el desarrollo agrícola, FIDA y el Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Nitlapàn, Universidad Centroamericana, UCA, Managua, 148 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldidier C, Marchetti P (eds) (1996) El Campesino Finquero y el potencial economic del campesinado nicaragüense. Tomo 1. Tipología y regionalización agrosocioeconómica de los sistemas de producción y los sectores sociales en el Agro nicaragüense. Instituto de Investigación y desarrollo Nitlapàn, UCA, Managua, 174 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlet M (2002) Nicaragua. Impact et limites de la réforme agraire sandiniste. Cahier de propositions politiques foncières et réformes agraires. Retrieved 17 December 2017. http://www.agter.asso.fr/article238_fr.html

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New York, 366 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourisseau J-M, Bosc P-M, Fréguin-Gresh S, Bélières J-F, Bonnal P, Le Coq J-F, Anseeuw W, Dury S (2012) Les modèles familiaux de production agricole en question. Quelle méthode pour analyser leur diversité ? Autrepart 62:159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trousselle A (2012) Les mobilités rurales au Nicaragua, au prisme du transnationalisme et des modèles d’archipel familiaux: caractéristiques et perspectives. Stage de fin d’études Istom, Paris. Retrieved 17 December 2017. http://portailbiblio.ipsl-edu.com/gediweb5/?2&docId=94398&page=home&displayTab=2

  • Trousselle A (2013) Pluriactivité et mobilité, deux composantes structurantes des espaces ruraux nicaraguayens. Quelles approches systémiques pour les appréhender ? Mémoire de master 2 recherche de l’Université Paul-Valéry, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Fréguin-Gresh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Éditions Quæ

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fréguin-Gresh, S., Trousselle, A., Cortes, G. (2018). Multi-localized Diversified Family Farming in Nicaragua. In: Bosc, PM., Sourisseau, JM., Bonnal, P., Gasselin, P., Valette, É., Bélières, JF. (eds) Diversity of Family Farming Around the World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1617-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics