Skip to main content
  • 1147 Accesses

Abstract

Managers are often confronted with the conflicting needs of implementing quick strategic changes on the one hand and ensuring stability within their firms on the other hand. If taken to an extreme level, both a high pace of change and a low pace of change can be detrimental to firm performance. This chapter suggests the rhythm of change as a means of balancing the conflicting forces of change and stability, presenting results from a longitudinal study of the European Insurance Industry between 1995 and 2004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abernathy, W. J. & Utterback, J. M. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80: 40-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, W., Erdönmez, M., & El Hage, B. 2005. Assekuranz 2015 -Retailmärkte im Umbruch. Zürich: Accenture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. 2004. The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1): 15-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. 2001. Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4): 645-563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, V. L., III & Duhaime, I. M. 1997. Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1): 13-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. & Nohria, N. 2000. Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3): 133-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. & Grove, A. S. 2007. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos - repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 965-979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. 1999. Marketing research: Methodological foundations (7 ed.). Orlando, FL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Sull, D. N. 2001. Strategy as Simple Rules, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79: 106-116: Harvard Business School Publication Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. & French, K. 1995. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance, 50: 131-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. 2010. Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change as a Duality. Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. 1994. Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1): 9-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. 2005. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 472-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., Ireland, R. D., & Best, A. 1998. Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms. British Journal of Management, 2(91-114).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science, 2(Special Issue): 88-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. & Glick, W. H. 1995. Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Q. N. 2001. Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26(4): 601-623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Q. N. & Mintzberg, H. 2003. The Rhythm of Change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4): 79-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, S. L. & Tushman, M. L. 1993. Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6): 1314-1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klarner, P. forthcoming, 2010. The Rhythm of Change - A Longitudinal Analysis of the European Insurance Industry, Dissertation, University of Geneva: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B. & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. & Kenney, M. 2004. Economic action does not take place in a vacuum: Understanding Cisco’s acquisition and development strategy. Industry and Innovation, 11(4): 299-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey&Company. 2006. Organizing for successful change management: A McKinsey Global survey. McKinsey Quarterly, June 2006: 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1179-1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. 1985. Applied linear statistical model (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, J. A. & Zenger, T. R. 2002. Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice. Organization Science, 13(5): 547-566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G. & Raisch, S. 2005. Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1): 90-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M. L. 1994. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1141-1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, P. 2007. The halo effect…and the eight other business delusions that deceive managers. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. & Kesner, I. F. 1996. Diversifying entry: Some ex ante explanations for postentry survival and growth. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 635-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B. 1996. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning: 541-578. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, I., Falkenberg, J., Meyer, C. B., & Haueng, A. C. 2002. Excessive Change: Coping Mechanisms and Consequences. Organizational Dynamics, 31(3): 296-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. & Romanelli, E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. C. B. M. S. (Eds.) (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 7: 171-222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. & Rosenkopf, L. 1996. Executive Succession, Strategic Reorientation and Performance Growth: A Longitudinal Study in the U.S. Cement Industry. Management Science, 42(7): 939-953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. 2000. Methods for Studying Innovation Processes. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F. & Barkema, H. 2002. Pace, Rhythm, and Scope: Process Dependence in Building a Profitable Multinational Corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7): 637-653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Versicherungswirtschaft, G. d. D. 2008. Statistisches Taschenbuch der Versicherungswirtschaft. Berlin: GDV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. 1992. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1): 72-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., Van de Bosch, F. A., Flier, B., & Gedajlovic, E. R. 2001. Following the herd or not? Patterns of renewal in the Netherlands and the UK. Long Range Planning, 34: 209-229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. & Pettigrew, A. 1999. The Temporal Development of Strategy: Patterns in the U.K. Insurance Industry. Organization Science, 10(5): 601-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klarner, P. (2010). Managing the Pace of Strategic Change: The Rhythm of Change as a Means of Balancing. In: More than Bricks in the Wall: Organizational Perspectives for Sustainable Success. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8945-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics