Skip to main content

Abstract

Autobiography has a double nature; it is both historical and literary. Particular autobiographies may embody aspects of this duality with varying degrees of purity or mixture, but, just as importantly, these two qualities are constituted by the approach taken by the interpreters of the texts. From a historical point of view an autobiography may be seen either as a source of data for biographical studies or as one biography among others — it is essentially a historical record, a source of information about the occurrence, sequence, and pattern of events. From a literary perspective an autobiography can be taken as a dramatic recounting of a particular period of time or as an imaginative presentation of a character from a unique perspective. Whereas questions about accuracy, comprehensiveness, and distortion might occupy the historian, matters of form, style, intention, and effect would interest the literary critic. This essay seeks to contribute to the study of religious autobiography, first, by relating these two perspectives to the psychological concepts of identity and generativity, and second, by examining a shift in the development of the Protestant ethic1 as it is reflected in the autobiographical writings of John Bunyan and Benjamin Franklin.

A briefer version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, in San Francisco, October 1973.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Talcott Parsons, New York 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Shumaker, English Autobiography: Its Emergence, Materials, and Form, Berkeley, Calif., 1954; B. J. Mandell, The Autobiographer’s Art, in: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 27, no. 2, Winter 1968, pp. 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Gusdorf, Conditions et limites de l’autobiographie, in: Formen der Selbstdarstellung: Analekten zu einer Geschichte des literarischen Selbstportraits, ed. G. Reichenkron, Berlin, 1956; R. Pascal, Design and Truth in Autobiography, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Hart, Notes for an Anatomy of Modern Autobiography, in: New Literary History, vol. 1, 1969–70, pp. 485–5n; W. L. Howarth, Some Principles of Autobiography, in: New Literary History, vol. 5, 1973–74, pp. 363–83; P. Lejeune, Le pacte autobiographique, in: Poétique, no. 14, 1973, pp. 137–162; E. W. Bross, L’autobiographie considereé comme acte littéraire, in: Poétique, no. 17, 1974, pp. 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. D. Hirsch, Validity in Interpretation, New Haven, Conn., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Sacks, The Psychological Implications of Genre Distinctions, in: Genre, vol. 1, 1968, pp. 106–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Ebner, Autobiography in Seventeenth-Century England: Theology and the Self, The Hague, 1971. D. Shea, Spiritual Autobiography in Early America, Princeton, 1968. O. C. Watkins, The Puritan Experience: Studies in Spiritual Autobiography, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. W. Bruss, Autobiography: The Changing Structure of a Literary Act, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Frye, The Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton, N. J., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howarth, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. R. Jauss, Levels of Identification of Hero and Audience, in: New Literary History, vol. 5, 1973–74, pp. 283–318.

    Google Scholar 

  12. This distinction, and several points in this paragraph, are made in an excellent paper by J. Starobinski, The Style of Autobiography, in: S. Chatman, ed., Literary Style: A Symposium, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Problemes de linguistique generale, Paris. 1966, p. 242; cited in Starobinski, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a full discussion of the autobiographical contract, and the relationship to fiction, biography, and other genres, cf. Lejeune, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Apologia Pro Vita Sua, New York, 1968, p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The theory of illocutionary acts was developed by J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, New York, 1965, and J. R. Searle, Speech Acts, Cambridge, 1969. The application of this theory to literature has begun to be made by R. Ohmann, Speech, Action, and Style, in: S. Chatman, ed., op. cit.; Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature, in: Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 4, 1971, pp. 1–19. The specific connection with autobiography has been made by Bruss, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Erikson, Identity and the Life Cycle, New York, 1959, pp. 23, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  18. cf. eg., R. Bushman, Jonathan Edwards as Great Man: Identity, Conversion and Leadership in the Great Awakening, in: Soundings, vol. 52, 1969, pp. 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Concept of Identity, The Hague, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Self-Realization and Social Definition: Two Aspects of Identity Formation, in: International Journal of Psycho-analysis, vol. 48, 1967, pp. 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Rapaport, Historical Introduction, in: E. Erikson, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Jacobson, The Self and the Object World, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Glover, Metapsychology or Metaphysics: A Psychoanalytic Essay, In: Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 35, 1966, pp. 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Leites, The New Ego, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Kohut, The Analysis of the Self, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Kohut, Thoughts on Narcissism and Narcissistic Rage, in: The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, vol. 27, 1972, pp. 360–400.

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. S. Wolf, J. E. Gedo, and D. M. Terman, On the Adolescent Process as a Transformation of the Self, in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 1, 1972, pp. 257–72.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Sandler and B. Rosenblatt, The Concept of the Representational World, in: The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, vol. 17, 1962, pp. 128–45.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For a discussion of ideal self, see J. Sandler, A. Holder, and D. Meers, The Ego Ideal and the Ideal Self, in: The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, vol. 18, 1963, pp. 139–58; see also R. Schafer, Ideals, the Ego Ideal, and the Ideal Self, in: R. R. Holt, ed. Motives and Thought, Psychological Issues Monograph, no. 18/19, New York, 1967. For a discussion of self-esteem as a function of harmony or discrepancy between the ideal and the actual self, see W. G. Joffe and J. Sandler, Some Conceptual Problems in the Consideration of Disorders of Narcissism, in: Journal of Child Psychotherapy, vol. 2,1967, pp. 56–66; also A. Reich, Pathologic Forms of Self-Esteem Regulation, in: The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, vol. 15, 1960, pp. 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Erikson, op. cit. p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Erikson, Gandhi’s Truth, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Group Psychology and The Analysis of the Ego, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Kris, Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art, New York, 1952, especially pp. 29–32, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ibid., p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Weber, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  36. C. L. Sanford, An American Pilgrim’s Progress, in: American Quarterly, vol. 6, 1954, pp. 297–310; cf. also Shea, op. cit., p. 293, and R. Sayre, The Examined Self, Princeton, N. J., 1964, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weber, op. cit., p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shea, op. cit., p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  39. B. J. Mandel, Bunyan and the Autobiographer’s Art, in: Criticism, vol. 10, 1968, p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. D. Lerner, Puritanism and the Spiritual Autobiography, in: Hibbert Journal, vol. 55, 1956–57, pp. 373–86.

    Google Scholar 

  41. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, New York, 1940, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ibid., p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kohut, 1972, op. cit., pp. 397–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ransohoff, P. (1976). A Psychological Approach to Religious Autobiography. In: Dux, G., Luckmann, T. (eds) Contributions to the Sociology of Knowledge / Contributions to the Sociology of Religion. Internationales Jahrbuch für Wissens- und Religionssoziologie / International Yearbook for Sociology of Knowledge and Religion, vol 10. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14483-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14483-0_4

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11355-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-14483-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics