Abstract
This present analysis began with a citation from Tillich, which would be good to repeat here:
-
Der Prüfstein der Theologie ist ihre Fähigkeit, die absolute Spannung zwischen dem Bedingten und dem Unbedingten zu erhalten.1
-
How has Tillich’s theology passed this test? How has his interpretation of the relationship between the finite and the infinite, and more particularly between God and man, fared in reference to this criterion? The answer can only be given by enumerating certain conclusions individually.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Weigel, G., “Recent Protestant Theology,” Theological Studies, 14 (1953), p. 573
Cf. Hamilton, K., The System and the Gospel; ibid, “Paul Tillich and the Idealistic Appraisal of Christianity,” The Scottish Journal of Theology, 13 (1960), pp. 33–44
Cf. Hamilton, K., “Schleiermacher and Relational Theology,” The Journal of Religion, 44 (1964) pp. 29–39.
P. van Buren, The Secular Meaning of the Gospel, (London: SCM Press) 1963
G. Vahanian, The Death of God, (New York: George Braziller) 1961
G. Vahanian, Wait without Idols, (New York: Braziller) 1964
K. Rahner, “Eine Antwort,” Orientierung, 14 (1950) pp. 141–145
E. Brisbois, “Le désir de voir Dieu et la métaphysique du vouloir selon saint Thomas,” Nouvelle revue théologique 43 (1936) pp. 1103–1105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osborne, K.B. (1969). General Conclusions and Evaluations Regarding Tillich’s Interpretation of the God-Man Relationship. In: New Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0261-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0782-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive