Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((3118))

  • 348 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In der Wissensrepräsentation ist die Modellierung von epistemischen und doxastischen Propositionen, von Wissen und Überzeugungen (engl. beliefs) einer der Forschungsschwerpunkte. Ein Grund dafür liegt in den prinzipiellen Zielen der Künstlichen Intelligenz: Die Fähigkeit eines Systems, sein eigenes Wissen zu reflektieren, die Informationen anderer Systeme zu berücksichtigen und das Wissen und die Absichten menschlicher Benutzer in sein „Denken“ einzubeziehen, ist eine notwendige Bedingung für intelligentes Verhalten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Borgida, A., Brachman, R. J., McGuinness, D. L., Resnick, L. A. CLASSIC: A Structural Data Model for Objects. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 59–67, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halpern, J. Y. and Moses, Y. A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and Belief. Artificial Intelligence, 54 (3): 319–380, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Konolige, K. A First-Order Formalization of Knowledge and Action for Multi-Agent Planning System. Machine Intelligence, 10, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moore, R. Reasoning about Knowledge and Action. Tech. Note 191, SRI International, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, R. Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 25: 75–94, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Levesque, H. J. Foundations of a Functional Approach to Knowledge Representation. Artificial Intelligence, 23: 155–212, 1984.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lifschitz, V. Nonmonotonic Databases and Epistemic Queries. In Proc. of the 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI-91, Sidney, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, R. On Asking What a Database Knows. In Lloyd, J. W., editor, Symposium on computational logics, pages 96–113. Springer-Verlag, ESPRIT Basic Research Action Series, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bürckert, HJ., Nutt, W. (1993). Modellierung epistemischer Propositionen. In: Herzog, O., Christaller, T., Schütt, D. (eds) Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Künstlichen Intelligenz. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78545-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78545-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57278-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78545-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics