Summary
In 1996, CEFIC (Chemical Industry Council of Europe) established the Endocrine Modulator Study Group (EMSG) to investigate and better understand the endocrine disruption issue, i.e., ‘the hypothesis that man-made chemicals are causing adverse effects in both humans and wildlife by altering the hormone system’. EMSG believes that the debate should be based on high quality scientific investigations which are rigorously peer reviewed. This is the reason why an 8 million US$ budget has been made available to fund 18 independent research projects with the objective of providing answers to the following questions:
-
are small amounts of chemicals in the environment interfering with the endocrine systems of humans and wildlife leading to harmful effects?
-
do low-dose exposures, occurring in utero, result in adverse effects in later life?
-
if there is a causal link to industrial chemicals, how can the risk be managed satisfactorily?
This presentation describes the research strategy developed by the European Chemical Industry and emphasises on the need for a real scientific debate on an international level to establish the facts and common evaluation methods. This scientific programme covers three main areas of research:
-
human male reproductive health,
-
environmental and wildlife health,
-
testing strategies and risk assessment.
By supporting this programme, the intention of the European Chemical Industry is to contribute to the consolidation of the existing knowledge and the establishment of a solid scientific framework to assist decision-makers. The results will be published in peerreviewed journals and the information will be shared through an open and transparent process. First results are expected to be published in the second half of 2000.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby, J., Houthoff, E., Kennedy, S.J., Stevens, J., Bars, R., Jekat, F.W., Campbell, P., Van Miller, J., Carpanini, F.M., and Randall, G.L.P. (1997) The Challenge Posed by Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals, Environmental Health Perspective 105, 164–169.
Bate, R. (1997) What Risk? Science, Politics and Public Health, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 328 pp.
Bignert, A., Olsson, M., Persson, W., Jensen, S., Zakrisson, S., Litzén, K., Eriksson, U., Häggberg, L., and Alsberg, T. (1998), Temporal trends of organochlorines in Northern Europe 1967–1995, Environmental Pollution 99, 177–198.
CEFIC-EMSG - Chemical Industry Council of Europe - Endocrine Modulator Study Group (1998) CEFIC position paper on the EU Commission communication on a community strategy for endocrine disrupters, http://www.cefic.org/lri/emsg/.
CEFIC-LRI - Chemical Industry Council of Europe - Lang Range Research Initiative (1999) Research Programme, http://www.cefic.org/lri/.
Desbrow, C., Routledge, E.J., Brighty, G.C., Sumpter, J.P., and Waldock, M. (1998) Identification of oestrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 1. Chemical fractionation and in vitro biological screening, Environmental Science and Technology 32, 1549 1558.
DETR — Department of Environment, Transport, and the Regions (1998) EDMAR Programme, Endocrine Disruption in the Marine Environment, http://www.detr.gov.uk/.
EC - European Commission (1996) European Workshop on the Impact of Endocrine Disrupters on Human Health and Wildlife, Report of Proceedings, 2–4 December 1996, Weybridge, UK, Report EUR 17549 from the European Commission.
ECETOC (1996) Environmental Oestrogens, A Compendium of Test Methods,ECETOC Document no. 33, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, July 1996, 27 pp.
IPCS - International Programme on Chemical Safety (1999) Endocrine definition available on IPCS website: http://www.who.int/pcs/emerging_issues/end_disrupt.htm.
Nolan, C. (1998) Endocrine Disrupters Research in the EU, Report of a meeting held in Brussels on November 4, 1997, Report EUR 18345, European Commission, Brussels.
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1997) Appraisal of test methods for sex-hormone-disrupting chemical, Draft detailed review paper, OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publication, Paris, France.
SCTEE - Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (1999) Human and wildlife health effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals, with emphasis on wildlife and on ecotoxicology test methods, Opinion of SCTEE, adopted on March 4.
Sherman, I.W., and Sherman, V.G. (1989) Biology: A Human Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Van Os, J.L., De Vries, M.J., Den Daas, N.H., and Kaal Lansbergen, L.M.K. (1997) Long-term trends in sperm counts of dairy bulls, Journal of Andrology 18, 725–731.
Wilson, S.J., Murray, J.L., and Huntington, H.P. (eds) (1998) Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway.
Wright, A.N., and Fischli, A.E. (1998) Natural and anthropogenic environmental oestrogens, the scientific basis for risk assessment, Pure and Applied Chemistry 70 (9), special issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lecloux, A.J., Taalman, R. (2001). Endocrine Disruption — The Industry Perspective. In: Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P., Hens, L., Howard, C.V. (eds) Endocrine Disrupters. Environmental Science and Technology Library, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9769-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9769-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5729-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9769-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive