Skip to main content

Academic Writing in a Russian University Setting: Challenges and Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
University Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, Transition, and Innovation

Part of the book series: Multilingual Education ((MULT,volume 29))

Abstract

Competence in academic writing among university undergraduates has been a key area of research for over the last 30 years. However, the dominant status of English as the lingua franca of the global academic community has led to substantial changes in the academic language landscape of non-Anglophone countries. In particular, local traditions and practices of L1 academic writing within a university context tend to be under-supported while L2 (English) academic writing experience is treated as a top teaching priority.

The present study, carried out with the help of the LIDHUM project team, reports results on the current role of academic writing in L1 vs. L2 in Russia. A questionnaire was developed for first- and third-year undergraduates of a leading national research university to answer such questions as: whether academic writing plays an important role in the university, whether L1 writing is supported, which L1 and L2 written genres students use, how much time students spend on classroom-based vs. home-based writing, whether written tasks require critical thinking competence, whether academic writing is supported, and how writing skills are developed.

The chapter focuses on L1/L2 similarities and differences as well as on first-year undergraduates’ (i.e., entry-level) writing competence vs. third-year students’ perceptions of writing skills. The study likewise reflects on developmental needs, which are also relevant for the European context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In E. Cushman, E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 511–524). Boston: Bedford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzell, P. (1982). College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry, 12, 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 83–104). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chitez, M., & Kruse, O. (2012). Writing cultures and genres in European higher education. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing series (Vol. 24, pp. 151–175). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. Retrieved 2014, July 1 from: http://wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf

  • Delcambre, I., & Donahue, C. (2012). Academic writing activity: Student writing in transition. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Studies in writing series (Vol. 24, pp. 129–149). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enhancing academic literacy in the first year: A quality enhancement plan for Gordon College. Retrieved from: https://www.gordonstate.edu/pdf/GC_QEP.pdf

  • Freire, P. (1989). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbord, J. (2010). Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Stakeholders and directions in initiating change. Across the Disciplines, 7. Retrieved 2014, July 1 from: http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/harbord2010.cfm

  • Korotkina, I. B. (2009). Gramotnost’ v vek informatsionnykh technologiy: V poiskah kontseptual’nogo edinstva // Obrazovaniye i obshchestvo, 4. Retrieved 2014, July 1 from: http://www.jeducation.ru/4_2009/125.html (in Russian).

  • Kruse, O. (2013). Perspectives on academic writing in European higher education: Genres, practices, and competences. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, S. (1987). Defining writing across curriculum. WPA: Writing program administration, 11(1–2), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, N. (2010). Conceptualizing in English language needs of first year university students. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education., 1(1), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Lea, M., Parker, J., Stree, B., & Donahue, T. (2009). Exploring notions of genre in “academic literacies” and “writing across the curriculum”: Approaches across countries and contexts. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 395–423). Fort Collins: WAC Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shchemeleva, I., & Smirnova, N. (2014). Akademicheskoye pis’mo v vuze: keys analiz NRU HSE. In I. Shchemeleva (Ed.), Homo Loquens: Aktual’niye voprosy lingvistiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannyh yazykov. Vypusk 6 (pp. 268–279). St. Petersburg: Asteriks (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova, N., & Shchemeleva, I. (2015). Rol’ pis’ma v sovremennom universitete: Analiz zarubezhnoy praktiki obucheniya academicheskomu pis’mu. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 9, Vol.2, pp.185-–197 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumeneva, Yu. A., Kuzmina, Yu. V. (2013). Chto dayot god obucheniya rossiyskomu shkol’niku. Na materialah PISA-2009: Gramotnost’ chteniya. Journal of Educational Studies, 1, 107–135 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P., Mason, L., & Lonka, K. (2001). Writing as a learning tool: An introduction. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.). P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 7. Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 7–22). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Shchemeleva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shchemeleva, I., Smirnova, N. (2018). Academic Writing in a Russian University Setting: Challenges and Perspectives. In: Chitez, M., Doroholschi, C., Kruse, O., Salski, Ł., Tucan, D. (eds) University Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, Transition, and Innovation. Multilingual Education, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95198-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95198-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95198-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics