Abstract
The debate about health care rationing, in terms of both its justification and mechanism, is conducted largely in the absence of data. The relevant literature mainly consists of assertion, exploration of ethical principles and political analysis. In particular, an epidemiological basis for the assumption that demand for effective treatments will invariably exceed supply is lacking. Waiting list figures suggest that health services are not satisfying demand in particular areas, but this does not mean that demand is generally insatiable. Total hip and knee replacements are effective interventions for patients with severe joint disease, resulting in large improvements in patient-related outcome measures for the majority of those undergoing these procedures. Although the number of operations performed in England has been rising each year over the last two decades [1], it has been suggested that there is still a large unmet need. However, the current evidence base is limited. Some prevalence data on severe joint disease in the community are available [2], but incidence data to estimate the annual population requirement for hip and knee replacement are lacking. Consensus criteria for case selection for total joint replacement (TJR) have been published [3, 4], but data on the impact of these criteria on annual rates are unavailable, and the implications of different thresholds for surgery, patient preference and other modifiers of the decision to recommend surgery are unclear.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hospital episode statistics 1997. London: Department of Health, 1998
Tennant A, Fear J, Pickering A, Hillman M, Cutts A, Chamberlain MA. Prevalence of knee problems in the population aged 55 years and over: identifying the need for knee arthroplasty. BMJ 1995; 310:1291–1293
Taylor CD, Williams JI. Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. Qual Health Care 1996; 5:20–30
Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. BMJ 1997; 314:131–134
Eachus J, Williams M, Chan P, Smith GD, Grainge M, Donovan J, Frankel S. Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of health. BMJ 1996; 312:287–292
Jüni P, Dieppe P, Donovan J, Peters T, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Frankel S. Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology 2003; 42:516–521
Frankel S, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Chan P, Peters TJ, Donovan J, Smith GD, Dieppe P. Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 1999; 353:1304–1309
Peters TJ, Eachus JI. Achieving equal probability of selection under various random sampling strategies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1995; 9:219–224
Anderson JJ, Felson DT. Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I). Evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:179–189
Hadorn DC, Holmes A. The New Zealand Priority Criteria Project. Criteria Pilot Tests. Available at:http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7074/131/DC1. Accessed December 12, 2001
Leske MC, Ederer F, Podgor M. Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence in glaucoma. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 113:606–613
Williams B, Whatmough P, McGill J, Rushton L. Private funding of elective hospital treatment in England and Wales, 1997–1998: national survey. BMJ 2000; 320:904–905
Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65:85–89
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1:95–108
Dieppe P, Basler HD, Chard J, Croft P, Dixon J, Hurley M, Lohmander S, Raspe H. Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999; 38:73–83
National hospital discharge survey 1997. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998
Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, Berdah L, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, Vignon E. Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55:356–362
Acknowledgements
We thank all study participants and the partners and staff of participating general practices for their support and interest in the study. We are indebted to the whole of the SASH research team: Kirsty Alchin, Ros Berkeley-Hill, Jane Brooks, Hilary Brownett, Phil Chan, Clare Cross, Catherine Dawe, Cathy Doel, Jenny Eachus, Helen Forward, Matthew Grainge, Rosemary Greenwood, Fiona Hollyman, Sue Jones, Helen Moore, Kate Morris, Nicky Pearson, Brian Quilty, Chris Smith, Lynne Smith, Gwyn Williams, Mark Williams, Sue Williams, and Andrea Wilson; and Allan Douglas and Doreen Cook at Dillon Computing. Finally, we are grateful to our co-investigators, Jenny Donovan, Tim Peters and Stephen Frankel, and to Brian Williams for providing unpublished data. The SASH was originally funded by the Department of Health and the South and West NHS Research and Development Directorate. This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants no. 3233-066377 and 3200-066378). The Department of Social Medicine is the lead centre for the MRC Health Services Research Collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 EFORT
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jüni, P., Dieppe, P. (2009). Population Requirements for Primary Hip-Replacement Surgery in England. In: Puhl, W., Günther, KP., Dieppe, P., Dreinhöfer, K.E. (eds) EUROHIP. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74137-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74137-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74133-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74137-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)