Skip to main content

Cmaps with Errors: Why not? Comparing Two Cmap-Based Assessment Tasks to Evaluate Conceptual Understanding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovating with Concept Mapping (CMC 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 635))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Student-generated concept maps (Cmaps) have been the preferred choice to design assessment tasks, which are time-consuming in real classroom settings. We have proposed the use of Cmap with errors (elaborated by teachers) to develop assessment tasks, as a way to address the logistical practicality obstacles usually found in classrooms. This paper compared two different tasks, finding the errors and judging the selected propositions in Cmap with errors, exploring two topics with different levels of difficulty. Our results confirmed Cmap with errors as a straightforward approach to include concept mapping into the classroom routine to foster the pedagogic resonance (the bridge between teacher knowledge and student learning), which is critical for motivating students to learn meaningfully. Moreover, Cmaps with errors are also amenable for on-line learning platforms. Future works of our research group will develop an automated process for evaluation and feedback using the task formats presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ausubel, D.P.: The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Novak, J.D.: Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S., Hay, D.B.: Universities as centres of non-learning. Stud. High. Educ. 33(1), 89–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trigwell, K., Shale, S.: Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud. High. Educ. 29(4), 523–536 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay, D., Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S.: Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 33(3), 295–311 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Su, I.H., Lin, I.H.: A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competencies in mobile learning activities. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 11(1), 10–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kinchin, I.M.: Concept mapping in biology. J. Biol. Educ. 34(2), 61–68 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pendley, B.D., Bretz, R.L., Novak, J.D.: Concept maps as a tool to assess learning in chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 71(1), 9–15 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soika, K., Reiska, P.: Using concept mapping for assessment in science education. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 13(5), 662–673 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., Canaday, D.: Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning - a report of methodology. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(12), 1221–1246 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shavelson, R.J.: Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 33(6), 569–600 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McClure, J.R., Sonak, B., Suen, H.K.: Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36(4), 475–492 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aguiar, J.G., Correia, P.R.M.: Is a concept mapping with errors useful for evaluating learning outcomes? A study on declarative knowledge and reading strategies using eye-tracking. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Concept Mapping (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aguiar, J.G., Correia, P.R.M.: Assessment task based on concept map with errors to foster pedagogic resonance in higher education. Paper presented at the 16th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank FAPESP (Grant # 2012/22693-5, São Paulo Research Foundation) for funding our research group. J. G. A. thanks CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for her scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Correia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Correia, P., Cabral, G., Aguiar, J. (2016). Cmaps with Errors: Why not? Comparing Two Cmap-Based Assessment Tasks to Evaluate Conceptual Understanding. In: Cañas, A., Reiska, P., Novak, J. (eds) Innovating with Concept Mapping. CMC 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 635. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45501-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45501-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45500-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45501-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics