Skip to main content

Lexikalische Pragmatik

  • Chapter
Handbuch Pragmatik
  • 13k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Es gibt eine Fülle von Beispielen, die verdeutlichen, dass Wortbedeutungen stark vom Kontext beeinflusst sind, wobei zunächst offenbleiben soll, was alles unter die Domäne des Kontexts fällt. Ein Beispiel ist das deutsche Adjektiv ›scharf‹, das in den Ausdrücken scharfes Messer, scharfer Geruch, scharfes Argument offensichtlich ganz unterschiedliche Beiträge zum Bedeutungsganzen fügt. Selbst bei Adjektiven, die gemeinhin als ›absolut‹ gelten, findet man diese Kontextabhängigkeit (vgl. Partee 2010). Man vergleiche etwa die Bedeutung der Ausdrücke rote Nase, rote Fahne und rote Bohnen. Renate Bartsch hat sich um die formale Analyse derartiger Phänomene besonders verdient gemacht (vgl. Bartsch 1987).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bartsch, Renate (1987): Context-dependent interpretations of lexical items. In: Renate Bartsch/Johan van Benthem/Peter van Emde-Boas (Hg.): Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (1998): Lexical pragmatics. In: Journal of Semantics 15, 115–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (2002): Lexical semantics and pragmatics. In: Linguistische Berichte 10, 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (2006): Embedded implicatures and optimality theoretic pragmatics. In: Torgim Solstad/Atle Grønn/Dag Haug (Hg.): A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø: In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Celebration of his 50th Birthday. Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (2007): Optimality theoretic pragmatics and the explicature/implicature distinction. In: Noel Burton-Roberts (Hg.): Pragmatics. Basingstoke, 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (2010): Some experimental aspects of optimality-theoretic pragmatics. In: Eniko T. Nemeth/Karoly Bibok (Hg.): The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard/Zeevat, Henk (Hg.) (2004): Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard/de Hoop, Helen/Hendriks, Petra (2005): Optimal Communication. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard/Hendriks, Petra/de Hoop, Helen (2003): A new hypothesis on compositionality. In: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Cognitive Science, Sydney, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard/Jäger, Gerhard (1999): Competition and Interpretation: The German Adverbs of Repetition. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard/Leßmöllmann, Annette/van der Sandt, Rob (1996): Conversational implicature and lexical pragmatics. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Conversational Implicature, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, Robyn (2002): Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter (Hg.) (1981): Radical Pragmatics. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Mary/Kanazawa, Makoto/Kim, Yookyung/Mchombo, Sam/Peters, Stanley (1998): Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, Merel L. (2013): Two computational methods of attributive modification in natural language semantics compared. Universiteit van Amsterdam Bachelor Thesis. In: https://esc.fnwi.uva.nl/thesis/centraal/files/f218739155.pdf.

  • Ducrot, Oswald (1980): Les Echelles Argumentatives. Paris. Fodor, Jerry A./Pylyshyn, Zenon W. (1988): Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In: Cognition, 28(1–2), 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Paul (1989): Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David (1979): On the logic of demonstratives. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahav, Ron (1993): The combinatorial-connectionist debate and the pragmatics of adjectives. In: Pragmatics and Cognition 1, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen (2000): Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James D. (1978): Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In: Peter Cole (Hg.): Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York, 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, Claire F./Carello, Claudia (1981): Direct Perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, Ruth G. (1984): Language, Thought, and other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Jeff/Lapata, Mirella (2010): Composition in distributional models of semantics. In: Cognitive Science 34, 388–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, Geoffrey (1979): The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 143–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara (2010): Privative adjectives: subsective plus coercion. Presuppositions and discourse. In: Rainer Bäuerle/Uwe Reyle/Thomas Ede Zimmermann (Hg.): Essays Offered to Hans Kamp. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, William (1960): Word and Object. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François (1993): Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François (2004): Literal Meanings. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François (2006): Truth-conditional pragmatics: An overview. In: Paolo Bouquet/Luciana Serafini/Rich Thomason (Hg.): Perspectives on Contexts. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, Paul/Legendre, Géraldine (2006): The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spenader, Jennifer/Blutner, Reinhard (2007): Compositionality and systematicity. In: Gerolf Bouma/Irene Krämer/Joost Zwarts (Hg.): Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan/Wilson, Deirdre (1995): Relevance. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, Eve (1990): From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warglien, Massimo/Gärdenfors, Peter (2013): Semantics, conceptual spaces, and the meeting of minds. In: Synthese 190, 2165–2193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Deidre (2003): Relevance and lexical pragmatics. In: Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Yosd (2001): Plural predication and the strongest meaning hypothesis. In: Journal of Semantics 18, 333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Thomas Ede (1991): Kontextabhängigkeit. In: Arnim von Stechow/Dieter Wunderlich (Hg.): Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung. Berlin, 151–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, George K. (1949): Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blutner, R. (2018). Lexikalische Pragmatik. In: Liedtke, F., Tuchen, A. (eds) Handbuch Pragmatik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_10

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04624-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics