Abstract
Although contemporary immigrant integration policies are increasingly geared towards fashioning “good” citizens out of migrant women in France and Finland the institutional socialization process performing this work evolves differently and with different inequality related outcomes in the two countries. However, differential national conceptions of women’s citizenship, as real as they may be, do not alone suffice to explain the observed differences. It is neither enough to explain the divergences by the attributes of individual street-level bureaucrats. A careful analysis the local institutional context and ordinary practices of integration is necessary for understanding why these policies (re)produce inequalities through different kind of boundary-work. The comparative case study shows that inequalities are produced more strongly along ethnic boundaries in France and through the contraction of the gender boundaries in Finland that participate in practice in defining the category of deserving citizens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The names of the informants have been changed and the neighbourhoods anonymized for research ethical reasons.
- 2.
Interview with Samina, 30.3.2012.
- 3.
Interview with Samina, 30.3.2012.
- 4.
Idem.
- 5.
Idem.
- 6.
Idem.
- 7.
Interview with Leena, 5.3.2014.
- 8.
Idem.
- 9.
Idem.
- 10.
Interview with Pirkko, 3.4.2014.
- 11.
Interview with Samina, 30.3.2012.
- 12.
Interview with Leena, 5.3.2014.
- 13.
Interview with Pascal, 27.11.2013.
- 14.
Fieldnotes, 14.9.2011.
- 15.
Fieldnotes, 9.11.2013.
- 16.
Fieldnotes, 28.9.2011.
- 17.
“Women and men reaching an agreement”
- 18.
Interview with Leena 5.3.2014.
- 19.
Ibidem.
- 20.
Interview with Seija, 13.3.2014.
- 21.
Ibidem.
- 22.
A comparison of the 1997 report Maahanmuuttajanaiset Suomessa (Immigrant Women in Finland) issued by the Ministry of Work and the 2012 State’s Integration Programme by the Ministry of Employment and Economy makes evident the neglect of a plurality of situations migrant women live in in the 2012 report.
- 23.
The Neighbourhood House’s information bulletin, autumn 2013.
- 24.
Implanted in a residential area with a concentration of social housing and a large migrant population, it previously functioned as a Residents’ House with two municipal social workers mandated to support the local residents’ self-organized activities. In the early 2000’s, the unit was transferred under the Helsinki City department of early childhood education and its activities have since increasingly targeted families with small children.
- 25.
Femmes de l’immigration: assurer le plein exercice de la citoyenneté, à part entière, à parts égales. 2005. Paris: Ministère de la parité et de l’égalité professionnelle, Ministère de la justice Paris. 6. The document notably identifies migrants of African origin as typical victims of oppressive practices like forced marriage, polygamy and gender mutilation.
References
Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.
Amiraux, V., & Simon, P. (2006). There are no minorities here: Cultures of scholarship and public debate on immigrants and integration in France. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 47(3–4), 191–215.
Anderson, E. (2011). The cosmopolitan canopy: Race and civility in everyday life. New York: W. W. Norton.
Anttonen, A. (1998). Vocabularies of citizenship and gender: Finland. Critical Social Policy, 18(56), 355–373.
Anttonen, A., & Henriksson, L. (1994). Naisten hyvinvointivaltio. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Borevi, K. (2012). Sweden: The flagship of multiculturalism. In G. Brochmann & A. Hagelund (Eds.), Immigration policy and the scandinavian welfare state 1945–2010 (pp. 25–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bresson, M. (2006). La Psychologisation de l’intervention sociale: mythes et réalités. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Brubaker, R. (1998). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.
Bruun, M., Skraederdaal Jakobsen, G., & Krøijer, K. (2011). Introduction. The concern for sociality—Practicing equality and hierarchy in Denmark. Social Analysis, 55(2), 1–19.
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 42, 1241–1299.
Dubois, V. (2009). Towards a critical policy ethnography. Critical Policy Studies, 3(2), 219–237.
Dubois, V. (2010). The bureaucrat and the poor. Farnham: Ashgate.
Duyvendak, J. W., & Bertossi, C. (2009). Modèles d’intégration et intégration des modèles. Migrations Société, 21(122), 26–34.
Fassin, E. (2006). La démocratie sexuelle et le conflit des civilisations. Multitudes, 26, 123–131.
Fassin, D., & Mazouz, S. (2009). What is it to become French? Naturalization as a republican rite of institution. Revue Française de Sociologie, 50(5), 37–64.
Favell, A. (1998). Philosophies of integration: Immigration and the idea of citizenship in France and Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave and MacMillan.
Fernando, M. (2013). Save the Muslim woman, save the republic: Ni Putes Ni Soumises and the ruse of neoliberal sovereignty. Modern & Contemporary France, 21(2), 147–165.
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Graham, M. (2002). Emotional bureaucracies: Emotions, civil servants, and immigrants in Swedish welfare state. Ethos, 30(3), 199–226.
Guénif Souilamas, N., & Macé, É. (2004). Les féministes et le garçon arabe. La Tour-d’Aigues: Éditions de l’Aube.
Guénif-Souilamas, N. (2003). Des Beurettes. Paris: Fayard.
Hachimi Alaoui, M. (2012). L’intégration sous condition : valeurs non négociables et égalité des sexes. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 24(1), 114–134.
Hajjat, A. (2012). Les frontières de l’identité nationale. L’injonction à l’assimilation en France métropolitaine et coloniale. Paris: La Découverte.
Haldrup, M., Koefoed, L., & Simonsen, K. (2006). Practical orientalism: Bodies, everyday life and the construction of otherness. Human Geography, 88(2), 173–184.
Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart, commercialization of human feeling. San Francisco/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Hvinden, B., & Johansson, H. (2007). Citizenship in Nordic welfare states – Dynamics of choice, duties and participation in a changing Europe. New York: Routledge.
Keskinen, S., Vuori, J., & Hirsiaho, A. (2009a). Monikulttuurisuuden sukupuoli. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Keskinen, S., Tuori, S., Irni, S., & Mulinari, D. (2009b). Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region. Farnham: Ashgate.
Kettunen, P. (2001). The Nordic welfare state in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of History, 26(3), 225–247.
Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2007). Minorities and mistrust: The cushioning impact of informal social contacts and political-institutional fairness. QoG Working Paper Series, 18, 1–33.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded ed, New York: Russell Sage Foundation,.
Lister, R., Williams, F., Anttonen, A., Bussemaker, J., Gerhard, U., Heinen, J., & Johansson, S. (2007). Gendering citizenship in Western Europe: New challenges for citizenship research in a cross-national context. Bristol: Polity Press.
Manier, M. (2010). Le traitement social de la question des « femmes de l’immigration » dans le champ de l’action sociale Les enjeux d’une catégorisation intersectionnelle – ethnique, de genre et de classe – et de ses effets sociaux. Thèse de sociologie, Nice: University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis.
Morgan, K. (2017). Gender, right-wing populism, and immigrant integration policies in France, 1989–2012. West European Politics, 40(4), 887–906.
Paugam, S. (2011). Repenser la solidarité. L’apport des sciences sociales. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Rajas, J. (2012). Assemblages of pastoral power and sameness. A governmentality of integrating immigrant women. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(1), 5–15.
Rastas, A., Huttunen, L., & Löytty, O. (2005). Suomalainen vieraskirja: Kuinka käsitellä monikulttuurisuutta. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Revillard, A. (2008). Quelles politiques pour quelles femmes ? Une comparaison France-Québec. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 15(4), 687–704.
Rosanvallon, P. (2004). Le modèle politique français: la société civile contre le jacobinisme de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil.
Saukkonen, P. (2013). Erilaisuuksien Suomi: Vähemmistö- ja kotouttamispolitiikan vaihtoehdot. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Siim, B. (2000). Gender and citizenship politics and agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spire, A. (2008). Accuellir ou reconduire : Enquête sur les guichets de l’immigration. Paris: Raisons d’agir.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.
Tuori, S. (2009). The politics of multicultural encounters: Feminist and postcolonial perspectives. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.
Työ-ja elinkeinoministeriö (Ministry of Employment and Economy). (2012). Valtion kotouttamisohjelma. (The State’s Integration Programme), Helsinki.
Työministeriö (Ministry of Work). (1997). Maahanmuuttajanaiset Suomessa (Immigrant Women in Finland), Helsinki.
Vuori, J., & Hirsiaho, A. (2012). Stories of alphabetisation, stories of everyday citizenship. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(3), 232–242.
Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haapajärvi, L. (2018). Conforming Women Citizens in the Making. Targeting Migrants Through Gendered Immigrant Integration Policies in Helsinki and Paris. In: Barrault-Stella, L., Weill, PE. (eds) Creating Target Publics for Welfare Policies. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89596-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89596-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89595-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89596-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)