Skip to main content

An Analysis of Express in Aesthetics: A Reevaluation of the Literature

  • Chapter
Emotion in Aesthetics

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 64))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

The formalist-expressionist debate has been successful in pointing out to us that we are not clear as to what, if anything, “express” means. The term seems to be as unclear now as it has ever been. Some have said that no one knows what the expressiveness of music means (Kivy 1989). And others have given up looking for a definition at all.2 It is predictable that without at least a sound theory of meaning and emotion, sentences involving these terms may as well be strung along in any way at all.

Music: A note of sadness.

The terms ‘emotion’ and feeling’…have no clear and distinct meaning.

Sparshott 1994: 24

Music is irrational and cannot affect the soul or the emotions, and is no more an expressive art than cookery.

Philodemus1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Philodemus in Bosanquet 1922: 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meidner 1985: 349.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grout 1980: 506–507.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Mattheson, Der vollkommene Cappellmeister in Buelow 1980: 802.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meidner 1985: 349.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shibles 1974a, 1978abc, 1987, 1991, 1992a, 1994a, 1995d, 1995f.

    Google Scholar 

  7. cf. Khatchadourian 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scruton 1987: 169, 170.

    Google Scholar 

  9. cf. Dewey 1958: 269.

    Google Scholar 

  10. cf. Shibles 1970, 1972: 82– l 02, 1995a.

    Google Scholar 

  11. cf. Shibles 1989c.

    Google Scholar 

  12. In Townsend 1988: 132ff.; cf. Hartley 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bosanquet 1894: 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  14. cf. Beck 1967, Calhoun & Solomon 1984, Ellis 1994, Ellis & Grieger 1977, Gordon 1987, W. Lyons 1980, Maultsby & Klärner 1984, Neu 1977, Rorty 1980, Shibles 1974a, 1978abc, 1987, 1988, 1989a, 1990abc, 1991, 1992ab, 1994ae, 1995adf, Solomon 1983, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. cf. Rist 1969: 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. cf. Collingwood, Croce, Dewey, Lipps’ empathy theory, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. cf. Davies 1986: 160, Dewey 1958: 104.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noted by Hansen 1974: 346 in Ferguson’s Music as Metaphor.

    Google Scholar 

  19. cf. Shibles 1995d.

    Google Scholar 

  20. cf. Dewey 1894, I: 556.

    Google Scholar 

  21. cf. Ward & Throop 1989: 465.

    Google Scholar 

  22. cf. Shibles 1974c: 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Contrast Mew 1985a: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shibles 1974a: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collingwood 1938: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cassirer 1945, 1953–1957; cf. A recent critique of Langer’s theory is q g y given by Davies 1994: 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  27. cf. Hanfling 1992: 64. See also the recent critique of the views of Goodman by Davies 1994: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  28. cf. Kövecses 1990, Lakoff & Johnson 1980; Shibles 1971ab, 1974a: 231–261.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bernstein 1976: 103ff. cf. Buelow 1980, “Rhetoric and Music.”

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Shibles, “The Metaphorical Method.” 1973ab, 1974b.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kivy 1990: 159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shibles, W. (1995). An Analysis of Express in Aesthetics: A Reevaluation of the Literature. In: Emotion in Aesthetics. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8579-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8579-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4593-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8579-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics