Abstract
This article looks at car-following models from a deliberately pragmatic perspective: What information about driver behavior can be extracted from a given data set without more or less speculative assumptions about underlying behavioral laws? The objective of this exercise is not to invalidate existing models but to obtain a better understanding of how much (complex) model structure can be revealed/validated from real data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
E. Brockfeld, R. D. Kühne, and P. Wagner. Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transportation Research Records, 1876:62–70, 2004.
G. S. Gurusinghe, T. Nakatsuji, Y. Azuta, P. Ranjitkar, and Y. Tanaboriboon. Multiple car following data using real time kinematic global positioning system. Transportation Research Records, 2003.
T. Söderström and P. Stoica. Instrumental variable methods for system identification. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 21(1):1–9, 2002.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the data-set, which has been made available to us by Prof. T Nakatsuji.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Flötteröd, G., Wagner, P., Flötteröd, YP. (2013). Identifiability and Practical Relevance of Complex Car-Following Models. In: Kozlov, V., Buslaev, A., Bugaev, A., Yashina, M., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow '11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39669-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39669-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39668-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39669-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)