Skip to main content

Process Assessment of Risks in the Production Company with the Use of Linguistic Variables and the FMEA Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM 2017 (ISPEM 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 637))

Abstract

The paper focused on the process approach to risk assessment in the production company from the SME. Based on the literature review, there was prepared a proposal of the analytical procedure, taking into account the holistic approach to identifying risks in the enterprise. There was distinguished the three main areas of analysis: the workflow organization together with information flows in the production process, maintenance of technical infrastructure and processes performance within the automotive supply chain. Based on the proposed method of risk assessment, there was conducted an analytical procedure in a selected production company, which is currently under development phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apostolakis, G.E.: How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Anal. 24, 515–520 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arunraj, N.S., Maiti, J.: Risk-based maintenance - techniques and applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 142, 653–661 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aven, T.: Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context – review and discussion. Saf. Sci. 47, 798–806 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aven, T.: On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 623–631 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aven, T.: The risk concept – historical and recent development trends. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 99, 119–132 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aven, T.: Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253, 1–13 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Backlund, F., Hannu, J.: Can we make maintenance decisions on risk analysis? J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 8(1), 77–91 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, S.J., May, I.L.: Risk-based hazardous protection and prevention by inspection and maintenance. Trans. ASME J. Press. Vessel Technol. 122, 362–367 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burduk, A.: An attempt to adapt serial reliability structures for the needs of analyses and assessments of the risk in production systems. Eksploat. Niezawodn. (Maintenance and Reliability) 3, 85–96 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Burduk, A.: Assessment of risk in a production system with the use of the FMEA analysis and linguistic variables. In: Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems: 7th International Conference, HAIS 2012, Salamanca, Spain, March 28–30, 2012, pp. 250–258. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ceryno, P.S., Scawarda, L.F., Klingebiel, K., Yüzgülec, G.: Supply chain risk management: a content analysis approach. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 4(3), 141–150 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, T.M., Chiu, C.H., Chan, H.K., Choi, T.M.: Risk management of logistics systems. Transp. Res. Part E 90, 1–6 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. COSO enterprise risk management – integrated framework. COSO (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J.: Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138, 115–134 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hampel, J.: Different concepts of risk – a challenge for risk communication. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296, 5–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harnly, J.A.: Risk-based prioritization of maintenance repair work. Process Saf. Prog. 17(1), 32–38 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Drożyner, P.: Maintenance management initiatives towards achieving sustainable development. In: Golinska, P., et al. (eds.) Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering Environmental Science and Engineering, pp. 707–721. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Drożyner, P.: Preventive and pro-active ergonomics influence on maintenance excellence level. In: Robertson, M.M. (ed.) Ergonomics and Health Aspects, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6779, pp. 49–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jorion, P.: Value at Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jüttner, U., Peck, H., Christopher, M.: Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist. 6(4), 197–210 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kallenberg, K.: Operational risk management in Swedish industry: emergence of a new risk paradigm. Risk Manag. 11(2), 90–110 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, S.: The words of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 17, 407–417 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan, F.I., Haddara, M.M.: Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 16(6), 561–573 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan, F.I., Haddara, M.: Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production facilities. J. Hazard. Mater. A108, 147–159 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan, O., Burnes, B.: Risk and supply chain management: creating a research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 18(2), 197–216 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kjellen, U., Motet, G., Hale, A.: Resolving multiple criteria in decision-making involving risk of accidental loss. Saf. Sci. 47(6), 795–797 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. King, J.L.: Operational Risk: Measurement and Modelling. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kłosowski, G., Gola, A.: Risk-based estimation of manufacturing order costs with artificial intelligence. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 206 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 729–732 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kłosowski, G., Gola, A., Świć, A.: Application of Fuzzy logic in assigning workers to production tasks. In: Omatu, S., Selamat, A., Bocewicz, G., Sitek, P., Nielsen I., Garcia-Garcia, J.A., Bajo, J. (eds.) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 13th International Conference. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 474, pp. 505–513 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar, G., Maiti, J.: Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9946–9954 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lalonde, C., Boiral, O.: Managing risks through ISO 31000: a critical analysis. Risk Manag. 14(4), 272–300 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luko, S.N.: Risk management principles and guidelines. Qual. Eng. 25, 451–454 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manuj, I., Mentzer, J.T.: Global supply chain risk management. J. Bus. Logist. 29(1), 133–155 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore, W.J., Starr, A.G.: An intelligent maintenance system for continuous cost-based prioritization of maintenance activities. Comput. Ind. 57, 595–606 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. PN-ISO 31000:2010: Risk management – principles and guide-lines. PKN, Warsaw (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Relich, M., Witkowski, K., Saniuk, S., et al.: A knowledge based approach to production planning and scheduling in a metallurgical company. In: 23rd International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, pp. 1846–1851 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tang, C.S.: Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int. J. Logist. 9(1), 33–45 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang, O., Musa, S.N.: Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 133(1), 25–34 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thun, J., Hoening, D.: An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131(1), 242–249 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, Y., Cheng, G., Hu, H., Wu, W.: Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25, 958–965 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zawarska, J.: Risk identification and risk assessment in the risk management process. Zarz. Finanse 10(1), 65–75 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, J.: Analiza ryzyka operacyjnego z perspektywy teorii organizacji. Zesz. Naukowe Uniw. Szczec. 690, 179–188 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Tubis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tubis, A. (2018). Process Assessment of Risks in the Production Company with the Use of Linguistic Variables and the FMEA Analysis. In: Burduk, A., Mazurkiewicz, D. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM 2017. ISPEM 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 637. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64465-3_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64465-3_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64464-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64465-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics