Skip to main content

Communism as Moral Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Representing Communism After the Fall

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology ((PSDP))

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

Romania has undergone a radical, yet troubled transition to democracy in the last 20 years. Successive post-1989 governments have drawn on a notion of collective memory that reflected both progressive arguments for change and facing the past and conservative arguments of putting the past to rest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In January 2006, the Council of Europe passed a resolution condemning the crimes committed by communist regimes and in January 2007, Romania was finally granted membership of the European Union.

  2. 2.

    Some commentators have argued that Băsescu’s choice of Tismăneanu as President of the commission was solely motivated by his national and international academic and public reputation; others have expressed suspicions as to Băsescu’s genuine political motives and were more inclined to discuss Băsescu’s decision in terms of his ‘real’ political motives: settling scores with coalition partners and political opposition.

  3. 3.

    It was, nonetheless, the first systematic attempt to forge a collective representation of history that tried to engage with (and at the same time, create) emerging collective representations, around issues such as ‘condemnation’, ‘retributive justice’, and so on.

References

  • Assmann, J. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, 65(Spring–Summer), 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. (2000). Locating Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation in Texts and Talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy, M. (2003). Temporal Perspectives in the Practical-Textual Handling of a European Public Problem. Social Science Information, 42, 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berard, T. (2005). On multiple Identities and Educational Contexts: Remarks on the Study of Inequalities and Discrimination. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1998). Talking of the Royal family. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (2005). Past and Present as Narrative Constructions. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 23–43). New York: Bergham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesereanu, R. (2008). The Final Report on the Holocaust and the Final Report on the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22, 270–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. (1979a). Democracy as Textual Accomplishment. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. (1979b). Describing a National Crisis: An Exploration in Textual Analysis. Human Studies, 2, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciobanu, M. (2009). Criminalising the Past and Reconstructing Collective Memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2001). States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2006). History Out of Joint: Essays on the Use and Abuse of History. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and Collectivity: Diversity, History and the Rhetorical Construction of National Entitativity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 657–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (1993). The Terms of Political Discourse (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (2001). Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1986). Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragusin, N. (2007). Raportul Tismaneanu. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. (2006). When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods (pp. 63–80). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunmire, P. (2005). Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 16, 481–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (2001). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frow, J. (2001). A Politics of Stolen Time. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace: Geographies of Temporality (pp. 73–88). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2005). Narrative, Moral Identity and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 99–119). New York: Bergham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (1983). Knowing the Poor: A Case-Study in Textual Reality Construction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Concerning the Public Use of History. New German Critique, 44, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Michnik, A. (1994). Overcoming the Past. New Left Review, I/203, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1952/1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). The Reflexive Constitution of Category, Predicate and Context in Two Settings. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis (pp. 25–48). Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., Erb, H. P., Dermot, M., & Molian, D. J. (1996). Social Representations of History and Attitudes to European Unification in Britain, France and Germany. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European Identities: Advances in Social Psychology (pp. 275–296). Oxford: Buttherworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, B., & McHoul, A. (1992). The Politics of Text and Commentary. Textual Practice, 6, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogea, A. (2010). Coming to Terms with the Communist Past in Romania: An Analysis of the Political and Media Discourse Concerning the Tismăneanu Report. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez, T. (1994). Constructing a Representation or Representing a Construction? Theory & Psychology, 4, 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1991a). Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 227–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1991b). The Equivocal Text and the Objective World. Continuum, 5, 166–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the Past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luczynski, J. (1997). The Multivoicedness of Historical Representations in a Changing Sociocultural Context: Young Polish Adults’ Representations of World War II. Culture & Psychology, 3(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2007). Issues in the Socio-Cultural Study of Memory: Making Memory Matter. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 661–677). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, K. (2007). Positioning in Accounting for Redemption and Reconciliation. Culture & Psychology, 13, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J., & Banasik, B. (1997). On the Creation and Maintenance of Collective Memories: History as Social Psychology. In J. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 3–20). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to Critical Humanism. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimating Claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, R. (2008). Memory, History and the Claims of the Past. Memory Studies, 1, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. (1997). Following on Foucault’s Footsteps: Text and Context in Qualitative Research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 63–79). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiso, J. (1998). The Fall into the Present: The Emergence of Limited Political Temporalities in Latin America. Time & Society, 7, 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C., Liu, J., Duckitt, J., & Khan, S. (2008). Social Representations of History and the Legitimation of Social Inequality: The Form and Function of Historical Negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 542–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L. (2007). Comisia Tismăneanu: repere internaţionale. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L. (Ed.). (2009). Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. (2005). Telling Stories, Making History: Toward a Narrative Psychology of the Historical Construction of Meaning. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 44–98). New York: Bergham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Wetherell, M. (1999). A Suitable Time and Place: Speakers’ Use of ‘Time’ to do Discursive Work in Narratives of National and Personal Life. Time & Society, 8, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tileagă, C., & Byford, J. (Eds.). (2014). Psychology and History: Interdisciplinary Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tismăneanu, V. (1998). Fantasies of Salvation: Democracy, Nationalism, and Myth in Postcommunist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tismăneanu, V. (2007a). Confronting Romania’s Past: A Response to Charles King. Slavic Review, 66(Winter).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tismăneanu, V. (2007b). Refuzul de A Uita: Articole şi Comentarii Politice (2006–2007). Iasi: Curtea Veche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tismăneanu, V. (2008). Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(1), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society, 6, 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Time in Discourse. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1, 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. (1997). Ethnomethodology and Textual Analysis. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 80–98). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. (2009). Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9, 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1997). Narrative Tools of History and Identity. Culture & Psychology, 3, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (2007). Collective Memory. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 645–660). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tileagă, C. (2018). Communism as Moral Problem. In: Representing Communism After the Fall. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97394-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics