Abstract
Romania has undergone a radical, yet troubled transition to democracy in the last 20 years. Successive post-1989 governments have drawn on a notion of collective memory that reflected both progressive arguments for change and facing the past and conservative arguments of putting the past to rest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In January 2006, the Council of Europe passed a resolution condemning the crimes committed by communist regimes and in January 2007, Romania was finally granted membership of the European Union.
- 2.
Some commentators have argued that Băsescu’s choice of Tismăneanu as President of the commission was solely motivated by his national and international academic and public reputation; others have expressed suspicions as to Băsescu’s genuine political motives and were more inclined to discuss Băsescu’s decision in terms of his ‘real’ political motives: settling scores with coalition partners and political opposition.
- 3.
It was, nonetheless, the first systematic attempt to forge a collective representation of history that tried to engage with (and at the same time, create) emerging collective representations, around issues such as ‘condemnation’, ‘retributive justice’, and so on.
References
Assmann, J. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, 65(Spring–Summer), 125–133.
Baker, C. (2000). Locating Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation in Texts and Talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
Barthélémy, M. (2003). Temporal Perspectives in the Practical-Textual Handling of a European Public Problem. Social Science Information, 42, 403–430.
Berard, T. (2005). On multiple Identities and Educational Contexts: Remarks on the Study of Inequalities and Discrimination. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4, 67–76.
Billig, M. (1998). Talking of the Royal family. London: Routledge.
Bruner, J. (2005). Past and Present as Narrative Constructions. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 23–43). New York: Bergham Books.
Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222.
Cesereanu, R. (2008). The Final Report on the Holocaust and the Final Report on the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22, 270–228.
Chua, B. (1979a). Democracy as Textual Accomplishment. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 541–549.
Chua, B. (1979b). Describing a National Crisis: An Exploration in Textual Analysis. Human Studies, 2, 47–61.
Ciobanu, M. (2009). Criminalising the Past and Reconstructing Collective Memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 313–336.
Cohen, S. (2001). States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cohen, S. (2006). History Out of Joint: Essays on the Use and Abuse of History. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and Collectivity: Diversity, History and the Rhetorical Construction of National Entitativity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 657–682.
Connolly, W. (1993). The Terms of Political Discourse (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Coulter, J. (2001). Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.
de Certeau, M. (1986). Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dragusin, N. (2007). Raportul Tismaneanu. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 3–6.
Drew, P. (2006). When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods (pp. 63–80). London: Sage.
Dunmire, P. (2005). Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 16, 481–513.
Edelman, M. (2001). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Frow, J. (2001). A Politics of Stolen Time. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace: Geographies of Temporality (pp. 73–88). London: Routledge.
Gergen, K. (2005). Narrative, Moral Identity and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 99–119). New York: Bergham Books.
Green, B. (1983). Knowing the Poor: A Case-Study in Textual Reality Construction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Habermas, J. (1988). Concerning the Public Use of History. New German Critique, 44, 40–50.
Habermas, J., & Michnik, A. (1994). Overcoming the Past. New Left Review, I/203, 3–16.
Halbwachs, M. (1952/1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). The Reflexive Constitution of Category, Predicate and Context in Two Settings. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis (pp. 25–48). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Hilton, D. J., Erb, H. P., Dermot, M., & Molian, D. J. (1996). Social Representations of History and Attitudes to European Unification in Britain, France and Germany. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European Identities: Advances in Social Psychology (pp. 275–296). Oxford: Buttherworth Heinemann.
Hodge, B., & McHoul, A. (1992). The Politics of Text and Commentary. Textual Practice, 6, 189–209.
Hogea, A. (2010). Coming to Terms with the Communist Past in Romania: An Analysis of the Political and Media Discourse Concerning the Tismăneanu Report. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2(1), 16–30.
Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ibañez, T. (1994). Constructing a Representation or Representing a Construction? Theory & Psychology, 4, 363–381.
Jayyusi, L. (1991a). Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 227–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jayyusi, L. (1991b). The Equivocal Text and the Objective World. Continuum, 5, 166–190.
Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the Past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.
Luczynski, J. (1997). The Multivoicedness of Historical Representations in a Changing Sociocultural Context: Young Polish Adults’ Representations of World War II. Culture & Psychology, 3(1), 21–40.
Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: Sage.
Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2007). Issues in the Socio-Cultural Study of Memory: Making Memory Matter. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 661–677). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murakami, K. (2007). Positioning in Accounting for Redemption and Reconciliation. Culture & Psychology, 13, 431–452.
Pennebaker, J., & Banasik, B. (1997). On the Creation and Maintenance of Collective Memories: History as Social Psychology. In J. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 3–20). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to Critical Humanism. London: Sage.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimating Claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Poole, R. (2008). Memory, History and the Claims of the Past. Memory Studies, 1, 149–166.
Prior, L. (1997). Following on Foucault’s Footsteps: Text and Context in Qualitative Research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 63–79). London: Sage.
Santiso, J. (1998). The Fall into the Present: The Emergence of Limited Political Temporalities in Latin America. Time & Society, 7, 25–54.
Sibley, C., Liu, J., Duckitt, J., & Khan, S. (2008). Social Representations of History and the Legitimation of Social Inequality: The Form and Function of Historical Negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 542–565.
Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.
Stan, L. (2007). Comisia Tismăneanu: repere internaţionale. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 7–13.
Stan, L. (Ed.). (2009). Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.
Straub, J. (2005). Telling Stories, Making History: Toward a Narrative Psychology of the Historical Construction of Meaning. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 44–98). New York: Bergham Books.
Taylor, S., & Wetherell, M. (1999). A Suitable Time and Place: Speakers’ Use of ‘Time’ to do Discursive Work in Narratives of National and Personal Life. Time & Society, 8, 39–58.
Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tileagă, C., & Byford, J. (Eds.). (2014). Psychology and History: Interdisciplinary Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tismăneanu, V. (1998). Fantasies of Salvation: Democracy, Nationalism, and Myth in Postcommunist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tismăneanu, V. (2007a). Confronting Romania’s Past: A Response to Charles King. Slavic Review, 66(Winter).
Tismăneanu, V. (2007b). Refuzul de A Uita: Articole şi Comentarii Politice (2006–2007). Iasi: Curtea Veche.
Tismăneanu, V. (2008). Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(1), 166–180.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society, 6, 81–106.
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Time in Discourse. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1, 127–145.
Watson, R. (1997). Ethnomethodology and Textual Analysis. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 80–98). London: Sage.
Watson, R. (2009). Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9, 475–499.
Wertsch, J. (1997). Narrative Tools of History and Identity. Culture & Psychology, 3, 5–20.
Wertsch, J. (2007). Collective Memory. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 645–660). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tileagă, C. (2018). Communism as Moral Problem. In: Representing Communism After the Fall. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97394-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97394-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97393-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97394-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)