Skip to main content

The Status of Patent Medicines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Patent Medicines Industry in Georgian England

Part of the book series: Medicine and Biomedical Sciences in Modern History ((MBSMH))

Abstract

Patent medicines had a status of their own that was distinct from both orthodox medicine and irregular practice. Branded proprietary medicines became visible in the seventeenth century, and medicine patenting started in the early eighteenth century. Several strands of evidence indicate that sales were substantial, and all but the poorest purchased them, with the middling and upper members of society probably being the best customers. Most patent medicines were aimed at a limited range of problems, and choosing to take one was a rational decision. Some regular practitioners owned patent medicines, and others were sympathetic to their use, with the state providing an inadvertent official endorsement through the patenting system and the medicine excise stamp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Archives

  • Cumbria Archives, Whitehaven, Day Books of John Ware, DA 276A.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives, Kew, Will of Francis Spilsbury, Prob.11/1236/50.

    Google Scholar 

Newspapers and Journals

Printed Primary Sources

  • Adair, James, Essays on Fashionable Diseases (London: T. P. Bateman, 1790?).

    Google Scholar 

  • An Amateur, Real Life in London, 2 vols (London: Jones & Co., 1821).

    Google Scholar 

  • Book of English Trades (London: Rivington, 1821).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, William, Domestic Medicine, 6th edn (Edinburgh, 1779).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, William, Domestic Medicine, 14th edn (London, 1794).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byfield, Timothy, A Short but Full Account of the Rise, Nature and Management of Smallpox and Other Putrid Fevers (London, 1711).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Correspondence of the Reverend Joseph Greene: Parson, Schoolmaster and Antiquary 1712–1790 (London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning (London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, 1830).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denizen of Liverpool, ‘Samuel Solomon MD’, The Scourge, 2 (1811), 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, W, The Country Housewife’s Family Companion (London, 1750).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Duncan, ‘On the Origins and Progress of Empiricism’, MPJ, 14 (1805), 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, William, A New Enquiry into the Causes, Symptoms and Cure, of Putrid and Inflammatory Fevers (London: T. Cadell, 1773).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill, Samuel, ‘An Account of the Practice of one of the Physicians of the Westminster General Dispensary’, MPJ, 18 (1807), 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliard, Edward, The Use and Abuse of Antimonial Medicines (London: John Murray, 1773).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, John, Observations on the Duties and Offices of a Physician (London: Strahan & Cadell, 1770).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, John, Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician, new edn (London, 1772).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Papers (Accounts and Papers).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Sessional Papers for the Eighteenth Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietros, ‘Of Quacks and Empiricism’, MPJ, 13 (1805), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, George, Kearsley’s Tax Tables 1786 (London, 1786).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, George, Kearsley’s Table of Trades (London, 1787).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G, Kearsley’s Tax Tables 1808, (London, 1808).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws and Regulations of the Benevolent Medical Society … in the county of Kent (Canterbury, 1799).

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Diary for the year 1799 (London, 1798).

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicus, ‘Dr Brodum’s Intrigues with the College of Physicians’, The Scourge, 2 (1811), 491–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Messrs. May v. Doctors J & C Jordan’, Monthly Gazette of Health, 14 (1829), 522–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Register 1780–1796, vol. 28, Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, Thomas, Medical Ethics (Manchester: Russell, 1803).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Josiah, Truth in Opposition to Ignorant and Malicious Falsehood (London, 1701).

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, Robert, A Few Interesting Remarks on Bilious Disorders and Yellow Fever (Leeds: Thomas Gill, 1798).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, Thomas, The Oeconomy of Quackery Considered (London, 1777).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzzle-Pate, Peter, ‘Medical Science Exemplified’, The Scourge, 2 (1811), 260–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quack Doctors Dissected, (Gloucester, 1805?).

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulations of the Medical Society of London (London, 1775?).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, Francis, Free Thoughts on Quacks and Their Medicines (London, 1776).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, Francis, Discursory Thoughts, 2nd edn (London, 1785).

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Joseph, A Guide to Health (London, 1795).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Trial of Thomas Collicott’, 1812, Old Bailey Proceedings Online, www.oldbaileyonline.org (accessed 2 June 2017).

  • Wesley, John, Primitive Physic, 23rd edn (London, 1791).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, William, Observations on the Use of Dr. James’s Powder, Tartar Emetic and Other Antimonial Preparations in Fevers (London: T. Cadell, 1774).

