Skip to main content

General Conclusions and Evaluations Regarding Tillich’s Interpretation of the God-Man Relationship

  • Chapter
New Being
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

This present analysis began with a citation from Tillich, which would be good to repeat here:

  • Der Prüfstein der Theologie ist ihre Fähigkeit, die absolute Spannung zwischen dem Bedingten und dem Unbedingten zu erhalten.1

  • How has Tillich’s theology passed this test? How has his interpretation of the relationship between the finite and the infinite, and more particularly between God and man, fared in reference to this criterion? The answer can only be given by enumerating certain conclusions individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weigel, G., “Recent Protestant Theology,” Theological Studies, 14 (1953), p. 573

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Hamilton, K., The System and the Gospel; ibid, “Paul Tillich and the Idealistic Appraisal of Christianity,” The Scottish Journal of Theology, 13 (1960), pp. 33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Hamilton, K., “Schleiermacher and Relational Theology,” The Journal of Religion, 44 (1964) pp. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. van Buren, The Secular Meaning of the Gospel, (London: SCM Press) 1963

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Vahanian, The Death of God, (New York: George Braziller) 1961

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Vahanian, Wait without Idols, (New York: Braziller) 1964

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Rahner, “Eine Antwort,” Orientierung, 14 (1950) pp. 141–145

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Brisbois, “Le désir de voir Dieu et la métaphysique du vouloir selon saint Thomas,” Nouvelle revue théologique 43 (1936) pp. 1103–1105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osborne, K.B. (1969). General Conclusions and Evaluations Regarding Tillich’s Interpretation of the God-Man Relationship. In: New Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0261-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0782-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics