Abstract
Student-generated concept maps (Cmaps) have been the preferred choice to design assessment tasks, which are time-consuming in real classroom settings. We have proposed the use of Cmap with errors (elaborated by teachers) to develop assessment tasks, as a way to address the logistical practicality obstacles usually found in classrooms. This paper compared two different tasks, finding the errors and judging the selected propositions in Cmap with errors, exploring two topics with different levels of difficulty. Our results confirmed Cmap with errors as a straightforward approach to include concept mapping into the classroom routine to foster the pedagogic resonance (the bridge between teacher knowledge and student learning), which is critical for motivating students to learn meaningfully. Moreover, Cmaps with errors are also amenable for on-line learning platforms. Future works of our research group will develop an automated process for evaluation and feedback using the task formats presented in this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ausubel, D.P.: The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
Novak, J.D.: Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2010)
Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S., Hay, D.B.: Universities as centres of non-learning. Stud. High. Educ. 33(1), 89–103 (2008)
Trigwell, K., Shale, S.: Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud. High. Educ. 29(4), 523–536 (2004)
Hay, D., Kinchin, I.M., Lygo-Baker, S.: Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 33(3), 295–311 (2008)
Hung, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Su, I.H., Lin, I.H.: A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competencies in mobile learning activities. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 11(1), 10–19 (2012)
Kinchin, I.M.: Concept mapping in biology. J. Biol. Educ. 34(2), 61–68 (2000)
Pendley, B.D., Bretz, R.L., Novak, J.D.: Concept maps as a tool to assess learning in chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 71(1), 9–15 (1994)
Soika, K., Reiska, P.: Using concept mapping for assessment in science education. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 13(5), 662–673 (2014)
Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., Canaday, D.: Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning - a report of methodology. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(12), 1221–1246 (2000)
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shavelson, R.J.: Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 33(6), 569–600 (1996)
McClure, J.R., Sonak, B., Suen, H.K.: Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36(4), 475–492 (1999)
Aguiar, J.G., Correia, P.R.M.: Is a concept mapping with errors useful for evaluating learning outcomes? A study on declarative knowledge and reading strategies using eye-tracking. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Concept Mapping (2014)
Aguiar, J.G., Correia, P.R.M.: Assessment task based on concept map with errors to foster pedagogic resonance in higher education. Paper presented at the 16th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference (2015)
Acknowledgements
We thank FAPESP (Grant # 2012/22693-5, São Paulo Research Foundation) for funding our research group. J. G. A. thanks CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for her scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Correia, P., Cabral, G., Aguiar, J. (2016). Cmaps with Errors: Why not? Comparing Two Cmap-Based Assessment Tasks to Evaluate Conceptual Understanding. In: Cañas, A., Reiska, P., Novak, J. (eds) Innovating with Concept Mapping. CMC 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 635. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45501-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45501-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45500-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45501-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)