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Barry, Jonathan, ‘Publicity and the Public Good: Presenting Medicine in Eighteenth-Century Bristol’, in Medical Fringe and Medical Orthodoxy 1750–1850, edited by W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Maxine, Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. G, A Catalogue of the Revenue Stamps of the U K, Isle of Man, Channel Islands and Eire, 2 vols (Hexham, Northumberland: Tim Clutterbuck, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. F, ‘Treating the Wages of Sin: Venereal Disease and Specialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, in Medical Fringe and Medical Orthodoxy 1750–1850, edited by W. F Bynum and Roy Porter (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Robert Brudenell, Doctors and Their Work, or Medicine, Quackery and Disease (London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbett, William, Cobbett’s Parliamentary History of England, 36 vols (London: R Bagshaw, 1806–1820).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, Lisa Forman, ‘“No Cure, No Money,” or the Invisible Hand of Quackery: The Language of Commerce, Credit, and Cash in Eighteenth-Century British Medical Advertisements’, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 28 (1999): 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J, ‘Good Advice and Little Medicine: The Professional Authority of Early Modern English Physicians’, Journal of British Studies, 33 (1994): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J, ‘Colbatch, Sir John’, ODNB (accessed 11 November 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J, and Timothy D. Walker, ‘Circulation of Medicine in the Early Modern Atlantic World’, Social History of Medicine, 26 (2013): 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield, Penelope, Power and the Professions in Britain 1700–1850 (London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, Charles, ‘Cockburn, William’, rev. Anita Guerrini, ODNB (accessed 11 November 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curth, Louise, ‘The Commercialisation of Medicine in the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1640–1700’, Seventeenth Century, 17 (2002): 48–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curth, Louise, English Almanacs, Astrology and Popular Medicine: 1550–1700 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLacy, Margaret, The Germ of an Idea: Contagionism and Society in Britain, 1660–1730 (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fissell, Mary, Patients, Power, and the Poor in Eighteenth-Century Bristol (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fissell, Mary, ‘The Marketplace of Print’, in Medicine and the Market in England and its Colonies, c.1450c.1850, edited by Mark Jenner and Patrick Wallis (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 108–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furdell, Elizabeth Lane, Publishing and Medicine in Early Modern England (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Gordon, ‘Glass, Thomas’, rev. Alick Cameron, ODNB (accessed 21 Dec 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, David, and Patrick Wallis, ‘Quacking and Commerce in Seventeenth-Century London: The Proprietary Medicine Business of Anthony Daffy’, Medical History, Supplement 25 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfand, William, Quack, Quack, Quack: The Sellers of Nostrums in Prints, Posters, Ephemera and Books (New York: Grolier Club, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. W. F, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain 1841–1991: A Political and Social History (London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Peter, ed., The Journals and Letters of Fanny Burney (Madame D’Arblay): Vol.VIII (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kett, J. F, ‘Provincial Medical Practice in England 1730–1815’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 19 (1964): 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Joan, ‘Eighteenth-Century Medical Practice: A Case Study of Bradford Wilmer, Surgeon of Coventry, 1737–1813’, Social History of Medicine, 3 (1990): 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Joan, A Social History of Medicine, (London: Routledge, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Susan C, ‘Private Enterprise and Public Interests: Medical Education and the Apothecaries Act, 1780–1825’, in British Medicine in an Age of Reform, edited by Roger French and Andrew Wear (London: Routledge, 1991), 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, Lori, ‘Doctors and Patent Medicines in Modern Britain: Professionalism and Consumerism’, Albion, 33 (2001): 404–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, Irvine, Medical Care and the General Practitioner 1750–1850 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, Irvine, ‘“The Vile Race of Quacks with which this Country is Infested”’, in Medical Fringe and Medical Orthodoxy 1750–1850, edited by W F Bynum and Roy Porter (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, Alan, ‘Authority and Ownership: The Growth and Wilting of Medicine Patenting in Georgian England’, British Journal for the History of Science, 49 (2016): 541–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, Christine, Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehle, Andrea-Holger, Drugs on Trial: Experimental Pharmacology and Therapeutic Innovation in the Eighteenth Century (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, Neil, ‘Commercialisation and the Economy’, in The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, edited by Neil McKendrick, John Brewer and J. H Plumb (London: Europa, 1982), 7–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Wendy, ‘John Hunter: Learning from Natural Experiments, “Placebos”, and the State of Mind of a Patient in the 18th Century’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102 (2009): 394–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevett, T. R, Advertising in Britain: A History (London: Heinemann, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, Stephen, John Hunter: Man of Science and Surgeon (1728–1793) (London: Fisher Unwin, 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedley, Avril, ed., A Georgian Marriage: The Family Papers of Sir Nash and Lady Grose 1761–1814 (Wimborne Minster: Dovecote Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picton, J. A, Memorials of Liverpool, 2nd edn, 2 vols (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1875).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, J. H, ‘Commercialisation and Society’, in The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, edited by Neil McKendrick, John Brewer and J. H Plumb (London: Europa, 1982), 263–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Dorothy, and Roy Porter, Patient’s Progress: Doctors and Doctoring in Eighteenth-Century England (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy, ‘Before the Fringe: ‘Quackery’ and the Eighteenth Century Medical Market’, in Studies in the History of Alternative Medicine, edited by Roger Cooter (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 1988), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy, Health for Sale: Quackery in England 1660–1850 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy, and Dorothy Porter, ‘The Rise of the English Drugs Industry: The Role of Thomas Corbyn’, Medical History, 33 (1989): 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, F. H, ‘Old Proprietary Medicines’, Pharmaceutical Historian, 26 (1996): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, Richard, The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland and America (London: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Paul, Quacks, Rogues and Charlatans (London: Royal College of Physicians, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The Messrs. Newbery’, Chemist and Druggist, 15 (1874): 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, Patrick, and Teerapa Pirohakul, ‘Medical Revolutions? The Growth of Medicine in England, 1660–1800’, Journal of Social History, 49 (2016): 510–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill, Lorna, ed., The Account Book of Richard Latham 1724–1767 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Charles, A Bookseller of the Last Century (London: Griffith, Farran, Okeden & Welsh, 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, Wayne, Medicine-by-Post (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Titles of Patents of Invention, Chronologically Arranged (London: Patent Office, 1854).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, E. A, and R. S Schofield, The Population History of England 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Mackintosh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mackintosh, A. (2018). The Status of Patent Medicines. In: The Patent Medicines Industry in Georgian England. Medicine and Biomedical Sciences in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69778-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69778-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69777-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69778-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics