Skip to main content

Autonomy and Agent Deliberation

  • Conference paper
Agents and Computational Autonomy (AUTONOMY 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2969))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An important aspect of agent autonomy is the decision making capability of the agents. We discuss several issues that agents need to deliberate about in order to decide which action to perform. We assume that there is no unique (rational or universal) deliberation process and that the deliberation process can be specified in various ways. The deliberation process is investigated from two perspectives. From the agent specification point of view the deliberation process can be specified by dynamic properties such as commitment strategies, and from the agent programming point of view the deliberation process should be implemented through the deliberation cycle of the agent, which can be either fixed or determined by a deliberation programming language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boutilier, C.: Towards a logic for qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1994), pp. 75–86. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.: Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broersen, J., Dastani, M.M., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: Trust and commitment in dynamic logic. In: Shafazand, H., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) EurAsia-ICT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2510, pp. 677–684. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence Journal 42(3), 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dastani, M., de Boer, F., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.: Programming agent deliberation: An approach illustrated using the 3apl language. In: Proceedings of The Second Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dastani, M., Huang, Z., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: BDI and QDT. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT 2001), Stanford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doyle, J., Thomason, R.: Background to qualitative decision theory. AI magazine 20(2), 55–68 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hindriks, K.V., Boer, F.S.D., der Hoek, W.V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Agent programming in 3apl. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(4), 357–401 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffrey, R.C.: The Logic of Decision. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kinny, D.: Fundamentals of Agent Computation: Theory and Semantics, Australia (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, J.-J., van der Hoek, W., van Linder, B.: A logical approach to the dynamics of commitments. Artificial Intelligence 113(1–2), 1–41 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearl, J.: From conditional ought to qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1993), pp. 12–20. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Deliberation and its role in the formation of intentions. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1991), pp. 300–307. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi architecture. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and computation 8, 293–342 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Savage, L.: The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dastani, M., Dignum, F., Meyer, JJ. (2004). Autonomy and Agent Deliberation. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds) Agents and Computational Autonomy. AUTONOMY 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22477-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25928-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics