Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strukturierung von Interviews

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jobinterviews professionell führen

  • 10k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Standardisierung und Strukturierung der Befragungs- und Auswertungsprozedur eines Interviews ist der maßgebliche Treiber für dessen eignungsdiagnostische Qualität. Im Kapitel werden 18 Möglichkeiten zur Strukturierung von Interviews beleuchtet und anhand von aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A. (2014). How to Develop Interview Questions and Anchored Rating Scales. Honolulu: SIOP, 29th Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., & Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2003). Situational and patterned behavior description interviews: comparison of their validity, correlates, and perceived fairness. Human Performance, 16, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2003). Situational and patterned behavior description interviews: comparison of their validity, correlates, and perceived fairness. Human Performance, 16, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoevemeyer, V. A.. (2006). High-impact interview questions: 701 behavior-based questions to find the right person for every job. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Wonderlic, E. F. (1939). Prediction of industrial success from a standardized interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2013). Employment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structure and format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2014). Moving forward indirectly: Reanalyzing the validity of employment interviews with indirect range restriction methodology. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, J. W. (1994). Hunter & Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2006). DIN SCREEN: Leitfaden zur Kontrolle und Optimierung der Qualität von Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei beruflichen Eignungsbeurteilungen. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, G. A., & Raatz, U. (1994) Testaufbau und Testanalyse. 5., völlig neubearb. und erw. Aufl.Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & De Paepe, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of interviewer-related factors that discourage the use of high structure interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & Sanchez, J. I. (2007). Can training improve the quality of inferences made by raters in competency modeling? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorf, C. H., & Macan, T. (2002). Note-taking in the employment interview: Effects on recall and judgements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, J., Seaton, P., & Chaboyer, W. (2008). Critical incident technique: A user’s guide for nurse researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. V., & Conway, R. N. (1999). Results-oriented interviewing: Principles, practices, and procedures. Needham Hights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2002) Developing Management Skills. 5th edition.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., Mazurkiewicz, M. D., & Heggestad, E. D. (2009). Using web-based frame-of-reference training to decrease biases in personality-based job analysis: An experimental field study. ­Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., Mazurkiewicz, M. D., & Heggestad, E. D. (2009). Using web-based frame-of-reference training to decrease biases in personality-based job analysis: An experimental field study. ­Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Peneno, G. M. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13 (4), 485–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Klehe, U. (2004). The impact of job complexity and study design on situational and behavior description interview validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 262−273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, H. T., Goffin, R. D., McCarthy, J. M., Rothstein, M., & Johnston, N. (2006). Comparing the validity of structured interviews for managerial level employees: Should we look to the past, or focus on the future? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J. L., & Taylor, P. J. (2003). Past Experience Versus Situational Employment: Interview Questions in a New Zealand Social Service Agency. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41, 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, M.C., & Muchinsky, P.M. (1993). The validity of the employment interview: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klehe, U.-C., König, C. J., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K. G. (2008). Transparency in structured interviews: Consequences for construct and criterion-related validity. Human ­Performance, 21, 107–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J., Solamon, J. M., & Lippstreu M. (2008). How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Herbst, K., Hardin, D. P., & Dardis, G. J. (2002). Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 592–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brtek, M.D., & Motowidlo, S.J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, S. D. (2002). A practitioner-based analysis of interviewer job expertise and scale format as contextual factors in situational interviews. Personnel Psychology, 55, 307−327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J., & Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational versus past-behaviour employment interview questions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, N. P., Bocketti, S. P., Maser, S. A., & Wennet, C. L. (2006). Benchmarks affect perceptions of prior disability in a structured interview. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (4), 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obermann Consulting GmbH, Köln, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Christof Obermann

  2. Obermann Consulting GmbH, Köln, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Marc Solga

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Christof Obermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Marc Solga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obermann, C., Solga, M. (2018). Strukturierung von Interviews. In: Jobinterviews professionell führen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18714-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18714-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18713-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18714-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation