Skip to main content

Tillich’s Interpretation of Old Being

  • Chapter
New Being
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional theology, whether in the Roman Catholic tradition or in the orthodox protestant tradition or in other similar traditions, has distinguished three basic elements of all reality: there is nature in its unelevated status (natura in puris naturalibus); there is nature elevated to the supernatural order (natura supernaturalis); and finally there is God. Even though there is a natura lapsa, the three orders remained: natural, supernatural, and divine. Theology has been busy explaining the relationship between these three orders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. among others, G. Weigel, “The Theological Significance of Paul Tillich,” Gregorianum, 37 (1956) pp. 49 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Dulles, “Paul Tillich and the Bible,” Theological Studies, 17 (1956) pp. 362 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. K. Hamilton, “Paul Tillich and the Idealistic Appraisal of Christianity,” Scottish Journal of Theology, 13 (1960), p. 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Weigel, “Recent Protestant Theology,” Theological Studies, 14 (1953), p. 582

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. T. E. McCullough, “The Ontoogy of Paul Tillich and Biblical Personalism.” Scottish Journal of Theology, 15 (1962) p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. B. Hammond, “Tillich on a Personal God,” The Journal of Religion, 44, (1964) p. 290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tillich “Dimensions, Levels, and the Unity of Life,” Kenyon Alumni Bulletin, 17 (1959) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Scheffczyk, “Die Erbschuld zwischen Naturalismus und Existentialismus,” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift, 15 (1964) pp. 16 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. cf. Tillich, A “Christentum imd Marxismus,” Politische Studien, 11 (1960) pp. 150–152.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. M. van Bizren, The Secular Meaning of the Gospel, (London: SCM Press) 1963, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tillich, “Dimensionen, Schichten, und die Einheit des Seins,” Gesammelte Werke, 4 (1961) p. 122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osborne, K.B. (1969). Tillich’s Interpretation of Old Being. In: New Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0782-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0261-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0782-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics