Skip to main content

Encounter Foreign Metaphors: A Cross-Cultural Online Study

  • Chapter
Sprache, Kultur und Zielgruppen
  • 3260 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time. Metaphor was merely considered as a literary device of language for its mysterious power of reasoning and rhetoric beauty. Aristotle wrote in his Poetics. “[T]he greatest thing by far is to be a master of metaphor” (Aristotle, trans. 1971). Started from the last century, Philosophers like (1936) and (1955) sparked an interest in rediscovering metaphor and claimed that metaphor played a vital role in thought. In 1980, Lakoff and Johnson collected systematic language evidence and argued from a cognitive perspective that.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1971): Poetics. Butcher, Samuel Henry (Trans.) In: Hazard, Adams (ed.): Critical theory since Plato. New York, 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max (1955): Metaphor. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian society 55: 273–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Max (1979): More about metaphor. In: Ortony, Andrew (ed.): Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, Lee & Deal, Terrence (1984): Modern Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, Lee & Deal, Terrence (1991): Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, Joep (2002): On the organisational identity metaphor. In: British Journal of Management, 13 (3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, Joep (2004): What are we playing at? Theatre, organization and the use of metaphor. In: Organization Studies, 25, 705–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, Joep (2005): Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. In: Academy of Management Review, 30 (4), 751–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, Joep (2006): Metaphor and the dynamics of knowledge in organization theory: A case study of the organizational identity Metaphor. In: Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark (1999): Metonymy and conceptual integration. In: Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Gunter Radden (eds.): Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark (2003): The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, Dedre & Gentner, Donald (1983): Flowing waters and teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In: Gentner, Dedre & Stevens, Albert (eds.): Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ, 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, Dedre & Bowdle, Brain & Wolff, Philipp & Boronat, Consuelo (2001): Metaphor is like analogy In: Gentner, Dendre. & Holyoak, Keith (eds.): The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge MA, 199–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, Sam & Keysar, Boaz (1993): How metaphors work. In: Andrew Ortony (ed.): Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge. 401–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heineken, Edgar & Schulte, Frank & Ollesch, Heike (2003): Experimentalpsychologische Ausbildung in virtuellen Labor: Das Laboratorium für Online-Research (Lab.OR). In: Krampen, Günter & Zayer, Hermann (Hrsg.): Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation IV. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Robert & Levenhagen, Micahael (1995): Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. In: Journal of Management 21(6), 1057–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Andreas & Heineken, Edgar (2006): Leitbilder und Handeln-eine experimentelle Untersuchung zum metaphorischen Priming der Vorgesetzten-Mitarbeiter-Kommunikation. In: Crijns, Rogier & Thalheim, Janine (hrsg.): Kooperation und Effizenz in der Unternehmens-kommunikation Wiesbaden, 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya, Bipin (1992): Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inns, Dawn (2002): Metaphor in the literature of organizational analysis: A preliminary taxonomy and a glimps at a humanities-based perspective. In: Organization. 9(2), 305–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, Alfred & Hegele, Comelia & Klimmer, Matthias (1998): Kommunikation im organisatorischen Wandel. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Zoltán (2005): Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphor We Live by, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark (1989): More than Cool Reason. A field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Peter (1980): Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In: Sidowsk JB, Johnson JH & Williams TA (Editors): Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, USA, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, Wolf-Andreas (2003): Wissenskonstruktion als poetisches Verfahren: Wie Organisationen mit Metaphern Produkte und Identität erfinden. In: Geideck, Susan & Liebert, Wolf (Hrsg.): Sinnformeln. Lingistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern. Berlin, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Min (2005): Discussion of organizational metaphor. In: Chinese Journal of Management, 2(4), 660–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Gareth (1980): Paradigms, metaphors, puzzle solving in organization theory. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Gareth (1983): More on metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative: science. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Gareth (1986): Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Gareth (1993): Imagination: The Art of Creative Management. Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nückles, Matthias & Janetzko, Dietmar (1997): The role of semantics similarity in the comprehension of metaphor. In: Schafto, M. & Langley, P. (eds.): Nineteenth Annual Conference of the cognitive science society. Stanford, CA. 579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, Andrew (1979a): Metaphor: A multidimensional problem. In: Ortony, Andrew (ed.): Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, Andrew (1979b): The role of similarity in similes and metaphors. In: Ortony, Andrew (ed.): Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Tom (1992): Liberation Management: Necessary Disorganization for Nanosecond Nineties. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Michael (1990): From paradigms to images: The paradigm warrior turns post modernist guru. In: Personal Review, 19, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Ivor (1936): The Philosophy of Rhetoric, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Yeshayahu (1991): Schemata, categories and metaphor comprehension. In: Poetic Today, 12(1), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, Roger & Sternberg, Robert (1982): Understanding and appreciating metaphors. In: Cognition, 11, 203–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, Robert (1939): Cluster analysis, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, Haridimos (1991): The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. In: Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, Haridimos (1993): Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory, In: Organization Studies, 14(3), 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christopher M. Schmidt Dagmar Neuendorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhou, D., Heineken, E. (2007). Encounter Foreign Metaphors: A Cross-Cultural Online Study. In: Schmidt, C.M., Neuendorff, D. (eds) Sprache, Kultur und Zielgruppen. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5491-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics